Cargando…

Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety

INTRODUCTION: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is often used to understand the perceptual basis of acute and chronic conditions, including pain. As the need grows for developing a mechanistic understanding of neurological pathways underlying perception in the basic and clinical sciences, there is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ayeong (Jenny), Szabo, Edina, Lunde, Claire E., Comptdaer, Gabriela, Zurakowski, David, Sieberg, Christine B., Holmes, Scott A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1223239
_version_ 1785110035807862784
author Kim, Ayeong (Jenny)
Szabo, Edina
Lunde, Claire E.
Comptdaer, Gabriela
Zurakowski, David
Sieberg, Christine B.
Holmes, Scott A.
author_facet Kim, Ayeong (Jenny)
Szabo, Edina
Lunde, Claire E.
Comptdaer, Gabriela
Zurakowski, David
Sieberg, Christine B.
Holmes, Scott A.
author_sort Kim, Ayeong (Jenny)
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is often used to understand the perceptual basis of acute and chronic conditions, including pain. As the need grows for developing a mechanistic understanding of neurological pathways underlying perception in the basic and clinical sciences, there is a greater need to adapt techniques such as QST to the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. No studies have yet evaluated the impact of the MR environment on the perception of thermal stimuli. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in temperature sensitivity outside an MR environment and during an MRI scanning session. We hypothesized that there would be a difference in how participants reported their pain sensitivity between the two environments. METHODS: Healthy participants underwent thermal QST outside the MR scanning environment, where they were asked to rate the temperature of a noxious stimulus at which they perceived their pain to be 7/10, using a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10. Participants repeated this procedure inside a 3.0 T MRI approximately 30 min later. We repeated our investigation in a clinical cohort of participants with a chronic pain condition. RESULTS: There were statistically significant changes of 1.1°C in thermal sensitivity between environments. This increase in pain threshold was found in healthy participants and replicated in the clinical cohort. DISCUSSION: Findings can be applied toward improving MR safety, the resolution of brain pathways underlying pain mechanisms, and to more broadly comment on the impact of the MR environment on investigations that integrate perception-influenced processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10520956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105209562023-09-27 Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety Kim, Ayeong (Jenny) Szabo, Edina Lunde, Claire E. Comptdaer, Gabriela Zurakowski, David Sieberg, Christine B. Holmes, Scott A. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research INTRODUCTION: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is often used to understand the perceptual basis of acute and chronic conditions, including pain. As the need grows for developing a mechanistic understanding of neurological pathways underlying perception in the basic and clinical sciences, there is a greater need to adapt techniques such as QST to the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. No studies have yet evaluated the impact of the MR environment on the perception of thermal stimuli. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in temperature sensitivity outside an MR environment and during an MRI scanning session. We hypothesized that there would be a difference in how participants reported their pain sensitivity between the two environments. METHODS: Healthy participants underwent thermal QST outside the MR scanning environment, where they were asked to rate the temperature of a noxious stimulus at which they perceived their pain to be 7/10, using a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10. Participants repeated this procedure inside a 3.0 T MRI approximately 30 min later. We repeated our investigation in a clinical cohort of participants with a chronic pain condition. RESULTS: There were statistically significant changes of 1.1°C in thermal sensitivity between environments. This increase in pain threshold was found in healthy participants and replicated in the clinical cohort. DISCUSSION: Findings can be applied toward improving MR safety, the resolution of brain pathways underlying pain mechanisms, and to more broadly comment on the impact of the MR environment on investigations that integrate perception-influenced processes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10520956/ /pubmed/37766817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1223239 Text en © 2023 Kim, Szabo, Lunde, Comptdaer, Zurakowski, Sieberg and Holmes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pain Research
Kim, Ayeong (Jenny)
Szabo, Edina
Lunde, Claire E.
Comptdaer, Gabriela
Zurakowski, David
Sieberg, Christine B.
Holmes, Scott A.
Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety
title Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety
title_full Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety
title_fullStr Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety
title_short Quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety
title_sort quantitative sensory testing in a magnetic resonance environment: considerations for thermal sensitivity and patient safety
topic Pain Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1223239
work_keys_str_mv AT kimayeongjenny quantitativesensorytestinginamagneticresonanceenvironmentconsiderationsforthermalsensitivityandpatientsafety
AT szaboedina quantitativesensorytestinginamagneticresonanceenvironmentconsiderationsforthermalsensitivityandpatientsafety
AT lundeclairee quantitativesensorytestinginamagneticresonanceenvironmentconsiderationsforthermalsensitivityandpatientsafety
AT comptdaergabriela quantitativesensorytestinginamagneticresonanceenvironmentconsiderationsforthermalsensitivityandpatientsafety
AT zurakowskidavid quantitativesensorytestinginamagneticresonanceenvironmentconsiderationsforthermalsensitivityandpatientsafety
AT siebergchristineb quantitativesensorytestinginamagneticresonanceenvironmentconsiderationsforthermalsensitivityandpatientsafety
AT holmesscotta quantitativesensorytestinginamagneticresonanceenvironmentconsiderationsforthermalsensitivityandpatientsafety