Cargando…

Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Technical skill assessment in surgery relies on expert opinion. Therefore, it is time-consuming, costly, and often lacks objectivity. Analysis of intraoperative data by artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential for automated technical skill assessment. The aim of this systematic rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedrett, Romina, Mascagni, Pietro, Beldi, Guido, Padoy, Nicolas, Lavanchy, Joël L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37584774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10335-z
_version_ 1785109856534921216
author Pedrett, Romina
Mascagni, Pietro
Beldi, Guido
Padoy, Nicolas
Lavanchy, Joël L.
author_facet Pedrett, Romina
Mascagni, Pietro
Beldi, Guido
Padoy, Nicolas
Lavanchy, Joël L.
author_sort Pedrett, Romina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technical skill assessment in surgery relies on expert opinion. Therefore, it is time-consuming, costly, and often lacks objectivity. Analysis of intraoperative data by artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential for automated technical skill assessment. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the performance, external validity, and generalizability of AI models for technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore was performed to identify original articles reporting the use of AI in the assessment of technical skill in minimally invasive surgery. Risk of bias (RoB) and quality of the included studies were analyzed according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria and the modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklists, respectively. Findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS: In total, 1958 articles were identified, 50 articles met eligibility criteria and were analyzed. Motion data extracted from surgical videos (n = 25) or kinematic data from robotic systems or sensors (n = 22) were the most frequent input data for AI. Most studies used deep learning (n = 34) and predicted technical skills using an ordinal assessment scale (n = 36) with good accuracies in simulated settings. However, all proposed models were in development stage, only 4 studies were externally validated and 8 showed a low RoB. CONCLUSION: AI showed good performance in technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery. However, models often lacked external validity and generalizability. Therefore, models should be benchmarked using predefined performance metrics and tested in clinical implementation studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10335-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105201752023-09-27 Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review Pedrett, Romina Mascagni, Pietro Beldi, Guido Padoy, Nicolas Lavanchy, Joël L. Surg Endosc Review Article BACKGROUND: Technical skill assessment in surgery relies on expert opinion. Therefore, it is time-consuming, costly, and often lacks objectivity. Analysis of intraoperative data by artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential for automated technical skill assessment. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the performance, external validity, and generalizability of AI models for technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore was performed to identify original articles reporting the use of AI in the assessment of technical skill in minimally invasive surgery. Risk of bias (RoB) and quality of the included studies were analyzed according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria and the modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklists, respectively. Findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS: In total, 1958 articles were identified, 50 articles met eligibility criteria and were analyzed. Motion data extracted from surgical videos (n = 25) or kinematic data from robotic systems or sensors (n = 22) were the most frequent input data for AI. Most studies used deep learning (n = 34) and predicted technical skills using an ordinal assessment scale (n = 36) with good accuracies in simulated settings. However, all proposed models were in development stage, only 4 studies were externally validated and 8 showed a low RoB. CONCLUSION: AI showed good performance in technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery. However, models often lacked external validity and generalizability. Therefore, models should be benchmarked using predefined performance metrics and tested in clinical implementation studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10335-z. Springer US 2023-08-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10520175/ /pubmed/37584774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10335-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Pedrett, Romina
Mascagni, Pietro
Beldi, Guido
Padoy, Nicolas
Lavanchy, Joël L.
Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review
title Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review
title_full Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review
title_fullStr Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review
title_short Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review
title_sort technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37584774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10335-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrettromina technicalskillassessmentinminimallyinvasivesurgeryusingartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT mascagnipietro technicalskillassessmentinminimallyinvasivesurgeryusingartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT beldiguido technicalskillassessmentinminimallyinvasivesurgeryusingartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT padoynicolas technicalskillassessmentinminimallyinvasivesurgeryusingartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT lavanchyjoell technicalskillassessmentinminimallyinvasivesurgeryusingartificialintelligenceasystematicreview