Cargando…

The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse?

PURPOSE: There are numerous operative procedures to treat osteoarthritic changes or a significant instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The key problem of most methods is the destabilization of the forearm leading to secondary painful impingement between the radius and ulna, as well as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sommer, Katharina, Sturm, Ramona, Sterz, Jasmina, Marzi, Ingo, Frank, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02304-x
_version_ 1785109854154653696
author Sommer, Katharina
Sturm, Ramona
Sterz, Jasmina
Marzi, Ingo
Frank, Johannes
author_facet Sommer, Katharina
Sturm, Ramona
Sterz, Jasmina
Marzi, Ingo
Frank, Johannes
author_sort Sommer, Katharina
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There are numerous operative procedures to treat osteoarthritic changes or a significant instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The key problem of most methods is the destabilization of the forearm leading to secondary painful impingement between the radius and ulna, as well as a significant limitation of forearm rotation. The Aptis-Prosthesis designed by Scheker represents a complete substitute for the DRUJ. It is mostly used after the failure of various treatment options to solve the primary problems (arthritis, instability). We have used this type of prosthesis mostly after multiple operative treatments for more than 25 years. METHODS: In the following retrospective study, we analyzed the data of patients that received an Aptis-prosthesis between 2016 and 2021. We have implanted this prosthesis in 13 cases (11 female, 2 male). Routinely, we document the clinical outcome concerning range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and pain according to numeric rate scaling (NRS) after more than 12 months (month 12–24). In addition, complications, osseous changes, and the rate of loosening of the prosthesis were registered. Furthermore, DASH-Score and patients ‘ satisfaction were evaluated. Also—as with other implants—follow-up x-rays were performed. RESULTS: Removal or significant revision of any of the prostheses was not needed. The ROM was 68.1° ± 19.7° for pronation and 72.3° ± 20.9° for supination, grip strength amounted to 27.7 kg ± 11.0 kg equaling 83% of the contralateral side. NRS was 0 at rest and 1.2 (0–2) under weight-bearing. A lysis margin of the radial tap was noted in the radiological examination in 2 patients but without any signs of loosening. The DASH-Score added up to 31.8 ± 13.8 (13–55). All patients were satisfied or very satisfied having this implant. CONCLUSION: The semiconstrained Aptis-prosthesis is a safe and efficient treatment option after failed DRUJ surgeries. It is striking that of the 20 implanted prostheses no significant revision or explantations were necessary over a period of 25 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105201652023-09-27 The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse? Sommer, Katharina Sturm, Ramona Sterz, Jasmina Marzi, Ingo Frank, Johannes Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: There are numerous operative procedures to treat osteoarthritic changes or a significant instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The key problem of most methods is the destabilization of the forearm leading to secondary painful impingement between the radius and ulna, as well as a significant limitation of forearm rotation. The Aptis-Prosthesis designed by Scheker represents a complete substitute for the DRUJ. It is mostly used after the failure of various treatment options to solve the primary problems (arthritis, instability). We have used this type of prosthesis mostly after multiple operative treatments for more than 25 years. METHODS: In the following retrospective study, we analyzed the data of patients that received an Aptis-prosthesis between 2016 and 2021. We have implanted this prosthesis in 13 cases (11 female, 2 male). Routinely, we document the clinical outcome concerning range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and pain according to numeric rate scaling (NRS) after more than 12 months (month 12–24). In addition, complications, osseous changes, and the rate of loosening of the prosthesis were registered. Furthermore, DASH-Score and patients ‘ satisfaction were evaluated. Also—as with other implants—follow-up x-rays were performed. RESULTS: Removal or significant revision of any of the prostheses was not needed. The ROM was 68.1° ± 19.7° for pronation and 72.3° ± 20.9° for supination, grip strength amounted to 27.7 kg ± 11.0 kg equaling 83% of the contralateral side. NRS was 0 at rest and 1.2 (0–2) under weight-bearing. A lysis margin of the radial tap was noted in the radiological examination in 2 patients but without any signs of loosening. The DASH-Score added up to 31.8 ± 13.8 (13–55). All patients were satisfied or very satisfied having this implant. CONCLUSION: The semiconstrained Aptis-prosthesis is a safe and efficient treatment option after failed DRUJ surgeries. It is striking that of the 20 implanted prostheses no significant revision or explantations were necessary over a period of 25 years. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10520165/ /pubmed/37493761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02304-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Sommer, Katharina
Sturm, Ramona
Sterz, Jasmina
Marzi, Ingo
Frank, Johannes
The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse?
title The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse?
title_full The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse?
title_fullStr The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse?
title_full_unstemmed The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse?
title_short The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse?
title_sort semiconstrained druj prosthesis: blessing or curse?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02304-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sommerkatharina thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse
AT sturmramona thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse
AT sterzjasmina thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse
AT marziingo thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse
AT frankjohannes thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse
AT sommerkatharina semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse
AT sturmramona semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse
AT sterzjasmina semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse
AT marziingo semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse
AT frankjohannes semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse