Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacies of TINAVI robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures
The objective was to compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation with the aid of the TINAVI orthopaedic surgery robot with that of traditional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43136-4 |
_version_ | 1785109414951256064 |
---|---|
author | Li, Shuai Du, Jinpeng Huang, Yunfei Hao, Dingjun Zhao, Zhigang Chang, Zhen Zhu, Jingwen Wang, Xiaodong Duan, Yongchao He, BaoRong |
author_facet | Li, Shuai Du, Jinpeng Huang, Yunfei Hao, Dingjun Zhao, Zhigang Chang, Zhen Zhu, Jingwen Wang, Xiaodong Duan, Yongchao He, BaoRong |
author_sort | Li, Shuai |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective was to compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation with the aid of the TINAVI orthopaedic surgery robot with that of traditional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TINAVI robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery procedure. The clinical data of 60 patients with Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures treated surgically from June 2015 to February 2022 were analysed retrospectively. Among these patients, 25 were treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under TINAVI (the robot group), and 35 were treated with pedicle screw implantation assisted by a conventional C-arm X-ray machine (the traditional operation group). The pedicle screw placement grade was evaluated according to the Rampersaud scale. The correct rate of pedicle screw placement was calculated. The invasion of adjacent facet joints, VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale), NDI score (Neck Disability Index), SF-36 score (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire), EQ-5D score (EuroQol-5 dimensions questionnaire) and operation-related data were recorded, and patients were followed up. All patients were followed up for an average of 15.0 ± 3.4 months. The accuracy of screw placement in the robot group was higher than that in the traditional operation group, while the rates of intraoperative blood loss and invasion of the facet joint were lower and the incision length and length of hospital stay were shorter. On the 3rd day after the operation, the VAS score in the robot group was significantly higher than that in the traditional operation group, but there was no significant difference in the NDI score. On the 3rd day after the operation, the SF-36 and EQ-5 questionnaire scores of the robot group were better than those of the traditional operation group. No complications occurred in any of the patients. Postoperative cervical X-ray showed that the cervical vertebra was stable, and there was no fracture, angle or displacement. Postoperative CT showed that all fractures healed, and the average healing time was 3.4 months. The treatment of Levine–Edward IIA (postrepositioning) hangman fractures with percutaneous pedicle fixation assisted by the TINAVI orthopaedic surgery robot can significantly improve screw placement accuracy with a low rate of invasion of the adjacent facet joint, a short operation time, a low bleeding rate, and high patient satisfaction. Although there are still many disadvantages, it still has good prospects for application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10517983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105179832023-09-25 Comparison of the efficacies of TINAVI robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures Li, Shuai Du, Jinpeng Huang, Yunfei Hao, Dingjun Zhao, Zhigang Chang, Zhen Zhu, Jingwen Wang, Xiaodong Duan, Yongchao He, BaoRong Sci Rep Article The objective was to compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation with the aid of the TINAVI orthopaedic surgery robot with that of traditional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TINAVI robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery procedure. The clinical data of 60 patients with Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures treated surgically from June 2015 to February 2022 were analysed retrospectively. Among these patients, 25 were treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under TINAVI (the robot group), and 35 were treated with pedicle screw implantation assisted by a conventional C-arm X-ray machine (the traditional operation group). The pedicle screw placement grade was evaluated according to the Rampersaud scale. The correct rate of pedicle screw placement was calculated. The invasion of adjacent facet joints, VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale), NDI score (Neck Disability Index), SF-36 score (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire), EQ-5D score (EuroQol-5 dimensions questionnaire) and operation-related data were recorded, and patients were followed up. All patients were followed up for an average of 15.0 ± 3.4 months. The accuracy of screw placement in the robot group was higher than that in the traditional operation group, while the rates of intraoperative blood loss and invasion of the facet joint were lower and the incision length and length of hospital stay were shorter. On the 3rd day after the operation, the VAS score in the robot group was significantly higher than that in the traditional operation group, but there was no significant difference in the NDI score. On the 3rd day after the operation, the SF-36 and EQ-5 questionnaire scores of the robot group were better than those of the traditional operation group. No complications occurred in any of the patients. Postoperative cervical X-ray showed that the cervical vertebra was stable, and there was no fracture, angle or displacement. Postoperative CT showed that all fractures healed, and the average healing time was 3.4 months. The treatment of Levine–Edward IIA (postrepositioning) hangman fractures with percutaneous pedicle fixation assisted by the TINAVI orthopaedic surgery robot can significantly improve screw placement accuracy with a low rate of invasion of the adjacent facet joint, a short operation time, a low bleeding rate, and high patient satisfaction. Although there are still many disadvantages, it still has good prospects for application. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10517983/ /pubmed/37741877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43136-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Shuai Du, Jinpeng Huang, Yunfei Hao, Dingjun Zhao, Zhigang Chang, Zhen Zhu, Jingwen Wang, Xiaodong Duan, Yongchao He, BaoRong Comparison of the efficacies of TINAVI robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures |
title | Comparison of the efficacies of TINAVI robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures |
title_full | Comparison of the efficacies of TINAVI robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the efficacies of TINAVI robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the efficacies of TINAVI robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures |
title_short | Comparison of the efficacies of TINAVI robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for Levine–Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacies of tinavi robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for levine–edward type iia (postreduction) hangman fractures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10517983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43136-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lishuai comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures AT dujinpeng comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures AT huangyunfei comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures AT haodingjun comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures AT zhaozhigang comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures AT changzhen comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures AT zhujingwen comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures AT wangxiaodong comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures AT duanyongchao comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures AT hebaorong comparisonoftheefficaciesoftinavirobotassistedsurgeryandconventionalopensurgeryforlevineedwardtypeiiapostreductionhangmanfractures |