Cargando…

Bronchoalveolar Lavage as Potential Diagnostic Specimens to Genetic Testing in Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

Background: There is limited knowledge on the yield of performing capture-based targeted ultradeep sequencing on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens from advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate gene variations and performance characteristics in BAL and ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Xuwen, Cai, Yazhou, Zong, Chenyu, Chen, Binbin, Shao, Di, Cui, Hao, Li, Zheng, Xu, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10521282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37743841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231202881
Descripción
Sumario:Background: There is limited knowledge on the yield of performing capture-based targeted ultradeep sequencing on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens from advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate gene variations and performance characteristics in BAL and tissue specimens using targeted sequencing. Methods: This cohort study retrospectively enrolled 20 patients with advanced NSCLC. The variant detection percentage, correlation of tumor mutation burden (TMB), and allele frequency heterogeneity (AFH) were compared between paired BAL and tissue samples. A three-tiered system was also applied for the interpretation of gene variants according to the guidelines. Results: No statistical difference was observed in variant detection between BAL and tissue samples (P = .591 for variant tier and P = .409 for variant type). In general, BAL achieved higher detection rates in tier I variants (96.2% vs 84.6%) and gene fusions (75% vs 50%) compared with tissue samples; tissue samples had better variants detection rates for other variants, such as tier II (89.6% vs 76.0%), tier III (87.1% vs 72.6%), single nucleotide variant (SNV, 89.6% vs 76.5%), insertion/deletion/duplication (InDel, 74.6% vs 69.8%) and copy number variation (CNV, 93.8% vs 43.8%). Besides, there were significant correlations of TMB (R(2) = 0.96, P < .001) and AFH (R(2) = 0.87, P < .001) between BALs and paired tissues. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that BAL may serve as a supplement in liquid biopsy for mutation detection and for routine utilization in clinical settings.