Cargando…
The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse?
PURPOSE: There are numerous operative procedures to treat osteoarthritic changes or a significant instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The key problem of most methods is the destabilization of the forearm leading to secondary painful impingement between the radius and ulna, as well as...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02304-x |
_version_ | 1785109854154653696 |
---|---|
author | Sommer, Katharina Sturm, Ramona Sterz, Jasmina Marzi, Ingo Frank, Johannes |
author_facet | Sommer, Katharina Sturm, Ramona Sterz, Jasmina Marzi, Ingo Frank, Johannes |
author_sort | Sommer, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There are numerous operative procedures to treat osteoarthritic changes or a significant instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The key problem of most methods is the destabilization of the forearm leading to secondary painful impingement between the radius and ulna, as well as a significant limitation of forearm rotation. The Aptis-Prosthesis designed by Scheker represents a complete substitute for the DRUJ. It is mostly used after the failure of various treatment options to solve the primary problems (arthritis, instability). We have used this type of prosthesis mostly after multiple operative treatments for more than 25 years. METHODS: In the following retrospective study, we analyzed the data of patients that received an Aptis-prosthesis between 2016 and 2021. We have implanted this prosthesis in 13 cases (11 female, 2 male). Routinely, we document the clinical outcome concerning range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and pain according to numeric rate scaling (NRS) after more than 12 months (month 12–24). In addition, complications, osseous changes, and the rate of loosening of the prosthesis were registered. Furthermore, DASH-Score and patients ‘ satisfaction were evaluated. Also—as with other implants—follow-up x-rays were performed. RESULTS: Removal or significant revision of any of the prostheses was not needed. The ROM was 68.1° ± 19.7° for pronation and 72.3° ± 20.9° for supination, grip strength amounted to 27.7 kg ± 11.0 kg equaling 83% of the contralateral side. NRS was 0 at rest and 1.2 (0–2) under weight-bearing. A lysis margin of the radial tap was noted in the radiological examination in 2 patients but without any signs of loosening. The DASH-Score added up to 31.8 ± 13.8 (13–55). All patients were satisfied or very satisfied having this implant. CONCLUSION: The semiconstrained Aptis-prosthesis is a safe and efficient treatment option after failed DRUJ surgeries. It is striking that of the 20 implanted prostheses no significant revision or explantations were necessary over a period of 25 years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10520165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105201652023-09-27 The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse? Sommer, Katharina Sturm, Ramona Sterz, Jasmina Marzi, Ingo Frank, Johannes Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: There are numerous operative procedures to treat osteoarthritic changes or a significant instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The key problem of most methods is the destabilization of the forearm leading to secondary painful impingement between the radius and ulna, as well as a significant limitation of forearm rotation. The Aptis-Prosthesis designed by Scheker represents a complete substitute for the DRUJ. It is mostly used after the failure of various treatment options to solve the primary problems (arthritis, instability). We have used this type of prosthesis mostly after multiple operative treatments for more than 25 years. METHODS: In the following retrospective study, we analyzed the data of patients that received an Aptis-prosthesis between 2016 and 2021. We have implanted this prosthesis in 13 cases (11 female, 2 male). Routinely, we document the clinical outcome concerning range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and pain according to numeric rate scaling (NRS) after more than 12 months (month 12–24). In addition, complications, osseous changes, and the rate of loosening of the prosthesis were registered. Furthermore, DASH-Score and patients ‘ satisfaction were evaluated. Also—as with other implants—follow-up x-rays were performed. RESULTS: Removal or significant revision of any of the prostheses was not needed. The ROM was 68.1° ± 19.7° for pronation and 72.3° ± 20.9° for supination, grip strength amounted to 27.7 kg ± 11.0 kg equaling 83% of the contralateral side. NRS was 0 at rest and 1.2 (0–2) under weight-bearing. A lysis margin of the radial tap was noted in the radiological examination in 2 patients but without any signs of loosening. The DASH-Score added up to 31.8 ± 13.8 (13–55). All patients were satisfied or very satisfied having this implant. CONCLUSION: The semiconstrained Aptis-prosthesis is a safe and efficient treatment option after failed DRUJ surgeries. It is striking that of the 20 implanted prostheses no significant revision or explantations were necessary over a period of 25 years. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10520165/ /pubmed/37493761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02304-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sommer, Katharina Sturm, Ramona Sterz, Jasmina Marzi, Ingo Frank, Johannes The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse? |
title | The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse? |
title_full | The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse? |
title_fullStr | The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse? |
title_full_unstemmed | The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse? |
title_short | The semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis: blessing or curse? |
title_sort | semiconstrained druj prosthesis: blessing or curse? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02304-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sommerkatharina thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse AT sturmramona thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse AT sterzjasmina thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse AT marziingo thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse AT frankjohannes thesemiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse AT sommerkatharina semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse AT sturmramona semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse AT sterzjasmina semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse AT marziingo semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse AT frankjohannes semiconstraineddrujprosthesisblessingorcurse |