Cargando…
A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation
BACKGROUND: During the cochlear implantation procedure, the receiver/stimulator (R/S) part of the implant is fixated to prevent postoperative device migration, which could have an adverse effect on the position of the electrode array in the cochlea. We aim to compare the migration rates of two fixat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37743463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7 |
_version_ | 1785109439819284480 |
---|---|
author | Markodimitraki, Laura M. Harkel, Timen C. ten Bennink, Edwin Stegeman, Inge Thomeer, Hans G. X. M. |
author_facet | Markodimitraki, Laura M. Harkel, Timen C. ten Bennink, Edwin Stegeman, Inge Thomeer, Hans G. X. M. |
author_sort | Markodimitraki, Laura M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the cochlear implantation procedure, the receiver/stimulator (R/S) part of the implant is fixated to prevent postoperative device migration, which could have an adverse effect on the position of the electrode array in the cochlea. We aim to compare the migration rates of two fixation techniques, the bony recess versus the subperiosteal tight pocket without bony sutures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind randomized controlled trial will recruit a total of 112 primary cochlear implantation adult patients, eligible for implantation according to the current standard of practice. Randomization will be performed by an electronic data capture system Castor EDC, with participants block randomized to either bony recess or standard subperiosteal tight pocket in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age. The primary outcome of this study is the R/S device migration rate; secondary outcomes include patient-experienced burden using the validated COMPASS questionnaire, electrode migration rate, electrode impedance values, speech perception scores, correlation between R/S migration, electrode array migration and patient complaints, assessment of complication rates, and validation of an implant position measurement method. Data will be collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. All data analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: Cochlear implantation by means of creating a tight subperiosteal pocket without drilling a bony seat is a minimally invasive fixation technique with many advantages. However, the safety of this technique has not yet been proven with certainty. This is the first randomized controlled trial that directly compares the minimally invasive technique with the conventional method of drilling a bony seat. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL9698. Registered on 31 August 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10518101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105181012023-09-25 A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation Markodimitraki, Laura M. Harkel, Timen C. ten Bennink, Edwin Stegeman, Inge Thomeer, Hans G. X. M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: During the cochlear implantation procedure, the receiver/stimulator (R/S) part of the implant is fixated to prevent postoperative device migration, which could have an adverse effect on the position of the electrode array in the cochlea. We aim to compare the migration rates of two fixation techniques, the bony recess versus the subperiosteal tight pocket without bony sutures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind randomized controlled trial will recruit a total of 112 primary cochlear implantation adult patients, eligible for implantation according to the current standard of practice. Randomization will be performed by an electronic data capture system Castor EDC, with participants block randomized to either bony recess or standard subperiosteal tight pocket in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age. The primary outcome of this study is the R/S device migration rate; secondary outcomes include patient-experienced burden using the validated COMPASS questionnaire, electrode migration rate, electrode impedance values, speech perception scores, correlation between R/S migration, electrode array migration and patient complaints, assessment of complication rates, and validation of an implant position measurement method. Data will be collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. All data analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: Cochlear implantation by means of creating a tight subperiosteal pocket without drilling a bony seat is a minimally invasive fixation technique with many advantages. However, the safety of this technique has not yet been proven with certainty. This is the first randomized controlled trial that directly compares the minimally invasive technique with the conventional method of drilling a bony seat. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL9698. Registered on 31 August 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7. BioMed Central 2023-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10518101/ /pubmed/37743463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Markodimitraki, Laura M. Harkel, Timen C. ten Bennink, Edwin Stegeman, Inge Thomeer, Hans G. X. M. A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation |
title | A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation |
title_full | A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation |
title_fullStr | A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation |
title_short | A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation |
title_sort | monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (comfit) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37743463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markodimitrakilauram amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation AT harkeltimencten amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation AT benninkedwin amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation AT stegemaninge amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation AT thomeerhansgxm amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation AT markodimitrakilauram monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation AT harkeltimencten monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation AT benninkedwin monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation AT stegemaninge monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation AT thomeerhansgxm monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation |