Cargando…
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of combination therapy versus monotherapy in malignant melanoma
BACKGROUND: Until 2010, stage III or IV malignant melanoma (MM) had a poor prognosis. The discovery of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 2011 changed the treatment landscape. Promising results in patient survival with a checkpoint inhibitor prompted research into combination therapies. In 2016,...
Autores principales: | Özdemir, Dilay, Büssgen, Melanie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10521452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37749653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00611-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Healthcare cost comparison analysis of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab versus nivolumab monotherapy and ipilimumab monotherapy in advanced melanoma
por: Potluri, Ravi, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Colistin monotherapy versus therapy combination
por: Charra, B, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Severe complications of nivolumab monotherapy in an adolescent with malignant melanoma
por: Grzegorczyk, Aleksandra, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antifungal therapy with voriconazole and anidulafungin versus voriconazole monotherapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain
por: Grau, Santiago, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy
por: Pradeep, Jnaneshwari, et al.
Publicado: (2022)