Cargando…
Methodological quality of Campbell Systematic Reviews has improved over the past decade
Autores principales: | Li, Yanfei, Dewidar, Omar, Wang, Xiaoqin, Ghogomu, Elizabeth, Wadhwani, Arpana, Guo, Ke, Ma, Mina, Barbeau, Victoria, Pan, Bei, Abdelrazeq, Leenah, Li, Zijun, Alghamyan, Amjad, Guo, Liping, Jahel, Fatima, Ren, Junjie, Madani, Mohamad Tarek, Allam, Sarah, Hussain, Tarannum, Yang, Minyan, Kojan, Waleed, Li, Xiuxia, Yang, Kehu, Welch, Vivian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37767362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1358 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review
por: Wang, Xiaoqin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
PROTOCOL: The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: a methodological systematic review
por: Wang, Xiaoqin, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Research priority setting related to older adults: a scoping review to inform the Cochrane-Campbell Global Ageing Partnership work programme
por: Barbeau, Victoria I, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
PROTOCOL: Adult skills development and training in high‐income countries: A Campbell evidence and gap map
por: Welch, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study
por: Petkovic, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2018)