Cargando…

“The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice”: Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice—Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care

Background. It is a patient’s right to be included in decisions about their health care. Implementing shared decision making (SDM) is important to enable active communication between clinicians and patients. Although health policy makers are increasingly mandating SDM implementation, SDM adoption ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waddell, Alex, Goodwin, Denise, Spassova, Gerri, Bragge, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37743932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683231199943
_version_ 1785109363646529536
author Waddell, Alex
Goodwin, Denise
Spassova, Gerri
Bragge, Peter
author_facet Waddell, Alex
Goodwin, Denise
Spassova, Gerri
Bragge, Peter
author_sort Waddell, Alex
collection PubMed
description Background. It is a patient’s right to be included in decisions about their health care. Implementing shared decision making (SDM) is important to enable active communication between clinicians and patients. Although health policy makers are increasingly mandating SDM implementation, SDM adoption has been slow. This study explored stakeholders’ organizational- and system-level barriers and facilitators to implementing policy mandated SDM in maternity care in Victoria, Australia. Method. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants including clinicians, health service administrators and decision makers, and government policy makers. Data were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation. Results. Factors identified as facilitating SDM implementation included using a whole-of-system approach, providing additional implementation resources, correct documentation facilitated by electronic medical records, and including patient outcomes in measurement. Barriers included health service lack of capacity, unclear policy definitions of SDM, and policy makers’ lack of resources to track implementation. Conclusion. This is the first study to our knowledge to explore barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation from the perspective of multiple actors following policy mandating SDM in tertiary health services in Australia. The primary finding was that there are concerns that SDM implementation policy is outpacing practice. Nonclinical staff play a crucial role translating policy to practice. Addressing organizational- and system-level barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation should be a key concern of health policy makers, health services, and staff. HIGHLIGHTS: New government policies require shared decision making (SDM) implementation in hospitals. There is limited evidence for how to implement SDM in hospital settings. There are concerns SDM implementation policy is outpacing practice. Understanding and capacity for SDM varies considerably among stakeholders. Whole of system approaches and electronic medical records are seen to facilitate SDM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10517621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105176212023-09-24 “The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice”: Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice—Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care Waddell, Alex Goodwin, Denise Spassova, Gerri Bragge, Peter MDM Policy Pract Original Research Article Background. It is a patient’s right to be included in decisions about their health care. Implementing shared decision making (SDM) is important to enable active communication between clinicians and patients. Although health policy makers are increasingly mandating SDM implementation, SDM adoption has been slow. This study explored stakeholders’ organizational- and system-level barriers and facilitators to implementing policy mandated SDM in maternity care in Victoria, Australia. Method. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants including clinicians, health service administrators and decision makers, and government policy makers. Data were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation. Results. Factors identified as facilitating SDM implementation included using a whole-of-system approach, providing additional implementation resources, correct documentation facilitated by electronic medical records, and including patient outcomes in measurement. Barriers included health service lack of capacity, unclear policy definitions of SDM, and policy makers’ lack of resources to track implementation. Conclusion. This is the first study to our knowledge to explore barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation from the perspective of multiple actors following policy mandating SDM in tertiary health services in Australia. The primary finding was that there are concerns that SDM implementation policy is outpacing practice. Nonclinical staff play a crucial role translating policy to practice. Addressing organizational- and system-level barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation should be a key concern of health policy makers, health services, and staff. HIGHLIGHTS: New government policies require shared decision making (SDM) implementation in hospitals. There is limited evidence for how to implement SDM in hospital settings. There are concerns SDM implementation policy is outpacing practice. Understanding and capacity for SDM varies considerably among stakeholders. Whole of system approaches and electronic medical records are seen to facilitate SDM. SAGE Publications 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10517621/ /pubmed/37743932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683231199943 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Waddell, Alex
Goodwin, Denise
Spassova, Gerri
Bragge, Peter
“The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice”: Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice—Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care
title “The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice”: Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice—Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care
title_full “The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice”: Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice—Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care
title_fullStr “The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice”: Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice—Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care
title_full_unstemmed “The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice”: Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice—Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care
title_short “The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice”: Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice—Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care
title_sort “the terminology might be ahead of practice”: embedding shared decision making in practice—barriers and facilitators to implementation of sdm in the context of maternity care
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37743932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683231199943
work_keys_str_mv AT waddellalex theterminologymightbeaheadofpracticeembeddingshareddecisionmakinginpracticebarriersandfacilitatorstoimplementationofsdminthecontextofmaternitycare
AT goodwindenise theterminologymightbeaheadofpracticeembeddingshareddecisionmakinginpracticebarriersandfacilitatorstoimplementationofsdminthecontextofmaternitycare
AT spassovagerri theterminologymightbeaheadofpracticeembeddingshareddecisionmakinginpracticebarriersandfacilitatorstoimplementationofsdminthecontextofmaternitycare
AT braggepeter theterminologymightbeaheadofpracticeembeddingshareddecisionmakinginpracticebarriersandfacilitatorstoimplementationofsdminthecontextofmaternitycare