Cargando…

The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date

INTRODUCTION: The WHO Regional Office for Europe developed the Guide to tailoring immunization programmes (TIP), offering countries a process through which to diagnose barriers and motivators to vaccination in susceptible low vaccination coverage and design tailored interventions. A review of TIP im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubé, Eve, Leask, Julie, Wolff, Brent, Hickler, Benjamin, Balaban, Victor, Hosein, Everold, Habersaat, Katrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29287678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.012
_version_ 1785110034355585024
author Dubé, Eve
Leask, Julie
Wolff, Brent
Hickler, Benjamin
Balaban, Victor
Hosein, Everold
Habersaat, Katrine
author_facet Dubé, Eve
Leask, Julie
Wolff, Brent
Hickler, Benjamin
Balaban, Victor
Hosein, Everold
Habersaat, Katrine
author_sort Dubé, Eve
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The WHO Regional Office for Europe developed the Guide to tailoring immunization programmes (TIP), offering countries a process through which to diagnose barriers and motivators to vaccination in susceptible low vaccination coverage and design tailored interventions. A review of TIP implementation was conducted in the European Region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The review was conducted during June to December 2016 by an external review committee and was based on visits in Bulgaria, Lithuania, Sweden and the United Kingdom that had conducted a TIP project; review of national and regional TIP documents and an online survey of the Member States in the WHO European Region that had not conducted a TIP project. A review committee workshop was held to formulate conclusions and recommendations. RESULTS: The review found the most commonly cited strengths of the TIP approach to be the social science research as well as the interdisciplinary approach and community engagement, enhancing the ability of programmes to “listen” and learn, to gain an understanding of community and individual perspectives. National immunization managers in the Region are generally aware that TIP exists and that there is strong demand for the type of research it addresses. Further work is needed to assist countries move towards implementable strategies based on the TIP findings, supported by an emphasis on enhanced local ownership; integrated diagnostic and intervention design; and follow-up meetings, advocacy and incentives for decision-makers to implement and invest in strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the perspectives of susceptible and low-coverage populations is crucial to improving immunization programmes. TIP provides a framework that facilitated this in four countries. In the future, the purpose of TIP should go beyond identification of susceptible groups and diagnosis of challenges and ensure a stronger focus on the design of strategies and appropriate and effective interventions to ensure long-term change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105209482023-09-26 The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date Dubé, Eve Leask, Julie Wolff, Brent Hickler, Benjamin Balaban, Victor Hosein, Everold Habersaat, Katrine Vaccine Article INTRODUCTION: The WHO Regional Office for Europe developed the Guide to tailoring immunization programmes (TIP), offering countries a process through which to diagnose barriers and motivators to vaccination in susceptible low vaccination coverage and design tailored interventions. A review of TIP implementation was conducted in the European Region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The review was conducted during June to December 2016 by an external review committee and was based on visits in Bulgaria, Lithuania, Sweden and the United Kingdom that had conducted a TIP project; review of national and regional TIP documents and an online survey of the Member States in the WHO European Region that had not conducted a TIP project. A review committee workshop was held to formulate conclusions and recommendations. RESULTS: The review found the most commonly cited strengths of the TIP approach to be the social science research as well as the interdisciplinary approach and community engagement, enhancing the ability of programmes to “listen” and learn, to gain an understanding of community and individual perspectives. National immunization managers in the Region are generally aware that TIP exists and that there is strong demand for the type of research it addresses. Further work is needed to assist countries move towards implementable strategies based on the TIP findings, supported by an emphasis on enhanced local ownership; integrated diagnostic and intervention design; and follow-up meetings, advocacy and incentives for decision-makers to implement and invest in strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the perspectives of susceptible and low-coverage populations is crucial to improving immunization programmes. TIP provides a framework that facilitated this in four countries. In the future, the purpose of TIP should go beyond identification of susceptible groups and diagnosis of challenges and ensure a stronger focus on the design of strategies and appropriate and effective interventions to ensure long-term change. 2018-03-07 2017-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10520948/ /pubmed/29287678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.012 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Dubé, Eve
Leask, Julie
Wolff, Brent
Hickler, Benjamin
Balaban, Victor
Hosein, Everold
Habersaat, Katrine
The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date
title The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date
title_full The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date
title_fullStr The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date
title_full_unstemmed The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date
title_short The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date
title_sort who tailoring immunization programmes (tip) approach: review of implementation to date
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29287678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.012
work_keys_str_mv AT dubeeve thewhotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT leaskjulie thewhotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT wolffbrent thewhotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT hicklerbenjamin thewhotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT balabanvictor thewhotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT hoseineverold thewhotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT habersaatkatrine thewhotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT dubeeve whotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT leaskjulie whotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT wolffbrent whotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT hicklerbenjamin whotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT balabanvictor whotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT hoseineverold whotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate
AT habersaatkatrine whotailoringimmunizationprogrammestipapproachreviewofimplementationtodate