Cargando…

Zur evaluierenden Audiometrie nach Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung

BACKGROUND: One of the main treatment goals in cochlear implant (CI) patients is to improve speech perception. One of the target parameters is speech intelligibility in quiet. However, treatment results show a high variability, which has not been sufficiently explained so far. The aim of this nonint...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dziemba, Oliver C., Merz, Stephan, Hocke, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-023-01316-8
_version_ 1785109865118564352
author Dziemba, Oliver C.
Merz, Stephan
Hocke, Thomas
author_facet Dziemba, Oliver C.
Merz, Stephan
Hocke, Thomas
author_sort Dziemba, Oliver C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the main treatment goals in cochlear implant (CI) patients is to improve speech perception. One of the target parameters is speech intelligibility in quiet. However, treatment results show a high variability, which has not been sufficiently explained so far. The aim of this noninterventional retrospective study was to elucidate this variability using a selected population of patients in whom etiology was not expected to have a negative impact on postoperative speech intelligibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Audiometric findings of the CI follow-up of 28 adult patients after 6 months of CI experience were evaluated. These were related to the preoperative audiometric examination and evaluated with respect to a recently published predictive model for the postoperative monosyllabic score. RESULTS: Inclusion of postoperative categorical loudness scaling and hearing loss for Freiburg numbers in the model explained 55% of the variability in fitting outcomes with respect to monosyllabic comprehension. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that much of the cause of variability in fitting outcomes can be captured by systematic postoperative audiometric checks. Immediate conclusions for CI system adjustments may be drawn from these results. However, the extent to which these are accepted by individual patients and thus lead to an improvement in outcome must be subject to further study, preferably prospective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105202092023-09-27 Zur evaluierenden Audiometrie nach Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung Dziemba, Oliver C. Merz, Stephan Hocke, Thomas HNO Originalien BACKGROUND: One of the main treatment goals in cochlear implant (CI) patients is to improve speech perception. One of the target parameters is speech intelligibility in quiet. However, treatment results show a high variability, which has not been sufficiently explained so far. The aim of this noninterventional retrospective study was to elucidate this variability using a selected population of patients in whom etiology was not expected to have a negative impact on postoperative speech intelligibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Audiometric findings of the CI follow-up of 28 adult patients after 6 months of CI experience were evaluated. These were related to the preoperative audiometric examination and evaluated with respect to a recently published predictive model for the postoperative monosyllabic score. RESULTS: Inclusion of postoperative categorical loudness scaling and hearing loss for Freiburg numbers in the model explained 55% of the variability in fitting outcomes with respect to monosyllabic comprehension. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that much of the cause of variability in fitting outcomes can be captured by systematic postoperative audiometric checks. Immediate conclusions for CI system adjustments may be drawn from these results. However, the extent to which these are accepted by individual patients and thus lead to an improvement in outcome must be subject to further study, preferably prospective. Springer Medizin 2023-07-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10520209/ /pubmed/37450021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-023-01316-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Dziemba, Oliver C.
Merz, Stephan
Hocke, Thomas
Zur evaluierenden Audiometrie nach Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung
title Zur evaluierenden Audiometrie nach Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung
title_full Zur evaluierenden Audiometrie nach Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung
title_fullStr Zur evaluierenden Audiometrie nach Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung
title_full_unstemmed Zur evaluierenden Audiometrie nach Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung
title_short Zur evaluierenden Audiometrie nach Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung
title_sort zur evaluierenden audiometrie nach cochlea-implantat-versorgung
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37450021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-023-01316-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dziembaoliverc zurevaluierendenaudiometrienachcochleaimplantatversorgung
AT merzstephan zurevaluierendenaudiometrienachcochleaimplantatversorgung
AT hockethomas zurevaluierendenaudiometrienachcochleaimplantatversorgung