Cargando…
Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models
BACKGROUND: The volumetric size of a brain lesion is a frequently used stroke biomarker. It stands out among most imaging biomarkers for being a one-dimensional variable that is applicable in simple statistical models. In times of machine learning algorithms, the question arises of whether such a si...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103511 |
_version_ | 1785109972345946112 |
---|---|
author | Sperber, Christoph Gallucci, Laura Mirman, Daniel Arnold, Marcel Umarova, Roza M. |
author_facet | Sperber, Christoph Gallucci, Laura Mirman, Daniel Arnold, Marcel Umarova, Roza M. |
author_sort | Sperber, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The volumetric size of a brain lesion is a frequently used stroke biomarker. It stands out among most imaging biomarkers for being a one-dimensional variable that is applicable in simple statistical models. In times of machine learning algorithms, the question arises of whether such a simple variable is still useful, or whether high-dimensional models on spatial lesion information are superior. METHODS: We included 753 first-ever anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients (age 68.4±15.2 years; NIHSS at 24 h 4.4±5.1; modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3-months median[IQR] 1[0.75;3]) and traced lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. In an out-of-sample model validation scheme, we predicted stroke severity as measured by NIHSS 24 h and functional stroke outcome as measured by mRS at 3 months either from spatial lesion features or lesion size. RESULTS: For stroke severity, the best regression model based on lesion size performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with R(2) = 0.322, but models with spatial lesion features performed significantly better with R(2) = 0.363 (t(7 5 2) = 2.889; p = 0.004). For stroke outcome, the best classification model based on lesion size again performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with an accuracy of 62.8%, which was not different from the best model with spatial lesion features (62.6%, p = 0.80). With smaller training data sets of only 150 or 50 patients, the performance of high-dimensional models with spatial lesion features decreased up to the point of being equivalent or even inferior to models trained on lesion size. The combination of lesion size and spatial lesion features in one model did not improve predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion size is a decent biomarker for stroke outcome and severity that is slightly inferior to spatial lesion features but is particularly suited in studies with small samples. When low-dimensional models are desired, lesion size provides a viable proxy biomarker for spatial lesion features, whereas high-precision prediction models in personalised prognostic medicine should operate with high-dimensional spatial imaging features in large samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10520672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105206722023-09-27 Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models Sperber, Christoph Gallucci, Laura Mirman, Daniel Arnold, Marcel Umarova, Roza M. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article BACKGROUND: The volumetric size of a brain lesion is a frequently used stroke biomarker. It stands out among most imaging biomarkers for being a one-dimensional variable that is applicable in simple statistical models. In times of machine learning algorithms, the question arises of whether such a simple variable is still useful, or whether high-dimensional models on spatial lesion information are superior. METHODS: We included 753 first-ever anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients (age 68.4±15.2 years; NIHSS at 24 h 4.4±5.1; modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3-months median[IQR] 1[0.75;3]) and traced lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. In an out-of-sample model validation scheme, we predicted stroke severity as measured by NIHSS 24 h and functional stroke outcome as measured by mRS at 3 months either from spatial lesion features or lesion size. RESULTS: For stroke severity, the best regression model based on lesion size performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with R(2) = 0.322, but models with spatial lesion features performed significantly better with R(2) = 0.363 (t(7 5 2) = 2.889; p = 0.004). For stroke outcome, the best classification model based on lesion size again performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with an accuracy of 62.8%, which was not different from the best model with spatial lesion features (62.6%, p = 0.80). With smaller training data sets of only 150 or 50 patients, the performance of high-dimensional models with spatial lesion features decreased up to the point of being equivalent or even inferior to models trained on lesion size. The combination of lesion size and spatial lesion features in one model did not improve predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion size is a decent biomarker for stroke outcome and severity that is slightly inferior to spatial lesion features but is particularly suited in studies with small samples. When low-dimensional models are desired, lesion size provides a viable proxy biomarker for spatial lesion features, whereas high-precision prediction models in personalised prognostic medicine should operate with high-dimensional spatial imaging features in large samples. Elsevier 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10520672/ /pubmed/37741168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103511 Text en Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Sperber, Christoph Gallucci, Laura Mirman, Daniel Arnold, Marcel Umarova, Roza M. Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models |
title | Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models |
title_full | Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models |
title_fullStr | Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models |
title_full_unstemmed | Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models |
title_short | Stroke lesion size – Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models |
title_sort | stroke lesion size – still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37741168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sperberchristoph strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels AT galluccilaura strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels AT mirmandaniel strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels AT arnoldmarcel strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels AT umarovarozam strokelesionsizestillausefulbiomarkerforstrokeseverityandoutcomeintimesofhighdimensionalmodels |