Cargando…

Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant glioma, with an overall median survival of less than two years. The ability to predict survival before treatment in GBM patients would lead to improved disease management, clinical trial enrollment, and patient care. METHODS: GB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luckett, Patrick H., Olufawo, Michael, Lamichhane, Bidhan, Park, Ki Yun, Dierker, Donna, Verastegui, Gabriel Trevino, Yang, Peter, Kim, Albert H., Chheda, Milan G., Snyder, Abraham Z., Shimony, Joshua S., Leuthardt, Eric C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37668941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8
_version_ 1785110374877495296
author Luckett, Patrick H.
Olufawo, Michael
Lamichhane, Bidhan
Park, Ki Yun
Dierker, Donna
Verastegui, Gabriel Trevino
Yang, Peter
Kim, Albert H.
Chheda, Milan G.
Snyder, Abraham Z.
Shimony, Joshua S.
Leuthardt, Eric C.
author_facet Luckett, Patrick H.
Olufawo, Michael
Lamichhane, Bidhan
Park, Ki Yun
Dierker, Donna
Verastegui, Gabriel Trevino
Yang, Peter
Kim, Albert H.
Chheda, Milan G.
Snyder, Abraham Z.
Shimony, Joshua S.
Leuthardt, Eric C.
author_sort Luckett, Patrick H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant glioma, with an overall median survival of less than two years. The ability to predict survival before treatment in GBM patients would lead to improved disease management, clinical trial enrollment, and patient care. METHODS: GBM patients (N = 133, mean age 60.8 years, median survival 14.1 months, 57.9% male) were retrospectively recruited from the neurosurgery brain tumor service at Washington University Medical Center. All patients completed structural neuroimaging and resting state functional MRI (RS-fMRI) before surgery. Demographics, measures of cortical thickness (CT), and resting state functional network connectivity (FC) were used to train a deep neural network to classify patients based on survival (< 1y, 1-2y, >2y). Permutation feature importance identified the strongest predictors of survival based on the trained models. RESULTS: The models achieved a combined cross-validation and hold out accuracy of 90.6% in classifying survival (< 1y, 1-2y, >2y). The strongest demographic predictors were age at diagnosis and sex. The strongest CT predictors of survival included the superior temporal sulcus, parahippocampal gyrus, pericalcarine, pars triangularis, and middle temporal regions. The strongest FC features primarily involved dorsal and inferior somatomotor, visual, and cingulo-opercular networks. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that machine learning can accurately classify survival in GBM patients based on multimodal neuroimaging before any surgical or medical intervention. These results were achieved without information regarding presentation symptoms, treatments, postsurgical outcomes, or tumor genomic information. Our results suggest GBMs have a global effect on the brain’s structural and functional organization, which is predictive of survival. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10522528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105225282023-09-28 Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning Luckett, Patrick H. Olufawo, Michael Lamichhane, Bidhan Park, Ki Yun Dierker, Donna Verastegui, Gabriel Trevino Yang, Peter Kim, Albert H. Chheda, Milan G. Snyder, Abraham Z. Shimony, Joshua S. Leuthardt, Eric C. J Neurooncol Research PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant glioma, with an overall median survival of less than two years. The ability to predict survival before treatment in GBM patients would lead to improved disease management, clinical trial enrollment, and patient care. METHODS: GBM patients (N = 133, mean age 60.8 years, median survival 14.1 months, 57.9% male) were retrospectively recruited from the neurosurgery brain tumor service at Washington University Medical Center. All patients completed structural neuroimaging and resting state functional MRI (RS-fMRI) before surgery. Demographics, measures of cortical thickness (CT), and resting state functional network connectivity (FC) were used to train a deep neural network to classify patients based on survival (< 1y, 1-2y, >2y). Permutation feature importance identified the strongest predictors of survival based on the trained models. RESULTS: The models achieved a combined cross-validation and hold out accuracy of 90.6% in classifying survival (< 1y, 1-2y, >2y). The strongest demographic predictors were age at diagnosis and sex. The strongest CT predictors of survival included the superior temporal sulcus, parahippocampal gyrus, pericalcarine, pars triangularis, and middle temporal regions. The strongest FC features primarily involved dorsal and inferior somatomotor, visual, and cingulo-opercular networks. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that machine learning can accurately classify survival in GBM patients based on multimodal neuroimaging before any surgical or medical intervention. These results were achieved without information regarding presentation symptoms, treatments, postsurgical outcomes, or tumor genomic information. Our results suggest GBMs have a global effect on the brain’s structural and functional organization, which is predictive of survival. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8. Springer US 2023-09-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10522528/ /pubmed/37668941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Luckett, Patrick H.
Olufawo, Michael
Lamichhane, Bidhan
Park, Ki Yun
Dierker, Donna
Verastegui, Gabriel Trevino
Yang, Peter
Kim, Albert H.
Chheda, Milan G.
Snyder, Abraham Z.
Shimony, Joshua S.
Leuthardt, Eric C.
Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning
title Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning
title_full Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning
title_fullStr Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning
title_short Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning
title_sort predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37668941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8
work_keys_str_mv AT luckettpatrickh predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT olufawomichael predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT lamichhanebidhan predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT parkkiyun predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT dierkerdonna predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT verasteguigabrieltrevino predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT yangpeter predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT kimalberth predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT chhedamilang predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT snyderabrahamz predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT shimonyjoshuas predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning
AT leuthardtericc predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning