Cargando…

Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation

Fear conditioning is a laboratory paradigm commonly used to investigate aversive learning and memory. In context fear conditioning, a configuration of elemental cues (conditioned stimulus [CTX]) predicts an aversive event (unconditioned stimulus [US]). To quantify context fear acquisition in humans,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Yanfang, Wehrli, Jelena, Gerster, Samuel, Kroes, Marijn, Houtekamer, Maxime, Bach, Dominik R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.053781.123
_version_ 1785109692146515968
author Xia, Yanfang
Wehrli, Jelena
Gerster, Samuel
Kroes, Marijn
Houtekamer, Maxime
Bach, Dominik R.
author_facet Xia, Yanfang
Wehrli, Jelena
Gerster, Samuel
Kroes, Marijn
Houtekamer, Maxime
Bach, Dominik R.
author_sort Xia, Yanfang
collection PubMed
description Fear conditioning is a laboratory paradigm commonly used to investigate aversive learning and memory. In context fear conditioning, a configuration of elemental cues (conditioned stimulus [CTX]) predicts an aversive event (unconditioned stimulus [US]). To quantify context fear acquisition in humans, previous work has used startle eyeblink responses (SEBRs), skin conductance responses (SCRs), and verbal reports, but different quantification methods have rarely been compared. Moreover, preclinical intervention studies mandate recall tests several days after acquisition, and it is unclear how to induce and measure context fear memory retention over such a time interval. First, we used a semi-immersive virtual reality paradigm. In two experiments (N = 23 and N = 28), we found successful declarative learning and memory retention over 7 d but no evidence of other conditioned responses. Next, we used a configural fear conditioning paradigm with five static room images as CTXs in two experiments (N = 29 and N = 24). Besides successful declarative learning and memory retention after 7 d, SCR and pupil dilation in response to CTX onset differentiated CTX(+)/CTX(−) during acquisition training, and SEBR and pupil dilation differentiated CTX(+)/CTX(−) during the recall test, with medium to large effect sizes for the most sensitive indices (SEBR: Hedge's g = 0.56 and g = 0.69; pupil dilation: Hedge's g = 0.99 and g = 0.88). Our results demonstrate that with a configural learning paradigm, context fear memory retention can be demonstrated over 7 d, and we provide robust and replicable measurement methods to this end.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10519410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105194102023-09-26 Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation Xia, Yanfang Wehrli, Jelena Gerster, Samuel Kroes, Marijn Houtekamer, Maxime Bach, Dominik R. Learn Mem Research Paper Fear conditioning is a laboratory paradigm commonly used to investigate aversive learning and memory. In context fear conditioning, a configuration of elemental cues (conditioned stimulus [CTX]) predicts an aversive event (unconditioned stimulus [US]). To quantify context fear acquisition in humans, previous work has used startle eyeblink responses (SEBRs), skin conductance responses (SCRs), and verbal reports, but different quantification methods have rarely been compared. Moreover, preclinical intervention studies mandate recall tests several days after acquisition, and it is unclear how to induce and measure context fear memory retention over such a time interval. First, we used a semi-immersive virtual reality paradigm. In two experiments (N = 23 and N = 28), we found successful declarative learning and memory retention over 7 d but no evidence of other conditioned responses. Next, we used a configural fear conditioning paradigm with five static room images as CTXs in two experiments (N = 29 and N = 24). Besides successful declarative learning and memory retention after 7 d, SCR and pupil dilation in response to CTX onset differentiated CTX(+)/CTX(−) during acquisition training, and SEBR and pupil dilation differentiated CTX(+)/CTX(−) during the recall test, with medium to large effect sizes for the most sensitive indices (SEBR: Hedge's g = 0.56 and g = 0.69; pupil dilation: Hedge's g = 0.99 and g = 0.88). Our results demonstrate that with a configural learning paradigm, context fear memory retention can be demonstrated over 7 d, and we provide robust and replicable measurement methods to this end. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2023-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10519410/ /pubmed/37553180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.053781.123 Text en © 2023 Xia et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article, published in Learning & Memory, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Paper
Xia, Yanfang
Wehrli, Jelena
Gerster, Samuel
Kroes, Marijn
Houtekamer, Maxime
Bach, Dominik R.
Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation
title Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation
title_full Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation
title_fullStr Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation
title_full_unstemmed Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation
title_short Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation
title_sort measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.053781.123
work_keys_str_mv AT xiayanfang measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation
AT wehrlijelena measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation
AT gerstersamuel measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation
AT kroesmarijn measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation
AT houtekamermaxime measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation
AT bachdominikr measuringhumancontextfearconditioningandretentionafterconsolidation