Cargando…

Comparison of different surgical treatments for stage II progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of different procedures for stage IIA progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) through three-dimensional finite element models. METHODS: A previous validated stage IIA PCFD FEA model was established consisting of 16 bones, 56 ligam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Fanglin, Yuan, Chengjie, Liang, Mian, Le, Guoping, Xu, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04216-3
_version_ 1785109435182481408
author Chen, Fanglin
Yuan, Chengjie
Liang, Mian
Le, Guoping
Xu, Jian
author_facet Chen, Fanglin
Yuan, Chengjie
Liang, Mian
Le, Guoping
Xu, Jian
author_sort Chen, Fanglin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of different procedures for stage IIA progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) through three-dimensional finite element models. METHODS: A previous validated stage IIA PCFD FEA model was established consisting of 16 bones, 56 ligaments, 5 muscles and soft tissues. The ligament properties of the spring, deltoid, short plantar and long plantar ligaments, and plantar fascia were attenuated according to a previous publication. Medial column fusion (MCF), medializing calcaneal osteotomy (MCO), lateral column lengthening (LCL), and subtalar joint arthroereisis (SJA) operations were simulated in this model. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, maximum von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia that supported the medial longitudinal arch, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, and talonavicular coverage angle were all compared before and after simulated single-foot weight loading. RESULTS: The maximum plantar stress of PCFD decreased with MCO and SJA but increased with MCF and LCL. MCF and LCL failed to significantly reduce the stress on the medial column fragments, thereby increasing their stress. Both MCO and SJA relieved medial plantar stress. MCF had no significant effect on stress relief of the medial ligament. MCO, LCL, and SJA were all shown to reduce the pressure on the medial plantar ligament, with LCL having the most obvious effect. All four procedures corrected the arch deformity; however, MCF was not as effective as the other methods. SJA is the best method for restoring arch height and correcting arch deformities. For stage IIA PCFD, isolated MCF failed to reduce pressure on the medial column; however, isolated MCO significantly reduced the pressure on the medial plantar and ligamentous soft tissues while restoring the foot’s arch and correcting the hindfoot valgus. CONCLUSION: SJA with type II sinus tarsi implant effectively transferred pressure from the medial plantar tract to the lateral side and restored the arch. Isolated LCL was not found suitable for stage IIA PCFD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10518082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105180822023-09-25 Comparison of different surgical treatments for stage II progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis Chen, Fanglin Yuan, Chengjie Liang, Mian Le, Guoping Xu, Jian J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of different procedures for stage IIA progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) through three-dimensional finite element models. METHODS: A previous validated stage IIA PCFD FEA model was established consisting of 16 bones, 56 ligaments, 5 muscles and soft tissues. The ligament properties of the spring, deltoid, short plantar and long plantar ligaments, and plantar fascia were attenuated according to a previous publication. Medial column fusion (MCF), medializing calcaneal osteotomy (MCO), lateral column lengthening (LCL), and subtalar joint arthroereisis (SJA) operations were simulated in this model. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, maximum von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia that supported the medial longitudinal arch, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, and talonavicular coverage angle were all compared before and after simulated single-foot weight loading. RESULTS: The maximum plantar stress of PCFD decreased with MCO and SJA but increased with MCF and LCL. MCF and LCL failed to significantly reduce the stress on the medial column fragments, thereby increasing their stress. Both MCO and SJA relieved medial plantar stress. MCF had no significant effect on stress relief of the medial ligament. MCO, LCL, and SJA were all shown to reduce the pressure on the medial plantar ligament, with LCL having the most obvious effect. All four procedures corrected the arch deformity; however, MCF was not as effective as the other methods. SJA is the best method for restoring arch height and correcting arch deformities. For stage IIA PCFD, isolated MCF failed to reduce pressure on the medial column; however, isolated MCO significantly reduced the pressure on the medial plantar and ligamentous soft tissues while restoring the foot’s arch and correcting the hindfoot valgus. CONCLUSION: SJA with type II sinus tarsi implant effectively transferred pressure from the medial plantar tract to the lateral side and restored the arch. Isolated LCL was not found suitable for stage IIA PCFD. BioMed Central 2023-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10518082/ /pubmed/37741994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04216-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Fanglin
Yuan, Chengjie
Liang, Mian
Le, Guoping
Xu, Jian
Comparison of different surgical treatments for stage II progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis
title Comparison of different surgical treatments for stage II progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis
title_full Comparison of different surgical treatments for stage II progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of different surgical treatments for stage II progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different surgical treatments for stage II progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis
title_short Comparison of different surgical treatments for stage II progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis
title_sort comparison of different surgical treatments for stage ii progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04216-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chenfanglin comparisonofdifferentsurgicaltreatmentsforstageiiprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityafiniteelementanalysis
AT yuanchengjie comparisonofdifferentsurgicaltreatmentsforstageiiprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityafiniteelementanalysis
AT liangmian comparisonofdifferentsurgicaltreatmentsforstageiiprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityafiniteelementanalysis
AT leguoping comparisonofdifferentsurgicaltreatmentsforstageiiprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityafiniteelementanalysis
AT xujian comparisonofdifferentsurgicaltreatmentsforstageiiprogressivecollapsingfootdeformityafiniteelementanalysis