Cargando…

The prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of Australia

Approximately 50% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) in clinical practice present with ‘low-gradient’ haemodynamics. Stroke Volume Index (SVI) is a measure of left ventricular output, with ‘normal-flow’ considered as  > 35 ml/m(2). The association between SVI and prognosis in severe low...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snir, Afik D., Ng, Martin K., Strange, Geoff, Playford, David, Stewart, Simon, Celermajer, David S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37300593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02886-y
_version_ 1785109845805891584
author Snir, Afik D.
Ng, Martin K.
Strange, Geoff
Playford, David
Stewart, Simon
Celermajer, David S.
author_facet Snir, Afik D.
Ng, Martin K.
Strange, Geoff
Playford, David
Stewart, Simon
Celermajer, David S.
author_sort Snir, Afik D.
collection PubMed
description Approximately 50% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) in clinical practice present with ‘low-gradient’ haemodynamics. Stroke Volume Index (SVI) is a measure of left ventricular output, with ‘normal-flow’ considered as  > 35 ml/m(2). The association between SVI and prognosis in severe low-gradient AS (LGAS) in currently not well-understood. We analysed the National Echo Database of Australia (NEDA) and identified 109,990 patients with sufficiently comprehensive echocardiographic data, linked to survival information. We identified 1,699 with severe LGAS and preserved ejection fraction (EF) (≥ 50%) and 774 with severe LGAS and reduced EF. One- and three-year survival in each subgroup were assessed (follow-up of 74 ± 43 months), according to SVI thresholds. In patients with preserved EF the mortality “threshold” was at SVI < 30 ml/m(2); 1- and 3-year survival was worse for those with SVI < 30 ml/m(2) relative to those with SVI > 35 ml/m(2) (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.32–2.47 and HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12–1.70), while survival was similar between those with SVI 30–35 ml/m(2) and SVI > 35 ml/m(2). In patients with reduced EF the mortality “threshold” was 35 ml/m(2); 1- and 3-year survival was worse for both those with SVI < 30 ml/m(2) and 30–35 ml/m(2) relative to those with SVI > 35 ml/m(2) (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.27–3.09 and HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05–1.93 for SVI < 30 ml/m(2) and HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.23–3.31 and HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10–2.21 for SVI 30–35 ml/m(2)). The SVI prognostic threshold for medium-term mortality in severe LGAS patients is different for those with preserved LVEF (< 30 ml/m(2)) compared to those with reduced LVEF (< 35 ml/m(2)). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-023-02886-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105201262023-09-27 The prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of Australia Snir, Afik D. Ng, Martin K. Strange, Geoff Playford, David Stewart, Simon Celermajer, David S. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Approximately 50% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) in clinical practice present with ‘low-gradient’ haemodynamics. Stroke Volume Index (SVI) is a measure of left ventricular output, with ‘normal-flow’ considered as  > 35 ml/m(2). The association between SVI and prognosis in severe low-gradient AS (LGAS) in currently not well-understood. We analysed the National Echo Database of Australia (NEDA) and identified 109,990 patients with sufficiently comprehensive echocardiographic data, linked to survival information. We identified 1,699 with severe LGAS and preserved ejection fraction (EF) (≥ 50%) and 774 with severe LGAS and reduced EF. One- and three-year survival in each subgroup were assessed (follow-up of 74 ± 43 months), according to SVI thresholds. In patients with preserved EF the mortality “threshold” was at SVI < 30 ml/m(2); 1- and 3-year survival was worse for those with SVI < 30 ml/m(2) relative to those with SVI > 35 ml/m(2) (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.32–2.47 and HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12–1.70), while survival was similar between those with SVI 30–35 ml/m(2) and SVI > 35 ml/m(2). In patients with reduced EF the mortality “threshold” was 35 ml/m(2); 1- and 3-year survival was worse for both those with SVI < 30 ml/m(2) and 30–35 ml/m(2) relative to those with SVI > 35 ml/m(2) (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.27–3.09 and HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05–1.93 for SVI < 30 ml/m(2) and HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.23–3.31 and HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10–2.21 for SVI 30–35 ml/m(2)). The SVI prognostic threshold for medium-term mortality in severe LGAS patients is different for those with preserved LVEF (< 30 ml/m(2)) compared to those with reduced LVEF (< 35 ml/m(2)). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10554-023-02886-y. Springer Netherlands 2023-06-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10520126/ /pubmed/37300593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02886-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Snir, Afik D.
Ng, Martin K.
Strange, Geoff
Playford, David
Stewart, Simon
Celermajer, David S.
The prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of Australia
title The prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of Australia
title_full The prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of Australia
title_fullStr The prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of Australia
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of Australia
title_short The prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of Australia
title_sort prognostic significance of stroke volume index in low gradient severe aortic stenosis: from the national echo database of australia
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37300593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02886-y
work_keys_str_mv AT snirafikd theprognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT ngmartink theprognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT strangegeoff theprognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT playforddavid theprognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT stewartsimon theprognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT celermajerdavids theprognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT snirafikd prognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT ngmartink prognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT strangegeoff prognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT playforddavid prognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT stewartsimon prognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia
AT celermajerdavids prognosticsignificanceofstrokevolumeindexinlowgradientsevereaorticstenosisfromthenationalechodatabaseofaustralia