Cargando…
Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya: why these matter, and how they may change over time
Background: This study sought to understand private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya’s health information system (KHIS). We approached this through three lenses: governance, procedural and technical. Our study looked at these areas of interest in Kenya, complemented by deeper exploration...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766755 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13909.2 |
_version_ | 1785109874495979520 |
---|---|
author | Appleford, Gabrielle Mumbia, Daniel Emmart, Priya |
author_facet | Appleford, Gabrielle Mumbia, Daniel Emmart, Priya |
author_sort | Appleford, Gabrielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: This study sought to understand private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya’s health information system (KHIS). We approached this through three lenses: governance, procedural and technical. Our study looked at these areas of interest in Kenya, complemented by deeper exploration in Nairobi County. Methods: The study used mixed methods drawing on analysis from the KHIS and surveys, complemented by desk review. The qualitative research entailed group discussions with public sector personnel while more in-depth qualitative interviews were done with public and private sector respondents. A framework matrix was developed for the qualitative analysis. The study was approved by the Ministry of Health in March 2022 and conducted over the period March - May 2022. Results: From a governance lens, private sector respondents recognised the importance of registry and reporting as a government policy requirement. From a procedural lens, private sector respondents saw reporting procedures as duplicative and parallel processes as reports are not generated through digitised information systems. From a technical lens, private sector reporting rates have improved over time however other data quality issues remain, which include over- and under-reporting of family planning services into KHIS. Secondary analysis for Nairobi County shows that the private facility contribution to family planning has declined over time while family planning access through pharmacies have grown over the same period; there is no visibility on this shift within the KHIS. Changes in private sector family service provision have implications for assumptions underpinning modern contraceptive modelled estimates and programmatic decision-making. Conclusions: There is limited monitoring of the incentives and disincentives for reporting by private health facilities into the KHIS. These have changed over time and place. Sustained private sector engagement is important to align incentives for reporting as is greater visibility on the role of pharmacies in family planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10520241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105202412023-09-27 Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya: why these matter, and how they may change over time Appleford, Gabrielle Mumbia, Daniel Emmart, Priya Gates Open Res Research Article Background: This study sought to understand private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya’s health information system (KHIS). We approached this through three lenses: governance, procedural and technical. Our study looked at these areas of interest in Kenya, complemented by deeper exploration in Nairobi County. Methods: The study used mixed methods drawing on analysis from the KHIS and surveys, complemented by desk review. The qualitative research entailed group discussions with public sector personnel while more in-depth qualitative interviews were done with public and private sector respondents. A framework matrix was developed for the qualitative analysis. The study was approved by the Ministry of Health in March 2022 and conducted over the period March - May 2022. Results: From a governance lens, private sector respondents recognised the importance of registry and reporting as a government policy requirement. From a procedural lens, private sector respondents saw reporting procedures as duplicative and parallel processes as reports are not generated through digitised information systems. From a technical lens, private sector reporting rates have improved over time however other data quality issues remain, which include over- and under-reporting of family planning services into KHIS. Secondary analysis for Nairobi County shows that the private facility contribution to family planning has declined over time while family planning access through pharmacies have grown over the same period; there is no visibility on this shift within the KHIS. Changes in private sector family service provision have implications for assumptions underpinning modern contraceptive modelled estimates and programmatic decision-making. Conclusions: There is limited monitoring of the incentives and disincentives for reporting by private health facilities into the KHIS. These have changed over time and place. Sustained private sector engagement is important to align incentives for reporting as is greater visibility on the role of pharmacies in family planning. F1000 Research Limited 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10520241/ /pubmed/37766755 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13909.2 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Appleford G et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Appleford, Gabrielle Mumbia, Daniel Emmart, Priya Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya: why these matter, and how they may change over time |
title | Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya:
why these matter, and how they may change over time
|
title_full | Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya:
why these matter, and how they may change over time
|
title_fullStr | Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya:
why these matter, and how they may change over time
|
title_full_unstemmed | Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya:
why these matter, and how they may change over time
|
title_short | Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya:
why these matter, and how they may change over time
|
title_sort | incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in kenya:
why these matter, and how they may change over time |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766755 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13909.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT applefordgabrielle incentivesanddisincentivestoprivatesectorreportingonfamilyplanninginkenyawhythesematterandhowtheymaychangeovertime AT mumbiadaniel incentivesanddisincentivestoprivatesectorreportingonfamilyplanninginkenyawhythesematterandhowtheymaychangeovertime AT emmartpriya incentivesanddisincentivestoprivatesectorreportingonfamilyplanninginkenyawhythesematterandhowtheymaychangeovertime |