Cargando…

Almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: This study mainly observes the efficacy and safety of almonertinib plus chemotherapy compared with almonertinib alone in the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). METHODS: In this study, clinical data of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Xiaoxu, Xiang, Yan, Lu, Kaihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1248690
_version_ 1785109505191706624
author Fang, Xiaoxu
Xiang, Yan
Lu, Kaihua
author_facet Fang, Xiaoxu
Xiang, Yan
Lu, Kaihua
author_sort Fang, Xiaoxu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study mainly observes the efficacy and safety of almonertinib plus chemotherapy compared with almonertinib alone in the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). METHODS: In this study, clinical data of 68 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated in Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital and Nanjing Chest Hospital between April 2020 and December 2022 were collected. Among them, the study group (n=30) received second-line almonertinib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, while the control group (n=38) received almonertinib alone. The near-term and long-term effects and adverse events of the two groups were compared respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time until 31 December 2022 was 16.3 months (95% CI: 11.32-21.34). Results of chi-square analysis showed no statistically significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) between the study group and the control group (56.73% vs. 55.3%, P>0.05; 100% vs. 86.8%, P>0.05). Log-rank test comparing the two groups revealed that the median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the study group was significantly longer than that of the control group by 3.1 months (12.7 vs. 9.6 months, P=0.01). Multivariate COX proportional risk model showed a statistically significant effect of treatment method and PS score on PFS (HR=0.43, P=0.023; HR=3.82, P=0.001). In terms of safety, most of the adverse events (AEs) were mild, with no grade 4-5 in the two groups, and the overall tolerance of patients was good. CONCLUSION: For advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, second-line treatment with almonertinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS compared with almonertinib alone without a significant increase in adverse events, providing efficacy and safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10518400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105184002023-09-26 Almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study Fang, Xiaoxu Xiang, Yan Lu, Kaihua Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study mainly observes the efficacy and safety of almonertinib plus chemotherapy compared with almonertinib alone in the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). METHODS: In this study, clinical data of 68 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated in Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital and Nanjing Chest Hospital between April 2020 and December 2022 were collected. Among them, the study group (n=30) received second-line almonertinib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, while the control group (n=38) received almonertinib alone. The near-term and long-term effects and adverse events of the two groups were compared respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time until 31 December 2022 was 16.3 months (95% CI: 11.32-21.34). Results of chi-square analysis showed no statistically significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) between the study group and the control group (56.73% vs. 55.3%, P>0.05; 100% vs. 86.8%, P>0.05). Log-rank test comparing the two groups revealed that the median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the study group was significantly longer than that of the control group by 3.1 months (12.7 vs. 9.6 months, P=0.01). Multivariate COX proportional risk model showed a statistically significant effect of treatment method and PS score on PFS (HR=0.43, P=0.023; HR=3.82, P=0.001). In terms of safety, most of the adverse events (AEs) were mild, with no grade 4-5 in the two groups, and the overall tolerance of patients was good. CONCLUSION: For advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, second-line treatment with almonertinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS compared with almonertinib alone without a significant increase in adverse events, providing efficacy and safety. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10518400/ /pubmed/37752994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1248690 Text en Copyright © 2023 Fang, Xiang and Lu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Fang, Xiaoxu
Xiang, Yan
Lu, Kaihua
Almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study
title Almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study
title_full Almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study
title_short Almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study
title_sort almonertinib plus chemotherapy versus almonertinib alone in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor: a retrospective study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1248690
work_keys_str_mv AT fangxiaoxu almonertinibpluschemotherapyversusalmonertinibaloneinsecondlinetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoraretrospectivestudy
AT xiangyan almonertinibpluschemotherapyversusalmonertinibaloneinsecondlinetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoraretrospectivestudy
AT lukaihua almonertinibpluschemotherapyversusalmonertinibaloneinsecondlinetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedepidermalgrowthfactorreceptoraretrospectivestudy