Cargando…
Advances in In Vitro and In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering
Craniofacial reconstruction requires robust bone of specified geometry for the repair to be both functional and aesthetic. While native bone from elsewhere in the body can be harvested, shaped, and implanted within a defect, using either an in vitro or in vivo bioreactors eliminates donor site morbi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AAAS
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10521661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37849672 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/bmef.0004 |
_version_ | 1785110179198533632 |
---|---|
author | Watson, Emma Mikos, Antonios G. |
author_facet | Watson, Emma Mikos, Antonios G. |
author_sort | Watson, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Craniofacial reconstruction requires robust bone of specified geometry for the repair to be both functional and aesthetic. While native bone from elsewhere in the body can be harvested, shaped, and implanted within a defect, using either an in vitro or in vivo bioreactors eliminates donor site morbidity while increasing the customizability of the generated tissue. In vitro bioreactors utilize cells harvested from the patient, a scaffold, and a device to increase mass transfer of nutrients, oxygen, and waste, allowing for generation of larger viable tissues. In vivo bioreactors utilize the patient’s own body as a source of cells and of nutrient transfer and involve the implantation of a scaffold with or without growth factors adjacent to vasculature, followed by the eventual transfer of vascularized, mineralized tissue to the defect site. Several different models of in vitro bioreactors exist, and several different implantation sites have been successfully utilized for in vivo tissue generation and defect repair in humans. In this review, we discuss the specifics of each bioreactor strategy, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each and the future directions for the engineering of bony tissues for craniofacial defect repair. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10521661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AAAS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105216612023-10-17 Advances in In Vitro and In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering Watson, Emma Mikos, Antonios G. BME Front Review Craniofacial reconstruction requires robust bone of specified geometry for the repair to be both functional and aesthetic. While native bone from elsewhere in the body can be harvested, shaped, and implanted within a defect, using either an in vitro or in vivo bioreactors eliminates donor site morbidity while increasing the customizability of the generated tissue. In vitro bioreactors utilize cells harvested from the patient, a scaffold, and a device to increase mass transfer of nutrients, oxygen, and waste, allowing for generation of larger viable tissues. In vivo bioreactors utilize the patient’s own body as a source of cells and of nutrient transfer and involve the implantation of a scaffold with or without growth factors adjacent to vasculature, followed by the eventual transfer of vascularized, mineralized tissue to the defect site. Several different models of in vitro bioreactors exist, and several different implantation sites have been successfully utilized for in vivo tissue generation and defect repair in humans. In this review, we discuss the specifics of each bioreactor strategy, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each and the future directions for the engineering of bony tissues for craniofacial defect repair. AAAS 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10521661/ /pubmed/37849672 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/bmef.0004 Text en Copyright © 2023 Emma Watson and Antonios G. Mikos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Exclusive licensee Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, CAS. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Watson, Emma Mikos, Antonios G. Advances in In Vitro and In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering |
title | Advances in In Vitro and In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering |
title_full | Advances in In Vitro and In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering |
title_fullStr | Advances in In Vitro and In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Advances in In Vitro and In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering |
title_short | Advances in In Vitro and In Vivo Bioreactor-Based Bone Generation for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering |
title_sort | advances in in vitro and in vivo bioreactor-based bone generation for craniofacial tissue engineering |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10521661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37849672 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/bmef.0004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watsonemma advancesininvitroandinvivobioreactorbasedbonegenerationforcraniofacialtissueengineering AT mikosantoniosg advancesininvitroandinvivobioreactorbasedbonegenerationforcraniofacialtissueengineering |