Cargando…

Clinical and functional variables can predict general fatigue in patients with acromegaly: an explanatory model approach

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether hormonal profile, arterial function, and physical capacity are predictors of fatigue in patients with acromegaly. Subjects and methods: This is a cross-sectional study including 23 patients. The subjects underwent a Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) assessment; seru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michalski, André da Cunha, Ferreira, Arthur de Sá, Kasuki, Leandro, Gadelha, Monica R., Lopes, Agnaldo José, Guimarães, Fernando Silva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31038594
http://dx.doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000127
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether hormonal profile, arterial function, and physical capacity are predictors of fatigue in patients with acromegaly. Subjects and methods: This is a cross-sectional study including 23 patients. The subjects underwent a Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) assessment; serum growth hormones (GH) and IGF-1 measurements; pulse wave analysis comprising pulse wave velocity (PWV), arterial compliance (AC), and the reflection index (IR(1,2)); dominant upper limb dynamometry (DYN); and the six-minute walking distance test (6MWT). Multiple linear regression models were used to identify predictors for MFIS. The coefficient of determination R(2) was used to assess the quality of the models’ fit. The best model was further analyzed using a calibration plot and a limits of agreement (LOA) plot. RESULTS: The mean ± SD values for the participants’ age, MFIS, PWV, AC, IR(1,2), DYN, and the distance in the 6MWT were 49.4 ± 11.2 years, 31.2 ± 18.9 score, 10.19 ± 2.34 m/s, 1.08 ± 0.46 x10(6) cm(5)/din, 85.3 ± 29.7%, 33.9 ± 9.3 kgf, and 603.0 ± 106.1 m, respectively. The best predictive model (R(2) = 0.378, R(2) adjusted = 0.280, standard error = 16.1, and P = 0.026) comprised the following regression equation: MFIS = 48.85 - (7.913 × IGF-I) + (1.483 × AC) - (23.281 × DYN). CONCLUSION: Hormonal, vascular, and functional variables can predict general fatigue in patients with acromegaly.