Cargando…

Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of No-Dissection Nasal Dorsum Using Subdorsal Septal Excision in Preservation Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND: Dorsal preservation (DP) caused privilege change in the concept of rhinoplasty and a promising superior functional and aesthetic transformation in rhinoplasty surgery. Avoiding dissection of the dorsal nasal bone and cartilage will leave the soft-tissue envelope intact, leading to a fine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qaradaxi, Kurdo Akram, Mohammed, Ayad Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10521777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010335
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Dorsal preservation (DP) caused privilege change in the concept of rhinoplasty and a promising superior functional and aesthetic transformation in rhinoplasty surgery. Avoiding dissection of the dorsal nasal bone and cartilage will leave the soft-tissue envelope intact, leading to a fine and smooth appearance, faster operation with less subsequent edema, and overall preservation of the dorsal aesthetic line. METHODS: This prospective study included 113 patients who underwent DP rhinoplasty for nasal hump treatment with minimum dissection of nasal dorsum soft-tissue envelope. Results were evaluated using the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS). RESULTS: The mean preoperative SCHNOS score was 7.21; the mean obstructive score was 2.95 ± 1.068 and the mean aesthetic score was 4.27 ± 0.771. The average lowering of the dorsal hump was 4.4 mm. Approximately 96% of patients showed improvement in the SCHNOS score after surgery, 86.7% (98 patients) showed improvement in the obstructive symptoms and 95.6% (108 patients) showed improvement in the aesthetic score. Complications were seen in 22.11% (most commonly residual hump in 13.27% of cases and dorsal indentation in 5.31%), bleeding was seen in 2.65%, and granuloma formation at the dorsal osteotomy site was seen in 0.88%. There was a very significant improvement in the aesthetic, obstructive, and overall SCHNOS score (P = 0.000) for each parameter. CONCLUSIONS: DP rhinoplasty is a safe and very effective procedure, with very low risk of complications. Most of the treated patients have improvement of the obstructive and aesthetic outcome after surgery. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.