Cargando…

Efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Technology-based interventions (TBIs) are a useful approach when attempting to provide therapy to more patients with psychosis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of outcomes of TBIs v. face-to-face interventions in psychosis were identified in a systematic search conducted in PubMed/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales-Pillado, Carla, Fernández-Castilla, Belén, Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Teresa, González-Fraile, Eduardo, Barbeito, Sara, Calvo, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722003610
_version_ 1785109957760253952
author Morales-Pillado, Carla
Fernández-Castilla, Belén
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Teresa
González-Fraile, Eduardo
Barbeito, Sara
Calvo, Ana
author_facet Morales-Pillado, Carla
Fernández-Castilla, Belén
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Teresa
González-Fraile, Eduardo
Barbeito, Sara
Calvo, Ana
author_sort Morales-Pillado, Carla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technology-based interventions (TBIs) are a useful approach when attempting to provide therapy to more patients with psychosis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of outcomes of TBIs v. face-to-face interventions in psychosis were identified in a systematic search conducted in PubMed/Ovid MEDLINE. Data were extracted independently by two researchers, and standardized mean changes were pooled using a three-level model and network meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies were included. TBIs complementing treatment as usual (TAU) were generally superior to face-to-face interventions (g = 0.16, p ≤ 0.0001) and to specific outcomes, namely, neurocognition (g = 0.13, p ≤ 0.0001), functioning (g = 0.25, p = 0.006), and social cognition (g = 0.32, p ≤ 0.05). Based on the network meta-analysis, the effect of two TBIs differed significantly from zero; these were the TBIs cognitive training for the neurocognitive outcome [g = 0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09–0.23] and cognitive behavioral therapy for quality of life (g = 1.27; 95% CI 0.46–2.08). The variables educational level, type of medication, frequency of the intervention, and contact during the intervention moderated the effectiveness of TBIs over face-to-face interventions in neurocognition and symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: TBIs are effective for the management of neurocognition, symptomatology, functioning, social cognition, and quality of life outcomes in patients with psychosis. The results of the network meta-analysis showed the efficacy of some TBIs for neurocognition, symptomatology, and quality of life. Therefore, TBIs should be considered a complement to TAU in patients with psychosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105206072023-09-27 Efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Morales-Pillado, Carla Fernández-Castilla, Belén Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Teresa González-Fraile, Eduardo Barbeito, Sara Calvo, Ana Psychol Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Technology-based interventions (TBIs) are a useful approach when attempting to provide therapy to more patients with psychosis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of outcomes of TBIs v. face-to-face interventions in psychosis were identified in a systematic search conducted in PubMed/Ovid MEDLINE. Data were extracted independently by two researchers, and standardized mean changes were pooled using a three-level model and network meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies were included. TBIs complementing treatment as usual (TAU) were generally superior to face-to-face interventions (g = 0.16, p ≤ 0.0001) and to specific outcomes, namely, neurocognition (g = 0.13, p ≤ 0.0001), functioning (g = 0.25, p = 0.006), and social cognition (g = 0.32, p ≤ 0.05). Based on the network meta-analysis, the effect of two TBIs differed significantly from zero; these were the TBIs cognitive training for the neurocognitive outcome [g = 0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09–0.23] and cognitive behavioral therapy for quality of life (g = 1.27; 95% CI 0.46–2.08). The variables educational level, type of medication, frequency of the intervention, and contact during the intervention moderated the effectiveness of TBIs over face-to-face interventions in neurocognition and symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: TBIs are effective for the management of neurocognition, symptomatology, functioning, social cognition, and quality of life outcomes in patients with psychosis. The results of the network meta-analysis showed the efficacy of some TBIs for neurocognition, symptomatology, and quality of life. Therefore, TBIs should be considered a complement to TAU in patients with psychosis. Cambridge University Press 2023-10 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10520607/ /pubmed/36472150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722003610 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Morales-Pillado, Carla
Fernández-Castilla, Belén
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Teresa
González-Fraile, Eduardo
Barbeito, Sara
Calvo, Ana
Efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722003610
work_keys_str_mv AT moralespilladocarla efficacyoftechnologybasedinterventionsinpsychosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT fernandezcastillabelen efficacyoftechnologybasedinterventionsinpsychosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sanchezgutierrezteresa efficacyoftechnologybasedinterventionsinpsychosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT gonzalezfraileeduardo efficacyoftechnologybasedinterventionsinpsychosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT barbeitosara efficacyoftechnologybasedinterventionsinpsychosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT calvoana efficacyoftechnologybasedinterventionsinpsychosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis