Cargando…
Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Pacing indications in children are clearly defined, but whether an epicardial (EPI) or an endocardial (ENDO) pacemaker performs better remains to be elucidated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to directly compare the incidence of pacemaker (PM) lead-related complications, mortality, h...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37480376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03213-x |
_version_ | 1785109851125317632 |
---|---|
author | Patsiou, Vasiliki Haidich, Anna-Bettina Baroutidou, Amalia Giannopoulos, Andreas Giannakoulas, George |
author_facet | Patsiou, Vasiliki Haidich, Anna-Bettina Baroutidou, Amalia Giannopoulos, Andreas Giannakoulas, George |
author_sort | Patsiou, Vasiliki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pacing indications in children are clearly defined, but whether an epicardial (EPI) or an endocardial (ENDO) pacemaker performs better remains to be elucidated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to directly compare the incidence of pacemaker (PM) lead-related complications, mortality, hemothorax and venous occlusion between EPI and ENDO in children with atrioventricular block (AVB) or sinus node dysfunction (SND). Literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus by ELSEVIER, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and OpenGrey databases until June 25, 2022. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the pacing method’s effect on lead failure, threshold rise, post-implantation infection and battery depletion and secondarily on all-cause mortality, hemothorax and venous occlusion. Several sensitivity analyses were also performed. Of 22 studies initially retrieved, 18 were deemed eligible for systematic review and 15 for meta-analysis. Of 1348 pediatric patients that underwent EPI or ENDO implantation, 542 (40.2%) had a diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). EPI was significantly associated with higher possibility of PM-lead failure [pooled odds ratio (pOR) 3.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.05–4.39; I(2) = 0%]; while possibility for threshold rise, post-implantation infection and battery depletion did not differ between the PM types. Regarding the secondary outcome, the mortality rates between EPI and ENDO did not differ. In sensitivity analyses the results were consistent results between the two PM types. The findings suggest that EPI may be associated with increased PM-lead failure compared to ENDO while threshold rise, infection, battery depletion and mortality rates did not differ. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00246-023-03213-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10520152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105201522023-09-27 Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Patsiou, Vasiliki Haidich, Anna-Bettina Baroutidou, Amalia Giannopoulos, Andreas Giannakoulas, George Pediatr Cardiol Review Pacing indications in children are clearly defined, but whether an epicardial (EPI) or an endocardial (ENDO) pacemaker performs better remains to be elucidated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to directly compare the incidence of pacemaker (PM) lead-related complications, mortality, hemothorax and venous occlusion between EPI and ENDO in children with atrioventricular block (AVB) or sinus node dysfunction (SND). Literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus by ELSEVIER, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and OpenGrey databases until June 25, 2022. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the pacing method’s effect on lead failure, threshold rise, post-implantation infection and battery depletion and secondarily on all-cause mortality, hemothorax and venous occlusion. Several sensitivity analyses were also performed. Of 22 studies initially retrieved, 18 were deemed eligible for systematic review and 15 for meta-analysis. Of 1348 pediatric patients that underwent EPI or ENDO implantation, 542 (40.2%) had a diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). EPI was significantly associated with higher possibility of PM-lead failure [pooled odds ratio (pOR) 3.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.05–4.39; I(2) = 0%]; while possibility for threshold rise, post-implantation infection and battery depletion did not differ between the PM types. Regarding the secondary outcome, the mortality rates between EPI and ENDO did not differ. In sensitivity analyses the results were consistent results between the two PM types. The findings suggest that EPI may be associated with increased PM-lead failure compared to ENDO while threshold rise, infection, battery depletion and mortality rates did not differ. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00246-023-03213-x. Springer US 2023-07-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10520152/ /pubmed/37480376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03213-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Patsiou, Vasiliki Haidich, Anna-Bettina Baroutidou, Amalia Giannopoulos, Andreas Giannakoulas, George Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | epicardial versus endocardial pacing in paediatric patients with atrioventricular block or sinus node dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37480376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03213-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patsiouvasiliki epicardialversusendocardialpacinginpaediatricpatientswithatrioventricularblockorsinusnodedysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haidichannabettina epicardialversusendocardialpacinginpaediatricpatientswithatrioventricularblockorsinusnodedysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baroutidouamalia epicardialversusendocardialpacinginpaediatricpatientswithatrioventricularblockorsinusnodedysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT giannopoulosandreas epicardialversusendocardialpacinginpaediatricpatientswithatrioventricularblockorsinusnodedysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT giannakoulasgeorge epicardialversusendocardialpacinginpaediatricpatientswithatrioventricularblockorsinusnodedysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |