Cargando…

Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models

BACKGROUND: The volumetric size of a brain lesion is a frequently used stroke biomarker. It stands out among most imaging biomarkers for being a one-dimensional variable that is applicable in simple statistical models. In times of machine learning algorithms, the question arises of whether such a si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sperber, Christoph, Gallucci, Laura, Mirman, Daniel, Arnold, Marcel, Umarova, Roza M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103511
_version_ 1785109972345946112
author Sperber, Christoph
Gallucci, Laura
Mirman, Daniel
Arnold, Marcel
Umarova, Roza M.
author_facet Sperber, Christoph
Gallucci, Laura
Mirman, Daniel
Arnold, Marcel
Umarova, Roza M.
author_sort Sperber, Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The volumetric size of a brain lesion is a frequently used stroke biomarker. It stands out among most imaging biomarkers for being a one-dimensional variable that is applicable in simple statistical models. In times of machine learning algorithms, the question arises of whether such a simple variable is still useful, or whether high-dimensional models on spatial lesion information are superior. METHODS: We included 753 first-ever anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients (age 68.4±15.2 years; NIHSS at 24 h 4.4±5.1; modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3-months median[IQR] 1[0.75;3]) and traced lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. In an out-of-sample model validation scheme, we predicted stroke severity as measured by NIHSS 24 h and functional stroke outcome as measured by mRS at 3 months either from spatial lesion features or lesion size. RESULTS: For stroke severity, the best regression model based on lesion size performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with R(2) = 0.322, but models with spatial lesion features performed significantly better with R(2) = 0.363 (t(7 5 2) = 2.889; p = 0.004). For stroke outcome, the best classification model based on lesion size again performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with an accuracy of 62.8%, which was not different from the best model with spatial lesion features (62.6%, p = 0.80). With smaller training data sets of only 150 or 50 patients, the performance of high-dimensional models with spatial lesion features decreased up to the point of being equivalent or even inferior to models trained on lesion size. The combination of lesion size and spatial lesion features in one model did not improve predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion size is a decent biomarker for stroke outcome and severity that is slightly inferior to spatial lesion features but is particularly suited in studies with small samples. When low-dimensional models are desired, lesion size provides a viable proxy biomarker for spatial lesion features, whereas high-precision prediction models in personalised prognostic medicine should operate with high-dimensional spatial imaging features in large samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105206722023-09-27 Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models Sperber, Christoph Gallucci, Laura Mirman, Daniel Arnold, Marcel Umarova, Roza M. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article BACKGROUND: The volumetric size of a brain lesion is a frequently used stroke biomarker. It stands out among most imaging biomarkers for being a one-dimensional variable that is applicable in simple statistical models. In times of machine learning algorithms, the question arises of whether such a simple variable is still useful, or whether high-dimensional models on spatial lesion information are superior. METHODS: We included 753 first-ever anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients (age 68.4±15.2 years; NIHSS at 24 h 4.4±5.1; modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3-months median[IQR] 1[0.75;3]) and traced lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. In an out-of-sample model validation scheme, we predicted stroke severity as measured by NIHSS 24 h and functional stroke outcome as measured by mRS at 3 months either from spatial lesion features or lesion size. RESULTS: For stroke severity, the best regression model based on lesion size performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with R(2) = 0.322, but models with spatial lesion features performed significantly better with R(2) = 0.363 (t(7 5 2) = 2.889; p = 0.004). For stroke outcome, the best classification model based on lesion size again performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with an accuracy of 62.8%, which was not different from the best model with spatial lesion features (62.6%, p = 0.80). With smaller training data sets of only 150 or 50 patients, the performance of high-dimensional models with spatial lesion features decreased up to the point of being equivalent or even inferior to models trained on lesion size. The combination of lesion size and spatial lesion features in one model did not improve predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion size is a decent biomarker for stroke outcome and severity that is slightly inferior to spatial lesion features but is particularly suited in studies with small samples. When low-dimensional models are desired, lesion size provides a viable proxy biomarker for spatial lesion features, whereas high-precision prediction models in personalised prognostic medicine should operate with high-dimensional spatial imaging features in large samples. Elsevier 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10520672/ /pubmed/37741168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103511 Text en Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Sperber, Christoph
Gallucci, Laura
Mirman, Daniel
Arnold, Marcel
Umarova, Roza M.
Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models
title Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models
title_full Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models
title_fullStr Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models
title_full_unstemmed Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models
title_short Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models
title_sort stroke lesion size – still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103511
work_keys_str_mv AT sperberchristoph strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels
AT galluccilaura strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels
AT mirmandaniel strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels
AT arnoldmarcel strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels
AT umarovarozam strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels