Cargando…

Specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the DNA double-strand break and subsequent selection

Most cancer-related chromosomal translocations appear to be cell type specific. It is currently unknown why different chromosomal translocations occur in different cells. This can be due to either the occurrence of particular translocations in specific cell types or adaptive survival advantage confe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Canoy, Reynand Jay, Shmakova, Anna, Karpukhina, Anna, Lomov, Nikolai, Tiukacheva, Eugenia, Kozhevnikova, Yana, André, Franck, Germini, Diego, Vassetzky, Yegor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/narcan/zcad049
_version_ 1785109429296824320
author Canoy, Reynand Jay
Shmakova, Anna
Karpukhina, Anna
Lomov, Nikolai
Tiukacheva, Eugenia
Kozhevnikova, Yana
André, Franck
Germini, Diego
Vassetzky, Yegor
author_facet Canoy, Reynand Jay
Shmakova, Anna
Karpukhina, Anna
Lomov, Nikolai
Tiukacheva, Eugenia
Kozhevnikova, Yana
André, Franck
Germini, Diego
Vassetzky, Yegor
author_sort Canoy, Reynand Jay
collection PubMed
description Most cancer-related chromosomal translocations appear to be cell type specific. It is currently unknown why different chromosomal translocations occur in different cells. This can be due to either the occurrence of particular translocations in specific cell types or adaptive survival advantage conferred by translocations only in specific cells. We experimentally addressed this question by double-strand break (DSB) induction at MYC, IGH, AML and ETO loci in the same cell to generate chromosomal translocations in different cell lineages. Our results show that any translocation can potentially arise in any cell type. We have analyzed different factors that could affect the frequency of the translocations, and only the spatial proximity between gene loci after the DSB induction correlated with the resulting translocation frequency, supporting the ‘breakage-first’ model. Furthermore, upon long-term culture of cells with the generated chromosomal translocations, only oncogenic MYC–IGH and AML–ETO translocations persisted over a 60-day period. Overall, the results suggest that chromosomal translocation can be generated after DSB induction in any type of cell, but whether the cell with the translocation would persist in a cell population depends on the cell type-specific selective survival advantage that the chromosomal translocation confers to the cell.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10518054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105180542023-09-25 Specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the DNA double-strand break and subsequent selection Canoy, Reynand Jay Shmakova, Anna Karpukhina, Anna Lomov, Nikolai Tiukacheva, Eugenia Kozhevnikova, Yana André, Franck Germini, Diego Vassetzky, Yegor NAR Cancer DNA Damage Sensing and Repair Most cancer-related chromosomal translocations appear to be cell type specific. It is currently unknown why different chromosomal translocations occur in different cells. This can be due to either the occurrence of particular translocations in specific cell types or adaptive survival advantage conferred by translocations only in specific cells. We experimentally addressed this question by double-strand break (DSB) induction at MYC, IGH, AML and ETO loci in the same cell to generate chromosomal translocations in different cell lineages. Our results show that any translocation can potentially arise in any cell type. We have analyzed different factors that could affect the frequency of the translocations, and only the spatial proximity between gene loci after the DSB induction correlated with the resulting translocation frequency, supporting the ‘breakage-first’ model. Furthermore, upon long-term culture of cells with the generated chromosomal translocations, only oncogenic MYC–IGH and AML–ETO translocations persisted over a 60-day period. Overall, the results suggest that chromosomal translocation can be generated after DSB induction in any type of cell, but whether the cell with the translocation would persist in a cell population depends on the cell type-specific selective survival advantage that the chromosomal translocation confers to the cell. Oxford University Press 2023-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10518054/ /pubmed/37750169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/narcan/zcad049 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Cancer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle DNA Damage Sensing and Repair
Canoy, Reynand Jay
Shmakova, Anna
Karpukhina, Anna
Lomov, Nikolai
Tiukacheva, Eugenia
Kozhevnikova, Yana
André, Franck
Germini, Diego
Vassetzky, Yegor
Specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the DNA double-strand break and subsequent selection
title Specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the DNA double-strand break and subsequent selection
title_full Specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the DNA double-strand break and subsequent selection
title_fullStr Specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the DNA double-strand break and subsequent selection
title_full_unstemmed Specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the DNA double-strand break and subsequent selection
title_short Specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the DNA double-strand break and subsequent selection
title_sort specificity of cancer-related chromosomal translocations is linked to proximity after the dna double-strand break and subsequent selection
topic DNA Damage Sensing and Repair
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/narcan/zcad049
work_keys_str_mv AT canoyreynandjay specificityofcancerrelatedchromosomaltranslocationsislinkedtoproximityafterthednadoublestrandbreakandsubsequentselection
AT shmakovaanna specificityofcancerrelatedchromosomaltranslocationsislinkedtoproximityafterthednadoublestrandbreakandsubsequentselection
AT karpukhinaanna specificityofcancerrelatedchromosomaltranslocationsislinkedtoproximityafterthednadoublestrandbreakandsubsequentselection
AT lomovnikolai specificityofcancerrelatedchromosomaltranslocationsislinkedtoproximityafterthednadoublestrandbreakandsubsequentselection
AT tiukachevaeugenia specificityofcancerrelatedchromosomaltranslocationsislinkedtoproximityafterthednadoublestrandbreakandsubsequentselection
AT kozhevnikovayana specificityofcancerrelatedchromosomaltranslocationsislinkedtoproximityafterthednadoublestrandbreakandsubsequentselection
AT andrefranck specificityofcancerrelatedchromosomaltranslocationsislinkedtoproximityafterthednadoublestrandbreakandsubsequentselection
AT germinidiego specificityofcancerrelatedchromosomaltranslocationsislinkedtoproximityafterthednadoublestrandbreakandsubsequentselection
AT vassetzkyyegor specificityofcancerrelatedchromosomaltranslocationsislinkedtoproximityafterthednadoublestrandbreakandsubsequentselection