Cargando…

What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review

Background: Recruitment challenges are a barrier to the conduct of trials in general practice, yet little is known about which recruitment strategies work best to recruit practices for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to describe the types of strategies used to recruit general practices...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckley, Daire, McHugh, Sheena M., Riordan, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753269
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13650.1
_version_ 1785109605464932352
author Buckley, Daire
McHugh, Sheena M.
Riordan, Fiona
author_facet Buckley, Daire
McHugh, Sheena M.
Riordan, Fiona
author_sort Buckley, Daire
collection PubMed
description Background: Recruitment challenges are a barrier to the conduct of trials in general practice, yet little is known about which recruitment strategies work best to recruit practices for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to describe the types of strategies used to recruit general practices for trials and synthesize any available evidence of effectiveness. Methods: We conducted a rapid evidence review in line with guidance from Tricco et al. Eligible studies reported or evaluated any strategy to improve practice recruitment to participate in clinical or implementation RCTs. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Library were searched from inception to June 22 (nd), 2021. Reference lists of included studies were screened. Data were synthesized narratively. Results: Over 9,162 articles were identified, and 19 studies included. Most (n=13, 66.7%) used a single recruitment strategy. The most common strategies were: in-person practice meetings/visits by the research team (n=12, 63.2%); phone calls (n=10, 52.6%); financial incentives (n=9, 47.4%); personalised emails (n=7, 36.8%) or letters (n=6, 52.6%) (as opposed to email ‘blasts’ or generic letters); targeting practices that participated in previous studies or with which the team had existing links (n=6, 31.6%) or targeting of practices within an existing practice or research network (n=6, 31.6%).  Three studies reporting recruitment rates >80%, used strategies such as invitation letters with a follow-up phone call to non-responders, presentations by the principal investigator and study coordinator, or in-person meetings with practices with an existing affiliation with the University or research team.  Conclusions: Few studies directly compared recruitment approaches making it difficult to draw conclusions about their comparative effectiveness. However, the role of more personalised letter/email, in-person, or phone contact, and capitalising on existing relationships appears important. Further work is needed to standardise how recruitment methods are reported and to directly compare different recruitment strategies within one study . PROSPERO registration: CRD42021268140 (15/08/2021)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10518848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105188482023-09-26 What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review Buckley, Daire McHugh, Sheena M. Riordan, Fiona HRB Open Res Systematic Review Background: Recruitment challenges are a barrier to the conduct of trials in general practice, yet little is known about which recruitment strategies work best to recruit practices for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to describe the types of strategies used to recruit general practices for trials and synthesize any available evidence of effectiveness. Methods: We conducted a rapid evidence review in line with guidance from Tricco et al. Eligible studies reported or evaluated any strategy to improve practice recruitment to participate in clinical or implementation RCTs. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Library were searched from inception to June 22 (nd), 2021. Reference lists of included studies were screened. Data were synthesized narratively. Results: Over 9,162 articles were identified, and 19 studies included. Most (n=13, 66.7%) used a single recruitment strategy. The most common strategies were: in-person practice meetings/visits by the research team (n=12, 63.2%); phone calls (n=10, 52.6%); financial incentives (n=9, 47.4%); personalised emails (n=7, 36.8%) or letters (n=6, 52.6%) (as opposed to email ‘blasts’ or generic letters); targeting practices that participated in previous studies or with which the team had existing links (n=6, 31.6%) or targeting of practices within an existing practice or research network (n=6, 31.6%).  Three studies reporting recruitment rates >80%, used strategies such as invitation letters with a follow-up phone call to non-responders, presentations by the principal investigator and study coordinator, or in-person meetings with practices with an existing affiliation with the University or research team.  Conclusions: Few studies directly compared recruitment approaches making it difficult to draw conclusions about their comparative effectiveness. However, the role of more personalised letter/email, in-person, or phone contact, and capitalising on existing relationships appears important. Further work is needed to standardise how recruitment methods are reported and to directly compare different recruitment strategies within one study . PROSPERO registration: CRD42021268140 (15/08/2021) F1000 Research Limited 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10518848/ /pubmed/37753269 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13650.1 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Buckley D et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Buckley, Daire
McHugh, Sheena M.
Riordan, Fiona
What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review
title What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review
title_full What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review
title_fullStr What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review
title_full_unstemmed What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review
title_short What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review
title_sort what works to recruit general practices to trials? a rapid review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10518848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753269
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13650.1
work_keys_str_mv AT buckleydaire whatworkstorecruitgeneralpracticestotrialsarapidreview
AT mchughsheenam whatworkstorecruitgeneralpracticestotrialsarapidreview
AT riordanfiona whatworkstorecruitgeneralpracticestotrialsarapidreview