Cargando…
The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
PURPOSE: Tamoxifen is used for the suppression of estrogen‐sensitive tumor recurrence in oocyte retrieval cycles. This meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the quality of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with co‐administration of gonadotropins and tamoxifen (COS with tamoxifen). METHODS: PubMed, Emba...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12543 |
_version_ | 1785109294489796608 |
---|---|
author | Yoshida, Tsukasa Takahashi, Osamu Suzuki, Yoko Ota, Erika Hirata, Tetsuya |
author_facet | Yoshida, Tsukasa Takahashi, Osamu Suzuki, Yoko Ota, Erika Hirata, Tetsuya |
author_sort | Yoshida, Tsukasa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Tamoxifen is used for the suppression of estrogen‐sensitive tumor recurrence in oocyte retrieval cycles. This meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the quality of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with co‐administration of gonadotropins and tamoxifen (COS with tamoxifen). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles on October 30, 2022. The authors included studies comparing COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropins and letrozole (COS with letrozole) or gonadotropin only (COS with gonadotropin only) for fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. The main outcome measures were the COS quality, total number of retrieved oocytes (TOR), total number of mature oocytes (TMO), and peak estradiol levels (PEL). RESULTS: Four studies (348 patients, two randomized controlled trials, and two cohort studies) were included in our meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in TOR (95% CI, [−3.84, 2.90]) and TMO (95% CI, [−2.20, 2.64]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole. There was also no difference in TOR (95% CI, [−6.14, 1.86]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropin only. Statistically significant decrease was observed in PEL during COS with letrozole compared with tamoxifen (95% CI, [1414.4, 4953.7]). CONCLUSIONS: The quality did not differ between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole or gonadotropin only. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10517303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105173032023-09-24 The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Yoshida, Tsukasa Takahashi, Osamu Suzuki, Yoko Ota, Erika Hirata, Tetsuya Reprod Med Biol Reviews PURPOSE: Tamoxifen is used for the suppression of estrogen‐sensitive tumor recurrence in oocyte retrieval cycles. This meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the quality of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with co‐administration of gonadotropins and tamoxifen (COS with tamoxifen). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles on October 30, 2022. The authors included studies comparing COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropins and letrozole (COS with letrozole) or gonadotropin only (COS with gonadotropin only) for fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. The main outcome measures were the COS quality, total number of retrieved oocytes (TOR), total number of mature oocytes (TMO), and peak estradiol levels (PEL). RESULTS: Four studies (348 patients, two randomized controlled trials, and two cohort studies) were included in our meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in TOR (95% CI, [−3.84, 2.90]) and TMO (95% CI, [−2.20, 2.64]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole. There was also no difference in TOR (95% CI, [−6.14, 1.86]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropin only. Statistically significant decrease was observed in PEL during COS with letrozole compared with tamoxifen (95% CI, [1414.4, 4953.7]). CONCLUSIONS: The quality did not differ between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole or gonadotropin only. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10517303/ /pubmed/37745035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12543 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Yoshida, Tsukasa Takahashi, Osamu Suzuki, Yoko Ota, Erika Hirata, Tetsuya The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoshidatsukasa theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT takahashiosamu theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT suzukiyoko theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT otaerika theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hiratatetsuya theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yoshidatsukasa effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT takahashiosamu effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT suzukiyoko effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT otaerika effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hiratatetsuya effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |