Cargando…

Role of simulation in kidney stone disease: A systematic review of literature trends in the 26 years

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques for treatment of urinary stones requires expertise, experience and endoscopic skills. Simulators provide a low-stress and low-risk environment while providing a realistic set-up and training opportunities. AIM: To report the publication trend of ‘simulation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nedbal, Carlotta, Jahrreiss, Victoria, Cerrato, Clara, Pietropaolo, Amelia, Galosi, Andrea, Veneziano, Domenico, Kallidonis, Panagiotis, Somani, Bhaskar K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766839
http://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v12.i4.104
_version_ 1785109990788300800
author Nedbal, Carlotta
Jahrreiss, Victoria
Cerrato, Clara
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Galosi, Andrea
Veneziano, Domenico
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
Somani, Bhaskar K
author_facet Nedbal, Carlotta
Jahrreiss, Victoria
Cerrato, Clara
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Galosi, Andrea
Veneziano, Domenico
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
Somani, Bhaskar K
author_sort Nedbal, Carlotta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques for treatment of urinary stones requires expertise, experience and endoscopic skills. Simulators provide a low-stress and low-risk environment while providing a realistic set-up and training opportunities. AIM: To report the publication trend of ‘simulation in urolithiasis’ over the last 26 years. METHODS: Research of all published papers on “Simulation in Urolithiasis” was performed through PubMed database over the last 26 years, from January 1997 to December 2022. Papers were labelled and divided in three subgroups: (1) Training papers; (2) Clinical simulation application or surgical procedures; and (3) Diagnostic radiology simulation. Each subgroup was then divided into two 13-year time periods to compare and identify the contrast of different decades: period-1 (1997-2009) and period-2 (2010-2022). RESULTS: A total of 168 articles published on the application of simulation in urolithiasis over the last 26 years (training: n = 94, surgical procedures: n = 66, and radiology: n = 8). The overall number of papers published in simulation in urolithiasis was 35 in Period-1 and 129 in Period-2, an increase of +269% (P = 0.0002). Each subgroup shows a growing trend of publications from Period-1 to Period-2: training papers +279% (P = 0.001), surgical simulations +264% (P = 0.0180) and radiological simulations +200% (P = 0.2105). CONCLUSION: In the last decades there has been a step up of papers regarding training protocols with the aid of various simulation devices, with simulators now a part of training programs. With the development of 3D-printed and high-fidelity models, simulation for surgical procedure planning and patients counseling is also a growing field and this trend will continue to rise in the next few years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105207532023-09-27 Role of simulation in kidney stone disease: A systematic review of literature trends in the 26 years Nedbal, Carlotta Jahrreiss, Victoria Cerrato, Clara Pietropaolo, Amelia Galosi, Andrea Veneziano, Domenico Kallidonis, Panagiotis Somani, Bhaskar K World J Nephrol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques for treatment of urinary stones requires expertise, experience and endoscopic skills. Simulators provide a low-stress and low-risk environment while providing a realistic set-up and training opportunities. AIM: To report the publication trend of ‘simulation in urolithiasis’ over the last 26 years. METHODS: Research of all published papers on “Simulation in Urolithiasis” was performed through PubMed database over the last 26 years, from January 1997 to December 2022. Papers were labelled and divided in three subgroups: (1) Training papers; (2) Clinical simulation application or surgical procedures; and (3) Diagnostic radiology simulation. Each subgroup was then divided into two 13-year time periods to compare and identify the contrast of different decades: period-1 (1997-2009) and period-2 (2010-2022). RESULTS: A total of 168 articles published on the application of simulation in urolithiasis over the last 26 years (training: n = 94, surgical procedures: n = 66, and radiology: n = 8). The overall number of papers published in simulation in urolithiasis was 35 in Period-1 and 129 in Period-2, an increase of +269% (P = 0.0002). Each subgroup shows a growing trend of publications from Period-1 to Period-2: training papers +279% (P = 0.001), surgical simulations +264% (P = 0.0180) and radiological simulations +200% (P = 0.2105). CONCLUSION: In the last decades there has been a step up of papers regarding training protocols with the aid of various simulation devices, with simulators now a part of training programs. With the development of 3D-printed and high-fidelity models, simulation for surgical procedure planning and patients counseling is also a growing field and this trend will continue to rise in the next few years. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-09-25 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10520753/ /pubmed/37766839 http://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v12.i4.104 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Nedbal, Carlotta
Jahrreiss, Victoria
Cerrato, Clara
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Galosi, Andrea
Veneziano, Domenico
Kallidonis, Panagiotis
Somani, Bhaskar K
Role of simulation in kidney stone disease: A systematic review of literature trends in the 26 years
title Role of simulation in kidney stone disease: A systematic review of literature trends in the 26 years
title_full Role of simulation in kidney stone disease: A systematic review of literature trends in the 26 years
title_fullStr Role of simulation in kidney stone disease: A systematic review of literature trends in the 26 years
title_full_unstemmed Role of simulation in kidney stone disease: A systematic review of literature trends in the 26 years
title_short Role of simulation in kidney stone disease: A systematic review of literature trends in the 26 years
title_sort role of simulation in kidney stone disease: a systematic review of literature trends in the 26 years
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766839
http://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v12.i4.104
work_keys_str_mv AT nedbalcarlotta roleofsimulationinkidneystonediseaseasystematicreviewofliteraturetrendsinthe26years
AT jahrreissvictoria roleofsimulationinkidneystonediseaseasystematicreviewofliteraturetrendsinthe26years
AT cerratoclara roleofsimulationinkidneystonediseaseasystematicreviewofliteraturetrendsinthe26years
AT pietropaoloamelia roleofsimulationinkidneystonediseaseasystematicreviewofliteraturetrendsinthe26years
AT galosiandrea roleofsimulationinkidneystonediseaseasystematicreviewofliteraturetrendsinthe26years
AT venezianodomenico roleofsimulationinkidneystonediseaseasystematicreviewofliteraturetrendsinthe26years
AT kallidonispanagiotis roleofsimulationinkidneystonediseaseasystematicreviewofliteraturetrendsinthe26years
AT somanibhaskark roleofsimulationinkidneystonediseaseasystematicreviewofliteraturetrendsinthe26years