Cargando…

Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable orthosis versus a cast regarding safety and functional outcome in the NOM of stable type B ankle fractures. METHODS: A systemat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spierings, Jelle Friso, Nijdam, Thomas Marcus Paulus, van der Heijden, Lizz, Schuijt, Henk Jan, Kokke, Marike Cornelia, van der Velde, Detlef, Smeeing, Diederik Pieter Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02169-6
_version_ 1785109854387437568
author Spierings, Jelle Friso
Nijdam, Thomas Marcus Paulus
van der Heijden, Lizz
Schuijt, Henk Jan
Kokke, Marike Cornelia
van der Velde, Detlef
Smeeing, Diederik Pieter Johan
author_facet Spierings, Jelle Friso
Nijdam, Thomas Marcus Paulus
van der Heijden, Lizz
Schuijt, Henk Jan
Kokke, Marike Cornelia
van der Velde, Detlef
Smeeing, Diederik Pieter Johan
author_sort Spierings, Jelle Friso
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable orthosis versus a cast regarding safety and functional outcome in the NOM of stable type B ankle fractures. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. Nonoperative management was compared using the number of complications and functional outcome measured using the Olerud and Molander Score (OMAS) or the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Ankle Score. RESULTS: Five studies were included. Two were randomized clinical trials, and three were observational studies, including a total of 516 patients. A meta-analysis showed statistically significant higher odds of developing complications in the cast group [odds ratio (OR), 4.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52–14.35)]. Functional outcome in OMAS did not vary significantly at 6 weeks, mean difference (MD) − 6.64 (95% CI − 13.72 to + 0.45), and at 12 weeks, MD − 6.91 (95% CI − 18.73 to + 4.91). The mean difference of functional outcome in OMAS at 26 weeks or longer was significantly better in the removable orthosis group; MD − 2.63 (95% CI − 5.01 to − 0.25). CONCLUSION: Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that a removable orthosis is a safe alternative type of NOM, as complication numbers are significantly lower in the orthosis group. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in terms of functional outcome between a removable orthosis and a cast at 6 and 12 weeks. The 6-week and the 26-week OMAS results show that in patients with stable type B ankle fractures, a removable orthosis is non-inferior to a cast in terms of functional outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105201662023-09-27 Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis Spierings, Jelle Friso Nijdam, Thomas Marcus Paulus van der Heijden, Lizz Schuijt, Henk Jan Kokke, Marike Cornelia van der Velde, Detlef Smeeing, Diederik Pieter Johan Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable orthosis versus a cast regarding safety and functional outcome in the NOM of stable type B ankle fractures. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. Nonoperative management was compared using the number of complications and functional outcome measured using the Olerud and Molander Score (OMAS) or the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Ankle Score. RESULTS: Five studies were included. Two were randomized clinical trials, and three were observational studies, including a total of 516 patients. A meta-analysis showed statistically significant higher odds of developing complications in the cast group [odds ratio (OR), 4.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52–14.35)]. Functional outcome in OMAS did not vary significantly at 6 weeks, mean difference (MD) − 6.64 (95% CI − 13.72 to + 0.45), and at 12 weeks, MD − 6.91 (95% CI − 18.73 to + 4.91). The mean difference of functional outcome in OMAS at 26 weeks or longer was significantly better in the removable orthosis group; MD − 2.63 (95% CI − 5.01 to − 0.25). CONCLUSION: Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that a removable orthosis is a safe alternative type of NOM, as complication numbers are significantly lower in the orthosis group. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in terms of functional outcome between a removable orthosis and a cast at 6 and 12 weeks. The 6-week and the 26-week OMAS results show that in patients with stable type B ankle fractures, a removable orthosis is non-inferior to a cast in terms of functional outcome. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10520166/ /pubmed/36383226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02169-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Spierings, Jelle Friso
Nijdam, Thomas Marcus Paulus
van der Heijden, Lizz
Schuijt, Henk Jan
Kokke, Marike Cornelia
van der Velde, Detlef
Smeeing, Diederik Pieter Johan
Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type b ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02169-6
work_keys_str_mv AT spieringsjellefriso castversusremovableorthosisforthemanagementofstabletypebanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nijdamthomasmarcuspaulus castversusremovableorthosisforthemanagementofstabletypebanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanderheijdenlizz castversusremovableorthosisforthemanagementofstabletypebanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schuijthenkjan castversusremovableorthosisforthemanagementofstabletypebanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kokkemarikecornelia castversusremovableorthosisforthemanagementofstabletypebanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanderveldedetlef castversusremovableorthosisforthemanagementofstabletypebanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smeeingdiederikpieterjohan castversusremovableorthosisforthemanagementofstabletypebanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis