Cargando…
Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination
BACKGROUND: While vaccines have established utility against COVID-19, phase 3 efficacy studies have generally not comprehensively evaluated protection provided by previous infection or hybrid immunity (previous infection plus vaccination). Individual patient data from US government-supported harmoni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37738833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104799 |
_version_ | 1785109543466827776 |
---|---|
author | Rick, Anne-Marie Laurens, Matthew B. Huang, Ying Yu, Chenchen Martin, Thomas C.S. Rodriguez, Carina A. Rostad, Christina A. Maboa, Rebone M. Baden, Lindsey R. El Sahly, Hana M. Grinsztejn, Beatriz Gray, Glenda E. Gay, Cynthia L. Gilbert, Peter B. Janes, Holly E. Kublin, James G. Huang, Yunda Leav, Brett Hirsch, Ian Struyf, Frank Dunkle, Lisa M. Neuzil, Kathleen M. Corey, Lawrence Goepfert, Paul A. Walsh, Stephen R. Follmann, Dean Kotloff, Karen L. |
author_facet | Rick, Anne-Marie Laurens, Matthew B. Huang, Ying Yu, Chenchen Martin, Thomas C.S. Rodriguez, Carina A. Rostad, Christina A. Maboa, Rebone M. Baden, Lindsey R. El Sahly, Hana M. Grinsztejn, Beatriz Gray, Glenda E. Gay, Cynthia L. Gilbert, Peter B. Janes, Holly E. Kublin, James G. Huang, Yunda Leav, Brett Hirsch, Ian Struyf, Frank Dunkle, Lisa M. Neuzil, Kathleen M. Corey, Lawrence Goepfert, Paul A. Walsh, Stephen R. Follmann, Dean Kotloff, Karen L. |
author_sort | Rick, Anne-Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While vaccines have established utility against COVID-19, phase 3 efficacy studies have generally not comprehensively evaluated protection provided by previous infection or hybrid immunity (previous infection plus vaccination). Individual patient data from US government-supported harmonized vaccine trials provide an unprecedented sample population to address this issue. We characterized the protective efficacy of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against COVID-19 early in the pandemic over three-to six-month follow-up and compared with vaccine-associated protection. METHODS: In this post-hoc cross-protocol analysis of the Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, we allocated participants into four groups based on previous-infection status at enrolment and treatment: no previous infection/placebo; previous infection/placebo; no previous infection/vaccine; and previous infection/vaccine. The main outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 >7–15 days (per original protocols) after final study injection. We calculated crude and adjusted efficacy measures. FINDINGS: Previous infection/placebo participants had a 92% decreased risk of future COVID-19 compared to no previous infection/placebo participants (overall hazard ratio [HR] ratio: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05–0.13). Among single-dose Janssen participants, hybrid immunity conferred greater protection than vaccine alone (HR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01–0.10). Too few infections were observed to draw statistical inferences comparing hybrid immunity to vaccine alone for other trials. Vaccination, previous infection, and hybrid immunity all provided near-complete protection against severe disease. INTERPRETATION: Previous infection, any hybrid immunity, and two-dose vaccination all provided substantial protection against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 through the early Delta period. Thus, as a surrogate for natural infection, vaccination remains the safest approach to protection. FUNDING: 10.13039/100000002National Institutes of Health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10518569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105185692023-09-26 Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination Rick, Anne-Marie Laurens, Matthew B. Huang, Ying Yu, Chenchen Martin, Thomas C.S. Rodriguez, Carina A. Rostad, Christina A. Maboa, Rebone M. Baden, Lindsey R. El Sahly, Hana M. Grinsztejn, Beatriz Gray, Glenda E. Gay, Cynthia L. Gilbert, Peter B. Janes, Holly E. Kublin, James G. Huang, Yunda Leav, Brett Hirsch, Ian Struyf, Frank Dunkle, Lisa M. Neuzil, Kathleen M. Corey, Lawrence Goepfert, Paul A. Walsh, Stephen R. Follmann, Dean Kotloff, Karen L. eBioMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: While vaccines have established utility against COVID-19, phase 3 efficacy studies have generally not comprehensively evaluated protection provided by previous infection or hybrid immunity (previous infection plus vaccination). Individual patient data from US government-supported harmonized vaccine trials provide an unprecedented sample population to address this issue. We characterized the protective efficacy of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against COVID-19 early in the pandemic over three-to six-month follow-up and compared with vaccine-associated protection. METHODS: In this post-hoc cross-protocol analysis of the Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, we allocated participants into four groups based on previous-infection status at enrolment and treatment: no previous infection/placebo; previous infection/placebo; no previous infection/vaccine; and previous infection/vaccine. The main outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 >7–15 days (per original protocols) after final study injection. We calculated crude and adjusted efficacy measures. FINDINGS: Previous infection/placebo participants had a 92% decreased risk of future COVID-19 compared to no previous infection/placebo participants (overall hazard ratio [HR] ratio: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05–0.13). Among single-dose Janssen participants, hybrid immunity conferred greater protection than vaccine alone (HR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01–0.10). Too few infections were observed to draw statistical inferences comparing hybrid immunity to vaccine alone for other trials. Vaccination, previous infection, and hybrid immunity all provided near-complete protection against severe disease. INTERPRETATION: Previous infection, any hybrid immunity, and two-dose vaccination all provided substantial protection against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 through the early Delta period. Thus, as a surrogate for natural infection, vaccination remains the safest approach to protection. FUNDING: 10.13039/100000002National Institutes of Health. Elsevier 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10518569/ /pubmed/37738833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104799 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Rick, Anne-Marie Laurens, Matthew B. Huang, Ying Yu, Chenchen Martin, Thomas C.S. Rodriguez, Carina A. Rostad, Christina A. Maboa, Rebone M. Baden, Lindsey R. El Sahly, Hana M. Grinsztejn, Beatriz Gray, Glenda E. Gay, Cynthia L. Gilbert, Peter B. Janes, Holly E. Kublin, James G. Huang, Yunda Leav, Brett Hirsch, Ian Struyf, Frank Dunkle, Lisa M. Neuzil, Kathleen M. Corey, Lawrence Goepfert, Paul A. Walsh, Stephen R. Follmann, Dean Kotloff, Karen L. Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination |
title | Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination |
title_full | Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination |
title_fullStr | Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination |
title_short | Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination |
title_sort | risk of covid-19 after natural infection or vaccination |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37738833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104799 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rickannemarie riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT laurensmatthewb riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT huangying riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT yuchenchen riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT martinthomascs riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT rodriguezcarinaa riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT rostadchristinaa riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT maboarebonem riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT badenlindseyr riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT elsahlyhanam riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT grinsztejnbeatriz riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT grayglendae riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT gaycynthial riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT gilbertpeterb riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT janeshollye riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT kublinjamesg riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT huangyunda riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT leavbrett riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT hirschian riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT struyffrank riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT dunklelisam riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT neuzilkathleenm riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT coreylawrence riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT goepfertpaula riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT walshstephenr riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT follmanndean riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT kotloffkarenl riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination AT riskofcovid19afternaturalinfectionorvaccination |