Cargando…

Comparison of dental flosses – an investigation of subjective preference and mechanical properties

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the properties (tensile strength, roughness, abrasiveness) of different dental flosses and how these properties relate to subjective preference for floss by users. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Four flosses of differing compositions were selected (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), ny...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Zhongjin, Broadbent, Jonathan M., Choi, Joanne Jung Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2258919
_version_ 1785109665808384000
author Huang, Zhongjin
Broadbent, Jonathan M.
Choi, Joanne Jung Eun
author_facet Huang, Zhongjin
Broadbent, Jonathan M.
Choi, Joanne Jung Eun
author_sort Huang, Zhongjin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the properties (tensile strength, roughness, abrasiveness) of different dental flosses and how these properties relate to subjective preference for floss by users. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Four flosses of differing compositions were selected (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), nylon, silk, and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)). Tensile strength (TS) was measured utilising a universal testing machine (total n = 40). Surface roughness (Ra) was measured on 3D reconstructed models of scanning electron microscope and abrasiveness was measured through block-on-ring tests against human enamel. Subjective preference for floss was measured by asking a sample of 16 individuals to use each floss for an 8-day period using a split-mouth design. RESULTS: The highest TS was found in UHMWPE floss (194.18[Image: see text] 24.61 MPa) while the lowest TS was found in PTFE floss (11.78[Image: see text] 0.77 MPa). Silk floss had the highest Ra (0.304[Image: see text] 0.025 µm) while PTFE floss had the lowest (0.048[Image: see text] 0.003 µm). In-vitro abrasion testing of the flosses identified no significant differences between the flosses in causing wear on tooth enamel. Subjective ratings of flosses indicated PTFE floss to be most preferred and nylon floss to be least preferred. CONCLUSION: There was a difference in subjective preference between dental flosses composed of different materials. The PTFE floss was the overall most preferred while the nylon floss was the least preferred. There was also an association between the mechanical properties and preference for their usage, with PTFE floss being the most preferred but having the lowest surface roughness and tensile strength. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study compared a wide range of mechanical properties and subject preferences of commercially available dental floss. The results of this study can provide guidance for the recommendation of dental floss for oral hygiene routines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10519255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105192552023-09-26 Comparison of dental flosses – an investigation of subjective preference and mechanical properties Huang, Zhongjin Broadbent, Jonathan M. Choi, Joanne Jung Eun Biomater Investig Dent Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the properties (tensile strength, roughness, abrasiveness) of different dental flosses and how these properties relate to subjective preference for floss by users. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Four flosses of differing compositions were selected (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), nylon, silk, and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)). Tensile strength (TS) was measured utilising a universal testing machine (total n = 40). Surface roughness (Ra) was measured on 3D reconstructed models of scanning electron microscope and abrasiveness was measured through block-on-ring tests against human enamel. Subjective preference for floss was measured by asking a sample of 16 individuals to use each floss for an 8-day period using a split-mouth design. RESULTS: The highest TS was found in UHMWPE floss (194.18[Image: see text] 24.61 MPa) while the lowest TS was found in PTFE floss (11.78[Image: see text] 0.77 MPa). Silk floss had the highest Ra (0.304[Image: see text] 0.025 µm) while PTFE floss had the lowest (0.048[Image: see text] 0.003 µm). In-vitro abrasion testing of the flosses identified no significant differences between the flosses in causing wear on tooth enamel. Subjective ratings of flosses indicated PTFE floss to be most preferred and nylon floss to be least preferred. CONCLUSION: There was a difference in subjective preference between dental flosses composed of different materials. The PTFE floss was the overall most preferred while the nylon floss was the least preferred. There was also an association between the mechanical properties and preference for their usage, with PTFE floss being the most preferred but having the lowest surface roughness and tensile strength. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study compared a wide range of mechanical properties and subject preferences of commercially available dental floss. The results of this study can provide guidance for the recommendation of dental floss for oral hygiene routines. Taylor & Francis 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10519255/ /pubmed/37753304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2258919 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Zhongjin
Broadbent, Jonathan M.
Choi, Joanne Jung Eun
Comparison of dental flosses – an investigation of subjective preference and mechanical properties
title Comparison of dental flosses – an investigation of subjective preference and mechanical properties
title_full Comparison of dental flosses – an investigation of subjective preference and mechanical properties
title_fullStr Comparison of dental flosses – an investigation of subjective preference and mechanical properties
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of dental flosses – an investigation of subjective preference and mechanical properties
title_short Comparison of dental flosses – an investigation of subjective preference and mechanical properties
title_sort comparison of dental flosses – an investigation of subjective preference and mechanical properties
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2258919
work_keys_str_mv AT huangzhongjin comparisonofdentalflossesaninvestigationofsubjectivepreferenceandmechanicalproperties
AT broadbentjonathanm comparisonofdentalflossesaninvestigationofsubjectivepreferenceandmechanicalproperties
AT choijoannejungeun comparisonofdentalflossesaninvestigationofsubjectivepreferenceandmechanicalproperties