Cargando…
Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning
PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant glioma, with an overall median survival of less than two years. The ability to predict survival before treatment in GBM patients would lead to improved disease management, clinical trial enrollment, and patient care. METHODS: GB...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37668941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8 |
_version_ | 1785110374877495296 |
---|---|
author | Luckett, Patrick H. Olufawo, Michael Lamichhane, Bidhan Park, Ki Yun Dierker, Donna Verastegui, Gabriel Trevino Yang, Peter Kim, Albert H. Chheda, Milan G. Snyder, Abraham Z. Shimony, Joshua S. Leuthardt, Eric C. |
author_facet | Luckett, Patrick H. Olufawo, Michael Lamichhane, Bidhan Park, Ki Yun Dierker, Donna Verastegui, Gabriel Trevino Yang, Peter Kim, Albert H. Chheda, Milan G. Snyder, Abraham Z. Shimony, Joshua S. Leuthardt, Eric C. |
author_sort | Luckett, Patrick H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant glioma, with an overall median survival of less than two years. The ability to predict survival before treatment in GBM patients would lead to improved disease management, clinical trial enrollment, and patient care. METHODS: GBM patients (N = 133, mean age 60.8 years, median survival 14.1 months, 57.9% male) were retrospectively recruited from the neurosurgery brain tumor service at Washington University Medical Center. All patients completed structural neuroimaging and resting state functional MRI (RS-fMRI) before surgery. Demographics, measures of cortical thickness (CT), and resting state functional network connectivity (FC) were used to train a deep neural network to classify patients based on survival (< 1y, 1-2y, >2y). Permutation feature importance identified the strongest predictors of survival based on the trained models. RESULTS: The models achieved a combined cross-validation and hold out accuracy of 90.6% in classifying survival (< 1y, 1-2y, >2y). The strongest demographic predictors were age at diagnosis and sex. The strongest CT predictors of survival included the superior temporal sulcus, parahippocampal gyrus, pericalcarine, pars triangularis, and middle temporal regions. The strongest FC features primarily involved dorsal and inferior somatomotor, visual, and cingulo-opercular networks. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that machine learning can accurately classify survival in GBM patients based on multimodal neuroimaging before any surgical or medical intervention. These results were achieved without information regarding presentation symptoms, treatments, postsurgical outcomes, or tumor genomic information. Our results suggest GBMs have a global effect on the brain’s structural and functional organization, which is predictive of survival. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10522528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105225282023-09-28 Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning Luckett, Patrick H. Olufawo, Michael Lamichhane, Bidhan Park, Ki Yun Dierker, Donna Verastegui, Gabriel Trevino Yang, Peter Kim, Albert H. Chheda, Milan G. Snyder, Abraham Z. Shimony, Joshua S. Leuthardt, Eric C. J Neurooncol Research PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant glioma, with an overall median survival of less than two years. The ability to predict survival before treatment in GBM patients would lead to improved disease management, clinical trial enrollment, and patient care. METHODS: GBM patients (N = 133, mean age 60.8 years, median survival 14.1 months, 57.9% male) were retrospectively recruited from the neurosurgery brain tumor service at Washington University Medical Center. All patients completed structural neuroimaging and resting state functional MRI (RS-fMRI) before surgery. Demographics, measures of cortical thickness (CT), and resting state functional network connectivity (FC) were used to train a deep neural network to classify patients based on survival (< 1y, 1-2y, >2y). Permutation feature importance identified the strongest predictors of survival based on the trained models. RESULTS: The models achieved a combined cross-validation and hold out accuracy of 90.6% in classifying survival (< 1y, 1-2y, >2y). The strongest demographic predictors were age at diagnosis and sex. The strongest CT predictors of survival included the superior temporal sulcus, parahippocampal gyrus, pericalcarine, pars triangularis, and middle temporal regions. The strongest FC features primarily involved dorsal and inferior somatomotor, visual, and cingulo-opercular networks. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that machine learning can accurately classify survival in GBM patients based on multimodal neuroimaging before any surgical or medical intervention. These results were achieved without information regarding presentation symptoms, treatments, postsurgical outcomes, or tumor genomic information. Our results suggest GBMs have a global effect on the brain’s structural and functional organization, which is predictive of survival. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8. Springer US 2023-09-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10522528/ /pubmed/37668941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Luckett, Patrick H. Olufawo, Michael Lamichhane, Bidhan Park, Ki Yun Dierker, Donna Verastegui, Gabriel Trevino Yang, Peter Kim, Albert H. Chheda, Milan G. Snyder, Abraham Z. Shimony, Joshua S. Leuthardt, Eric C. Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning |
title | Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning |
title_full | Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning |
title_fullStr | Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning |
title_short | Predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning |
title_sort | predicting survival in glioblastoma with multimodal neuroimaging and machine learning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37668941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04439-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luckettpatrickh predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT olufawomichael predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT lamichhanebidhan predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT parkkiyun predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT dierkerdonna predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT verasteguigabrieltrevino predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT yangpeter predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT kimalberth predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT chhedamilang predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT snyderabrahamz predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT shimonyjoshuas predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning AT leuthardtericc predictingsurvivalinglioblastomawithmultimodalneuroimagingandmachinelearning |