Cargando…
Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis
BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing globally, posing risks to women and babies. To reduce CS, educational interventions targeting pregnant women have been implemented globally, however, their effectiveness is varied. To optimise benefits of these interventions, it is important to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16718-0 |
_version_ | 1785109343025233920 |
---|---|
author | Zahroh, Rana Islamiah Sutcliffe, Katy Kneale, Dylan Vazquez Corona, Martha Betrán, Ana Pilar Opiyo, Newton Homer, Caroline S. E. Bohren, Meghan A. |
author_facet | Zahroh, Rana Islamiah Sutcliffe, Katy Kneale, Dylan Vazquez Corona, Martha Betrán, Ana Pilar Opiyo, Newton Homer, Caroline S. E. Bohren, Meghan A. |
author_sort | Zahroh, Rana Islamiah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing globally, posing risks to women and babies. To reduce CS, educational interventions targeting pregnant women have been implemented globally, however, their effectiveness is varied. To optimise benefits of these interventions, it is important to understand which intervention components influence success. In this study, we aimed to identify essential intervention components that lead to successful implementation of interventions focusing on pregnant women to optimise CS use. METHODS: We re-analysed existing systematic reviews that were used to develop and update WHO guidelines on non-clinical interventions to optimise CS. To identify if certain combinations of intervention components (e.g., how the intervention was delivered, and contextual characteristics) are associated with successful implementation, we conducted a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). We defined successful interventions as interventions that were able to reduce CS rates. We included 36 papers, comprising 17 CS intervention studies and an additional 19 sibling studies (e.g., secondary analyses, process evaluations) reporting on these interventions to identify intervention components. We conducted QCA in six stages: 1) Identifying conditions and calibrating the data; 2) Constructing truth tables, 3) Checking quality of truth tables; 4) Identifying parsimonious configurations through Boolean minimization; 5) Checking quality of the solution; 6) Interpretation of solutions. We used existing published qualitative evidence synthesis to develop potential theories driving intervention success. RESULTS: We found successful interventions were those that leveraged social or peer support through group-based intervention delivery, provided communication materials to women, encouraged emotional support by partner or family participation, and gave women opportunities to interact with health providers. Unsuccessful interventions were characterised by the absence of at least two of these components. CONCLUSION: We identified four key essential intervention components which can lead to successful interventions targeting women to reduce CS. These four components are 1) group-based delivery, 2) provision of IEC materials, 3) partner or family member involvement, and 4) opportunity for women to interact with health providers. Maternal health services and hospitals aiming to better prepare women for vaginal birth and reduce CS can consider including the identified components to optimise health and well-being benefits for the woman and baby. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16718-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10517530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105175302023-09-24 Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis Zahroh, Rana Islamiah Sutcliffe, Katy Kneale, Dylan Vazquez Corona, Martha Betrán, Ana Pilar Opiyo, Newton Homer, Caroline S. E. Bohren, Meghan A. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing globally, posing risks to women and babies. To reduce CS, educational interventions targeting pregnant women have been implemented globally, however, their effectiveness is varied. To optimise benefits of these interventions, it is important to understand which intervention components influence success. In this study, we aimed to identify essential intervention components that lead to successful implementation of interventions focusing on pregnant women to optimise CS use. METHODS: We re-analysed existing systematic reviews that were used to develop and update WHO guidelines on non-clinical interventions to optimise CS. To identify if certain combinations of intervention components (e.g., how the intervention was delivered, and contextual characteristics) are associated with successful implementation, we conducted a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). We defined successful interventions as interventions that were able to reduce CS rates. We included 36 papers, comprising 17 CS intervention studies and an additional 19 sibling studies (e.g., secondary analyses, process evaluations) reporting on these interventions to identify intervention components. We conducted QCA in six stages: 1) Identifying conditions and calibrating the data; 2) Constructing truth tables, 3) Checking quality of truth tables; 4) Identifying parsimonious configurations through Boolean minimization; 5) Checking quality of the solution; 6) Interpretation of solutions. We used existing published qualitative evidence synthesis to develop potential theories driving intervention success. RESULTS: We found successful interventions were those that leveraged social or peer support through group-based intervention delivery, provided communication materials to women, encouraged emotional support by partner or family participation, and gave women opportunities to interact with health providers. Unsuccessful interventions were characterised by the absence of at least two of these components. CONCLUSION: We identified four key essential intervention components which can lead to successful interventions targeting women to reduce CS. These four components are 1) group-based delivery, 2) provision of IEC materials, 3) partner or family member involvement, and 4) opportunity for women to interact with health providers. Maternal health services and hospitals aiming to better prepare women for vaginal birth and reduce CS can consider including the identified components to optimise health and well-being benefits for the woman and baby. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16718-0. BioMed Central 2023-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10517530/ /pubmed/37741979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16718-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zahroh, Rana Islamiah Sutcliffe, Katy Kneale, Dylan Vazquez Corona, Martha Betrán, Ana Pilar Opiyo, Newton Homer, Caroline S. E. Bohren, Meghan A. Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis |
title | Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis |
title_full | Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis |
title_fullStr | Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis |
title_short | Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis |
title_sort | educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: what are the essential elements? a qualitative comparative analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16718-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zahrohranaislamiah educationalinterventionstargetingpregnantwomentooptimisetheuseofcaesareansectionwhataretheessentialelementsaqualitativecomparativeanalysis AT sutcliffekaty educationalinterventionstargetingpregnantwomentooptimisetheuseofcaesareansectionwhataretheessentialelementsaqualitativecomparativeanalysis AT knealedylan educationalinterventionstargetingpregnantwomentooptimisetheuseofcaesareansectionwhataretheessentialelementsaqualitativecomparativeanalysis AT vazquezcoronamartha educationalinterventionstargetingpregnantwomentooptimisetheuseofcaesareansectionwhataretheessentialelementsaqualitativecomparativeanalysis AT betrananapilar educationalinterventionstargetingpregnantwomentooptimisetheuseofcaesareansectionwhataretheessentialelementsaqualitativecomparativeanalysis AT opiyonewton educationalinterventionstargetingpregnantwomentooptimisetheuseofcaesareansectionwhataretheessentialelementsaqualitativecomparativeanalysis AT homercarolinese educationalinterventionstargetingpregnantwomentooptimisetheuseofcaesareansectionwhataretheessentialelementsaqualitativecomparativeanalysis AT bohrenmeghana educationalinterventionstargetingpregnantwomentooptimisetheuseofcaesareansectionwhataretheessentialelementsaqualitativecomparativeanalysis |