Cargando…
Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation
Fear conditioning is a laboratory paradigm commonly used to investigate aversive learning and memory. In context fear conditioning, a configuration of elemental cues (conditioned stimulus [CTX]) predicts an aversive event (unconditioned stimulus [US]). To quantify context fear acquisition in humans,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.053781.123 |
_version_ | 1785109692146515968 |
---|---|
author | Xia, Yanfang Wehrli, Jelena Gerster, Samuel Kroes, Marijn Houtekamer, Maxime Bach, Dominik R. |
author_facet | Xia, Yanfang Wehrli, Jelena Gerster, Samuel Kroes, Marijn Houtekamer, Maxime Bach, Dominik R. |
author_sort | Xia, Yanfang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fear conditioning is a laboratory paradigm commonly used to investigate aversive learning and memory. In context fear conditioning, a configuration of elemental cues (conditioned stimulus [CTX]) predicts an aversive event (unconditioned stimulus [US]). To quantify context fear acquisition in humans, previous work has used startle eyeblink responses (SEBRs), skin conductance responses (SCRs), and verbal reports, but different quantification methods have rarely been compared. Moreover, preclinical intervention studies mandate recall tests several days after acquisition, and it is unclear how to induce and measure context fear memory retention over such a time interval. First, we used a semi-immersive virtual reality paradigm. In two experiments (N = 23 and N = 28), we found successful declarative learning and memory retention over 7 d but no evidence of other conditioned responses. Next, we used a configural fear conditioning paradigm with five static room images as CTXs in two experiments (N = 29 and N = 24). Besides successful declarative learning and memory retention after 7 d, SCR and pupil dilation in response to CTX onset differentiated CTX(+)/CTX(−) during acquisition training, and SEBR and pupil dilation differentiated CTX(+)/CTX(−) during the recall test, with medium to large effect sizes for the most sensitive indices (SEBR: Hedge's g = 0.56 and g = 0.69; pupil dilation: Hedge's g = 0.99 and g = 0.88). Our results demonstrate that with a configural learning paradigm, context fear memory retention can be demonstrated over 7 d, and we provide robust and replicable measurement methods to this end. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10519410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105194102023-09-26 Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation Xia, Yanfang Wehrli, Jelena Gerster, Samuel Kroes, Marijn Houtekamer, Maxime Bach, Dominik R. Learn Mem Research Paper Fear conditioning is a laboratory paradigm commonly used to investigate aversive learning and memory. In context fear conditioning, a configuration of elemental cues (conditioned stimulus [CTX]) predicts an aversive event (unconditioned stimulus [US]). To quantify context fear acquisition in humans, previous work has used startle eyeblink responses (SEBRs), skin conductance responses (SCRs), and verbal reports, but different quantification methods have rarely been compared. Moreover, preclinical intervention studies mandate recall tests several days after acquisition, and it is unclear how to induce and measure context fear memory retention over such a time interval. First, we used a semi-immersive virtual reality paradigm. In two experiments (N = 23 and N = 28), we found successful declarative learning and memory retention over 7 d but no evidence of other conditioned responses. Next, we used a configural fear conditioning paradigm with five static room images as CTXs in two experiments (N = 29 and N = 24). Besides successful declarative learning and memory retention after 7 d, SCR and pupil dilation in response to CTX onset differentiated CTX(+)/CTX(−) during acquisition training, and SEBR and pupil dilation differentiated CTX(+)/CTX(−) during the recall test, with medium to large effect sizes for the most sensitive indices (SEBR: Hedge's g = 0.56 and g = 0.69; pupil dilation: Hedge's g = 0.99 and g = 0.88). Our results demonstrate that with a configural learning paradigm, context fear memory retention can be demonstrated over 7 d, and we provide robust and replicable measurement methods to this end. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2023-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10519410/ /pubmed/37553180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.053781.123 Text en © 2023 Xia et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article, published in Learning & Memory, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Xia, Yanfang Wehrli, Jelena Gerster, Samuel Kroes, Marijn Houtekamer, Maxime Bach, Dominik R. Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation |
title | Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation |
title_full | Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation |
title_fullStr | Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation |
title_short | Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation |
title_sort | measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.053781.123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiayanfang measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation AT wehrlijelena measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation AT gerstersamuel measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation AT kroesmarijn measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation AT houtekamermaxime measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation AT bachdominikr measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation |