Cargando…

The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

PURPOSE: Tamoxifen is used for the suppression of estrogen‐sensitive tumor recurrence in oocyte retrieval cycles. This meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the quality of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with co‐administration of gonadotropins and tamoxifen (COS with tamoxifen). METHODS: PubMed, Emba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshida, Tsukasa, Takahashi, Osamu, Suzuki, Yoko, Ota, Erika, Hirata, Tetsuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12543
_version_ 1785109294489796608
author Yoshida, Tsukasa
Takahashi, Osamu
Suzuki, Yoko
Ota, Erika
Hirata, Tetsuya
author_facet Yoshida, Tsukasa
Takahashi, Osamu
Suzuki, Yoko
Ota, Erika
Hirata, Tetsuya
author_sort Yoshida, Tsukasa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Tamoxifen is used for the suppression of estrogen‐sensitive tumor recurrence in oocyte retrieval cycles. This meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the quality of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with co‐administration of gonadotropins and tamoxifen (COS with tamoxifen). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles on October 30, 2022. The authors included studies comparing COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropins and letrozole (COS with letrozole) or gonadotropin only (COS with gonadotropin only) for fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. The main outcome measures were the COS quality, total number of retrieved oocytes (TOR), total number of mature oocytes (TMO), and peak estradiol levels (PEL). RESULTS: Four studies (348 patients, two randomized controlled trials, and two cohort studies) were included in our meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in TOR (95% CI, [−3.84, 2.90]) and TMO (95% CI, [−2.20, 2.64]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole. There was also no difference in TOR (95% CI, [−6.14, 1.86]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropin only. Statistically significant decrease was observed in PEL during COS with letrozole compared with tamoxifen (95% CI, [1414.4, 4953.7]). CONCLUSIONS: The quality did not differ between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole or gonadotropin only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10517303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105173032023-09-24 The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Yoshida, Tsukasa Takahashi, Osamu Suzuki, Yoko Ota, Erika Hirata, Tetsuya Reprod Med Biol Reviews PURPOSE: Tamoxifen is used for the suppression of estrogen‐sensitive tumor recurrence in oocyte retrieval cycles. This meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the quality of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with co‐administration of gonadotropins and tamoxifen (COS with tamoxifen). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles on October 30, 2022. The authors included studies comparing COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropins and letrozole (COS with letrozole) or gonadotropin only (COS with gonadotropin only) for fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. The main outcome measures were the COS quality, total number of retrieved oocytes (TOR), total number of mature oocytes (TMO), and peak estradiol levels (PEL). RESULTS: Four studies (348 patients, two randomized controlled trials, and two cohort studies) were included in our meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in TOR (95% CI, [−3.84, 2.90]) and TMO (95% CI, [−2.20, 2.64]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole. There was also no difference in TOR (95% CI, [−6.14, 1.86]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropin only. Statistically significant decrease was observed in PEL during COS with letrozole compared with tamoxifen (95% CI, [1414.4, 4953.7]). CONCLUSIONS: The quality did not differ between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole or gonadotropin only. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10517303/ /pubmed/37745035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12543 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Yoshida, Tsukasa
Takahashi, Osamu
Suzuki, Yoko
Ota, Erika
Hirata, Tetsuya
The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen‐sensitive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12543
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshidatsukasa theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT takahashiosamu theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suzukiyoko theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT otaerika theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hiratatetsuya theeffectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoshidatsukasa effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT takahashiosamu effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suzukiyoko effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT otaerika effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hiratatetsuya effectivenessofcontrolledovarianstimulationwithtamoxifenforpatientswithestrogensensitivebreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis