Cargando…

CLINICAL AND HEALTHCARE IMPACTS OF PORTABLE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN AMBULATORY CARE MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION CONSULTATIONS

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the impact of Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in musculoskeletal consultations out of hospital using a Philips Lumify portable ultrasound device. We aimed to determine the impact of POCUS on the number of hospital referrals for injections as well as on the number of injectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DE LA LAMA, Jose M., MORALES, Manuel, DE NICOLAS, Juan, UCIN, Andrea, GALVAN, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Journals Sweden AB 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753354
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrmcc.v6.6573
_version_ 1785109589051572224
author DE LA LAMA, Jose M.
MORALES, Manuel
DE NICOLAS, Juan
UCIN, Andrea
GALVAN, Antonio
author_facet DE LA LAMA, Jose M.
MORALES, Manuel
DE NICOLAS, Juan
UCIN, Andrea
GALVAN, Antonio
author_sort DE LA LAMA, Jose M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the impact of Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in musculoskeletal consultations out of hospital using a Philips Lumify portable ultrasound device. We aimed to determine the impact of POCUS on the number of hospital referrals for injections as well as on the number of injections performed in consultation. DESIGN: Retrospective case study comparing 2 periods: June to September 2021 (pre-POCUS) and November 2021 to February 2022 (POCUS). Statistical comparisons were performed using the χ(2). In both periods, 21 medical consultations were performed. In the pre-POCUS period, 470 patients were assessed, with an average of 1.29 hospital referrals made per day of consultation for hospital injections and an average of 2.05 injections performed per day of medical consultation. In the POCUS period, 589 patients were assessed, with an average of 0.1 hospital referrals per day (−92.6%; p < 0.00001) and an average of 2.76 injections performed per day (+34.9%; p < 0.00001). The introduction of POCUS at our practice reduced the number of hospital referrals made for injections and increased the number of injections performed every day of consultation. CONCLUSION: This suggests that POCUS is of great clinical value in out-of-hospital musculoskeletal rehabilitation consultations. Lay Abstract This study provides insight into the clinical impact of portable ultrasound in rehabilitation consultations performed out of the Hospital in a Primary care center. The aims of this study are to measure the number of hospital referrals for therapeutic injections as well as on the number of injections performed in every consultation. In this study, 2 periods were compared. It was found that the introduction of POCUS at our practice reduced the number of hospital referrals to perform challenging injections and increased the number of injections performed during consultations. Portable ultrasound appears to be of clinical value in musculoskeletal rehabilitation consultations performed out of hospital settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10518771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Medical Journals Sweden AB
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105187712023-09-26 CLINICAL AND HEALTHCARE IMPACTS OF PORTABLE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN AMBULATORY CARE MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION CONSULTATIONS DE LA LAMA, Jose M. MORALES, Manuel DE NICOLAS, Juan UCIN, Andrea GALVAN, Antonio J Rehabil Med Clin Commun Original Report OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the impact of Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in musculoskeletal consultations out of hospital using a Philips Lumify portable ultrasound device. We aimed to determine the impact of POCUS on the number of hospital referrals for injections as well as on the number of injections performed in consultation. DESIGN: Retrospective case study comparing 2 periods: June to September 2021 (pre-POCUS) and November 2021 to February 2022 (POCUS). Statistical comparisons were performed using the χ(2). In both periods, 21 medical consultations were performed. In the pre-POCUS period, 470 patients were assessed, with an average of 1.29 hospital referrals made per day of consultation for hospital injections and an average of 2.05 injections performed per day of medical consultation. In the POCUS period, 589 patients were assessed, with an average of 0.1 hospital referrals per day (−92.6%; p < 0.00001) and an average of 2.76 injections performed per day (+34.9%; p < 0.00001). The introduction of POCUS at our practice reduced the number of hospital referrals made for injections and increased the number of injections performed every day of consultation. CONCLUSION: This suggests that POCUS is of great clinical value in out-of-hospital musculoskeletal rehabilitation consultations. Lay Abstract This study provides insight into the clinical impact of portable ultrasound in rehabilitation consultations performed out of the Hospital in a Primary care center. The aims of this study are to measure the number of hospital referrals for therapeutic injections as well as on the number of injections performed in every consultation. In this study, 2 periods were compared. It was found that the introduction of POCUS at our practice reduced the number of hospital referrals to perform challenging injections and increased the number of injections performed during consultations. Portable ultrasound appears to be of clinical value in musculoskeletal rehabilitation consultations performed out of hospital settings. Medical Journals Sweden AB 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10518771/ /pubmed/37753354 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrmcc.v6.6573 Text en © Published by Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Foundation for Rehabilitation Information https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Report
DE LA LAMA, Jose M.
MORALES, Manuel
DE NICOLAS, Juan
UCIN, Andrea
GALVAN, Antonio
CLINICAL AND HEALTHCARE IMPACTS OF PORTABLE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN AMBULATORY CARE MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION CONSULTATIONS
title CLINICAL AND HEALTHCARE IMPACTS OF PORTABLE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN AMBULATORY CARE MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION CONSULTATIONS
title_full CLINICAL AND HEALTHCARE IMPACTS OF PORTABLE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN AMBULATORY CARE MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION CONSULTATIONS
title_fullStr CLINICAL AND HEALTHCARE IMPACTS OF PORTABLE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN AMBULATORY CARE MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION CONSULTATIONS
title_full_unstemmed CLINICAL AND HEALTHCARE IMPACTS OF PORTABLE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN AMBULATORY CARE MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION CONSULTATIONS
title_short CLINICAL AND HEALTHCARE IMPACTS OF PORTABLE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN AMBULATORY CARE MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION CONSULTATIONS
title_sort clinical and healthcare impacts of portable ultrasonography in ambulatory care musculoskeletal rehabilitation consultations
topic Original Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753354
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrmcc.v6.6573
work_keys_str_mv AT delalamajosem clinicalandhealthcareimpactsofportableultrasonographyinambulatorycaremusculoskeletalrehabilitationconsultations
AT moralesmanuel clinicalandhealthcareimpactsofportableultrasonographyinambulatorycaremusculoskeletalrehabilitationconsultations
AT denicolasjuan clinicalandhealthcareimpactsofportableultrasonographyinambulatorycaremusculoskeletalrehabilitationconsultations
AT ucinandrea clinicalandhealthcareimpactsofportableultrasonographyinambulatorycaremusculoskeletalrehabilitationconsultations
AT galvanantonio clinicalandhealthcareimpactsofportableultrasonographyinambulatorycaremusculoskeletalrehabilitationconsultations