Cargando…

Varied effects of tobacco smoke and e-cigarette vapor suggest that nicotine does not affect endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide signaling

Chronic smoking causes dysfunction of vascular endothelial cells, evident as a reduction of flow-mediated dilation in smokers, but the role of nicotine is still controversial. Given the increasing use of e-cigarettes and other nicotine products, it appears essential to clarify this issue. We studied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wölkart, Gerald, Kollau, Alexander, Russwurm, Michael, Koesling, Doris, Schrammel, Astrid, Mayer, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37739972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42750-6
_version_ 1785109263722479616
author Wölkart, Gerald
Kollau, Alexander
Russwurm, Michael
Koesling, Doris
Schrammel, Astrid
Mayer, Bernd
author_facet Wölkart, Gerald
Kollau, Alexander
Russwurm, Michael
Koesling, Doris
Schrammel, Astrid
Mayer, Bernd
author_sort Wölkart, Gerald
collection PubMed
description Chronic smoking causes dysfunction of vascular endothelial cells, evident as a reduction of flow-mediated dilation in smokers, but the role of nicotine is still controversial. Given the increasing use of e-cigarettes and other nicotine products, it appears essential to clarify this issue. We studied extracts from cigarette smoke (CSE) and vapor from e-cigarettes (EVE) and heated tobacco (HTE) for their effects on vascular relaxation, endothelial nitric oxide signaling, and the activity of soluble guanylyl cyclase. The average nicotine concentrations of CSE, EVE, and HTE were 164, 800, and 85 µM, respectively. At a dilution of 1:3, CSE almost entirely inhibited the relaxation of rat aortas and porcine coronary arteries to acetylcholine and bradykinin, respectively, while undiluted EVE, with a 15-fold higher nicotine concentration, had no significant effect. With about 50% inhibition at 1:2 dilution, the effect of HTE was between CSE and EVE. Neither extract affected endothelium-independent relaxation to an NO donor. At the dilutions tested, CSE was not toxic to cultured endothelial cells but, in contrast to EVE, impaired NO signaling and inhibited NO stimulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Our results demonstrate that nicotine does not mediate the impaired endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation caused by smoking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10517138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105171382023-09-24 Varied effects of tobacco smoke and e-cigarette vapor suggest that nicotine does not affect endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide signaling Wölkart, Gerald Kollau, Alexander Russwurm, Michael Koesling, Doris Schrammel, Astrid Mayer, Bernd Sci Rep Article Chronic smoking causes dysfunction of vascular endothelial cells, evident as a reduction of flow-mediated dilation in smokers, but the role of nicotine is still controversial. Given the increasing use of e-cigarettes and other nicotine products, it appears essential to clarify this issue. We studied extracts from cigarette smoke (CSE) and vapor from e-cigarettes (EVE) and heated tobacco (HTE) for their effects on vascular relaxation, endothelial nitric oxide signaling, and the activity of soluble guanylyl cyclase. The average nicotine concentrations of CSE, EVE, and HTE were 164, 800, and 85 µM, respectively. At a dilution of 1:3, CSE almost entirely inhibited the relaxation of rat aortas and porcine coronary arteries to acetylcholine and bradykinin, respectively, while undiluted EVE, with a 15-fold higher nicotine concentration, had no significant effect. With about 50% inhibition at 1:2 dilution, the effect of HTE was between CSE and EVE. Neither extract affected endothelium-independent relaxation to an NO donor. At the dilutions tested, CSE was not toxic to cultured endothelial cells but, in contrast to EVE, impaired NO signaling and inhibited NO stimulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Our results demonstrate that nicotine does not mediate the impaired endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation caused by smoking. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10517138/ /pubmed/37739972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42750-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wölkart, Gerald
Kollau, Alexander
Russwurm, Michael
Koesling, Doris
Schrammel, Astrid
Mayer, Bernd
Varied effects of tobacco smoke and e-cigarette vapor suggest that nicotine does not affect endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide signaling
title Varied effects of tobacco smoke and e-cigarette vapor suggest that nicotine does not affect endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide signaling
title_full Varied effects of tobacco smoke and e-cigarette vapor suggest that nicotine does not affect endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide signaling
title_fullStr Varied effects of tobacco smoke and e-cigarette vapor suggest that nicotine does not affect endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide signaling
title_full_unstemmed Varied effects of tobacco smoke and e-cigarette vapor suggest that nicotine does not affect endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide signaling
title_short Varied effects of tobacco smoke and e-cigarette vapor suggest that nicotine does not affect endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide signaling
title_sort varied effects of tobacco smoke and e-cigarette vapor suggest that nicotine does not affect endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide signaling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37739972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42750-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wolkartgerald variedeffectsoftobaccosmokeandecigarettevaporsuggestthatnicotinedoesnotaffectendotheliumdependentrelaxationandnitricoxidesignaling
AT kollaualexander variedeffectsoftobaccosmokeandecigarettevaporsuggestthatnicotinedoesnotaffectendotheliumdependentrelaxationandnitricoxidesignaling
AT russwurmmichael variedeffectsoftobaccosmokeandecigarettevaporsuggestthatnicotinedoesnotaffectendotheliumdependentrelaxationandnitricoxidesignaling
AT koeslingdoris variedeffectsoftobaccosmokeandecigarettevaporsuggestthatnicotinedoesnotaffectendotheliumdependentrelaxationandnitricoxidesignaling
AT schrammelastrid variedeffectsoftobaccosmokeandecigarettevaporsuggestthatnicotinedoesnotaffectendotheliumdependentrelaxationandnitricoxidesignaling
AT mayerbernd variedeffectsoftobaccosmokeandecigarettevaporsuggestthatnicotinedoesnotaffectendotheliumdependentrelaxationandnitricoxidesignaling