Socioeconomic Factors and Abortive Outcomes of Clinical Pregnancy After Embryo Transfer in the Setting of Universal Health Insurance Coverage of IVF

BACKGROUND: In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET), an expensive option for infertile couples, started to be fully covered by the National Health Insurance (NHI) from October 2017 in South Korea. We investigated the association between woman’s socioeconomic status (SES) and abortive outcomes in pregnancies after IVF-ET in the setting of universal coverage of the treatment. METHODS: Using the NHI database in South Korea, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all women who achieved clinical pregnancy after ET between October 2017 and February 2019. A total of 44,038 clinical pregnancy episodes of 29,847 women who underwent ET were analyzed. We used employment status, income in percentiles, and living in the Seoul capital area as indicators of SES. Relative risks (RRs) for abortive pregnancy outcomes were calculated for each socioeconomic stratum, using log-binomial regression models included woman’s age, body mass index, fasting blood glucose, fresh ET, month of ET, and history of smoking. RESULTS: While most pregnancy outcomes were live births (n = 30,783, 69.9%), 11,215 (25.5%) cycles ended with abortion or early pregnancy loss, 1,779 (4.0%) cycles were ectopic pregnancy, 45 (0.1%) were coded as molar pregnancy, and 224 (0.5%) were fetal death in utero or stillbirth. The risk of overall abortive outcomes was higher when a woman was unemployed (adjusted RR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.11) or living in a non-Seoul capital area (1.11; 95% CI, 1.08–1.14). The association between relative income level and abortive outcomes was close to null. Living outside Seoul capital area was associated with the greater risk of abortive outcomes especially in younger women. CONCLUSION: Unemployment and living in non-capital areas were associated with a higher risk of abortive outcomes among pregnancies after ET, even in the setting of universal coverage of IVF-ET. This suggests potential impact of socioeconomic position on the IVF-ET pregnancy.