Cargando…

Positive Rate and Utility of Blood Culture among Nursing and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Inpatients: A Cross-sectional Study

OBJECTIVE: Although blood cultures to identify the presence of bacteremia are recommended for nursing- and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP), the incidence of true bacteremia and the relationship between true bacteremia and the outcome remain unclear. Physicians can therefore sometimes be conf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shiota, Seiji, Horinouchi, Noboru, Eto, Yuki, Oshiumi, Taro, Ishii, Toshihiro, Takakura, Takeshi, Miyazaki, Eishi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36631095
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.1008-22
_version_ 1785109536480165888
author Shiota, Seiji
Horinouchi, Noboru
Eto, Yuki
Oshiumi, Taro
Ishii, Toshihiro
Takakura, Takeshi
Miyazaki, Eishi
author_facet Shiota, Seiji
Horinouchi, Noboru
Eto, Yuki
Oshiumi, Taro
Ishii, Toshihiro
Takakura, Takeshi
Miyazaki, Eishi
author_sort Shiota, Seiji
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Although blood cultures to identify the presence of bacteremia are recommended for nursing- and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP), the incidence of true bacteremia and the relationship between true bacteremia and the outcome remain unclear. Physicians can therefore sometimes be confused regarding whether or not blood cultures should be obtained for NHCAP patients. This study assessed the incidence of true bacteremia and the relationship between true bacteremia and the outcome of NHCAP in a Japanese hospital setting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed NHCAP patients hospitalized between April 2016 and March 2021. The primary outcome was the incidence of true bacteremia in blood cultures. The incidence of true bacteremia was also examined according to quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and A-DROP scores. In addition, we compared the incidence of true bacteremia between survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: In total, 205 patients were included in this study. Blood cultures were obtained from 150 of the 205 patients (73.2%). Positive blood cultures were detected in 26 patients (17.3%), of which only 8 cases (5.3%; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-10.2%) were considered true bacteremia. Trend analyses for the incidence of true bacteremia according to qSOFA and A-DROP scores did not show any statistically significant results (p=0.49 for qSOFA; p=0.14 for A-DROP). The proportion of true bacteremia cases did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of true bacteremia among NHCAP patients was very low. A strategy for determining indications for obtaining blood cultures from NHCAP patients needs to be established.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10518538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105185382023-09-26 Positive Rate and Utility of Blood Culture among Nursing and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Inpatients: A Cross-sectional Study Shiota, Seiji Horinouchi, Noboru Eto, Yuki Oshiumi, Taro Ishii, Toshihiro Takakura, Takeshi Miyazaki, Eishi Intern Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: Although blood cultures to identify the presence of bacteremia are recommended for nursing- and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP), the incidence of true bacteremia and the relationship between true bacteremia and the outcome remain unclear. Physicians can therefore sometimes be confused regarding whether or not blood cultures should be obtained for NHCAP patients. This study assessed the incidence of true bacteremia and the relationship between true bacteremia and the outcome of NHCAP in a Japanese hospital setting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed NHCAP patients hospitalized between April 2016 and March 2021. The primary outcome was the incidence of true bacteremia in blood cultures. The incidence of true bacteremia was also examined according to quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and A-DROP scores. In addition, we compared the incidence of true bacteremia between survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: In total, 205 patients were included in this study. Blood cultures were obtained from 150 of the 205 patients (73.2%). Positive blood cultures were detected in 26 patients (17.3%), of which only 8 cases (5.3%; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-10.2%) were considered true bacteremia. Trend analyses for the incidence of true bacteremia according to qSOFA and A-DROP scores did not show any statistically significant results (p=0.49 for qSOFA; p=0.14 for A-DROP). The proportion of true bacteremia cases did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of true bacteremia among NHCAP patients was very low. A strategy for determining indications for obtaining blood cultures from NHCAP patients needs to be established. The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2023-01-12 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10518538/ /pubmed/36631095 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.1008-22 Text en Copyright © 2023 by The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/The Internal Medicine is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Shiota, Seiji
Horinouchi, Noboru
Eto, Yuki
Oshiumi, Taro
Ishii, Toshihiro
Takakura, Takeshi
Miyazaki, Eishi
Positive Rate and Utility of Blood Culture among Nursing and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Inpatients: A Cross-sectional Study
title Positive Rate and Utility of Blood Culture among Nursing and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Inpatients: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full Positive Rate and Utility of Blood Culture among Nursing and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Inpatients: A Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Positive Rate and Utility of Blood Culture among Nursing and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Inpatients: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Positive Rate and Utility of Blood Culture among Nursing and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Inpatients: A Cross-sectional Study
title_short Positive Rate and Utility of Blood Culture among Nursing and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Inpatients: A Cross-sectional Study
title_sort positive rate and utility of blood culture among nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia inpatients: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36631095
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.1008-22
work_keys_str_mv AT shiotaseiji positiverateandutilityofbloodcultureamongnursingandhealthcareassociatedpneumoniainpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT horinouchinoboru positiverateandutilityofbloodcultureamongnursingandhealthcareassociatedpneumoniainpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT etoyuki positiverateandutilityofbloodcultureamongnursingandhealthcareassociatedpneumoniainpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT oshiumitaro positiverateandutilityofbloodcultureamongnursingandhealthcareassociatedpneumoniainpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT ishiitoshihiro positiverateandutilityofbloodcultureamongnursingandhealthcareassociatedpneumoniainpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT takakuratakeshi positiverateandutilityofbloodcultureamongnursingandhealthcareassociatedpneumoniainpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT miyazakieishi positiverateandutilityofbloodcultureamongnursingandhealthcareassociatedpneumoniainpatientsacrosssectionalstudy