Cargando…

A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation

BACKGROUND: During the cochlear implantation procedure, the receiver/stimulator (R/S) part of the implant is fixated to prevent postoperative device migration, which could have an adverse effect on the position of the electrode array in the cochlea. We aim to compare the migration rates of two fixat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markodimitraki, Laura M., Harkel, Timen C. ten, Bennink, Edwin, Stegeman, Inge, Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37743463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7
_version_ 1785109439819284480
author Markodimitraki, Laura M.
Harkel, Timen C. ten
Bennink, Edwin
Stegeman, Inge
Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.
author_facet Markodimitraki, Laura M.
Harkel, Timen C. ten
Bennink, Edwin
Stegeman, Inge
Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.
author_sort Markodimitraki, Laura M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the cochlear implantation procedure, the receiver/stimulator (R/S) part of the implant is fixated to prevent postoperative device migration, which could have an adverse effect on the position of the electrode array in the cochlea. We aim to compare the migration rates of two fixation techniques, the bony recess versus the subperiosteal tight pocket without bony sutures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind randomized controlled trial will recruit a total of 112 primary cochlear implantation adult patients, eligible for implantation according to the current standard of practice. Randomization will be performed by an electronic data capture system Castor EDC, with participants block randomized to either bony recess or standard subperiosteal tight pocket in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age. The primary outcome of this study is the R/S device migration rate; secondary outcomes include patient-experienced burden using the validated COMPASS questionnaire, electrode migration rate, electrode impedance values, speech perception scores, correlation between R/S migration, electrode array migration and patient complaints, assessment of complication rates, and validation of an implant position measurement method. Data will be collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. All data analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: Cochlear implantation by means of creating a tight subperiosteal pocket without drilling a bony seat is a minimally invasive fixation technique with many advantages. However, the safety of this technique has not yet been proven with certainty. This is the first randomized controlled trial that directly compares the minimally invasive technique with the conventional method of drilling a bony seat. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL9698. Registered on 31 August 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10518101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105181012023-09-25 A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation Markodimitraki, Laura M. Harkel, Timen C. ten Bennink, Edwin Stegeman, Inge Thomeer, Hans G. X. M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: During the cochlear implantation procedure, the receiver/stimulator (R/S) part of the implant is fixated to prevent postoperative device migration, which could have an adverse effect on the position of the electrode array in the cochlea. We aim to compare the migration rates of two fixation techniques, the bony recess versus the subperiosteal tight pocket without bony sutures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind randomized controlled trial will recruit a total of 112 primary cochlear implantation adult patients, eligible for implantation according to the current standard of practice. Randomization will be performed by an electronic data capture system Castor EDC, with participants block randomized to either bony recess or standard subperiosteal tight pocket in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age. The primary outcome of this study is the R/S device migration rate; secondary outcomes include patient-experienced burden using the validated COMPASS questionnaire, electrode migration rate, electrode impedance values, speech perception scores, correlation between R/S migration, electrode array migration and patient complaints, assessment of complication rates, and validation of an implant position measurement method. Data will be collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. All data analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: Cochlear implantation by means of creating a tight subperiosteal pocket without drilling a bony seat is a minimally invasive fixation technique with many advantages. However, the safety of this technique has not yet been proven with certainty. This is the first randomized controlled trial that directly compares the minimally invasive technique with the conventional method of drilling a bony seat. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NL9698. Registered on 31 August 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7. BioMed Central 2023-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10518101/ /pubmed/37743463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Markodimitraki, Laura M.
Harkel, Timen C. ten
Bennink, Edwin
Stegeman, Inge
Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.
A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation
title A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation
title_full A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation
title_fullStr A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation
title_full_unstemmed A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation
title_short A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation
title_sort monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (comfit) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37743463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7
work_keys_str_mv AT markodimitrakilauram amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation
AT harkeltimencten amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation
AT benninkedwin amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation
AT stegemaninge amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation
AT thomeerhansgxm amonocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation
AT markodimitrakilauram monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation
AT harkeltimencten monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation
AT benninkedwin monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation
AT stegemaninge monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation
AT thomeerhansgxm monocenterpatientblindedrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferioritystudytocomparecochlearimplantreceiverstimulatordevicefixationtechniquescomfitwithandwithoutdrillinginadultseligibleforprimarycochlearimplantation