Cargando…

Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location

Central vision loss is one of the leading causes of visual impairment in the elderly and its frequency is increasing. Without formal training, patients adopt an unaffected region of the retina as a new fixation location, a preferred retinal locus (PRL). However, learning to use the PRL as a referenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melnik, Natalia, Pollmann, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37733339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.13
_version_ 1785109316621041664
author Melnik, Natalia
Pollmann, Stefan
author_facet Melnik, Natalia
Pollmann, Stefan
author_sort Melnik, Natalia
collection PubMed
description Central vision loss is one of the leading causes of visual impairment in the elderly and its frequency is increasing. Without formal training, patients adopt an unaffected region of the retina as a new fixation location, a preferred retinal locus (PRL). However, learning to use the PRL as a reference location for saccades, that is, saccadic re-referencing, is protracted and time-consuming. Recent studies showed that training with visual search tasks can expedite this process. However, visual search can be driven by salient external features – leading to efficient search, or by internal goals, usually leading to inefficient, attention-demanding search. We compared saccadic re-referencing training in the presence of a simulated central scotoma with either an efficient or an inefficient visual search task. Participants had to respond by fixating the target with an experimenter-defined retinal location in the lower visual field. We observed that comparable relative training gains were obtained in both tasks for a number of behavioral parameters, with higher training gains for the trained task, compared to the untrained task. The transfer to the untrained task was only observed for some parameters. Our findings thus confirm and extend previous research showing comparable efficiency for exogenously and endogenously driven visual search tasks for saccadic re-referencing training. Our results also show that transfer of training gains to related tasks may be limited and needs to be tested for saccadic re-referencing-training paradigms to assess its suitability as a training tool for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10517419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105174192023-09-24 Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location Melnik, Natalia Pollmann, Stefan J Vis Article Central vision loss is one of the leading causes of visual impairment in the elderly and its frequency is increasing. Without formal training, patients adopt an unaffected region of the retina as a new fixation location, a preferred retinal locus (PRL). However, learning to use the PRL as a reference location for saccades, that is, saccadic re-referencing, is protracted and time-consuming. Recent studies showed that training with visual search tasks can expedite this process. However, visual search can be driven by salient external features – leading to efficient search, or by internal goals, usually leading to inefficient, attention-demanding search. We compared saccadic re-referencing training in the presence of a simulated central scotoma with either an efficient or an inefficient visual search task. Participants had to respond by fixating the target with an experimenter-defined retinal location in the lower visual field. We observed that comparable relative training gains were obtained in both tasks for a number of behavioral parameters, with higher training gains for the trained task, compared to the untrained task. The transfer to the untrained task was only observed for some parameters. Our findings thus confirm and extend previous research showing comparable efficiency for exogenously and endogenously driven visual search tasks for saccadic re-referencing training. Our results also show that transfer of training gains to related tasks may be limited and needs to be tested for saccadic re-referencing-training paradigms to assess its suitability as a training tool for patients. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10517419/ /pubmed/37733339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.13 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Melnik, Natalia
Pollmann, Stefan
Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location
title Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location
title_full Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location
title_fullStr Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location
title_full_unstemmed Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location
title_short Efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location
title_sort efficient versus inefficient visual search as training for saccadic re-referencing to an extrafoveal location
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37733339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.13
work_keys_str_mv AT melniknatalia efficientversusinefficientvisualsearchastrainingforsaccadicrereferencingtoanextrafoveallocation
AT pollmannstefan efficientversusinefficientvisualsearchastrainingforsaccadicrereferencingtoanextrafoveallocation