Cargando…

Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND: Composite invasive and non-invasive data consistently demonstrate that resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) in regions of known transmural myocardial scar (TMS) converge on a value of ~ 0.30 mL/min/g or lower. This value has been confirmed using the 3 most common myocardial perfusion age...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bober, Robert M., Milani, Richard V., Kachur, Sergey M., Morin, Daniel P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7
_version_ 1785110377091039232
author Bober, Robert M.
Milani, Richard V.
Kachur, Sergey M.
Morin, Daniel P.
author_facet Bober, Robert M.
Milani, Richard V.
Kachur, Sergey M.
Morin, Daniel P.
author_sort Bober, Robert M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Composite invasive and non-invasive data consistently demonstrate that resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) in regions of known transmural myocardial scar (TMS) converge on a value of ~ 0.30 mL/min/g or lower. This value has been confirmed using the 3 most common myocardial perfusion agents ((13)N, (15)O-H(2)O and (82)Rb) incorporating various kinetic models on older 2D positron emission tomography (PET) systems. Thus, rMBF in regions of TMS can serve as a reference “truth” to evaluate low-end accuracy of various PET systems and software packages (SWPs). Using (82)Rb on a contemporary 3D-PET-CT system, we sought to determine whether currently available SWP can accurately and precisely measure rMBF in regions of known TMS. RESULTS: Median rMBF (in mL/min/g) and COV in regions of TMS were 0.71 [IQR 0.52–1.02] and 0.16 with 4DM; 0.41 [0.34–0.54] and 0.10 with 4DM-FVD; 0.66 [0.51–0.85] and 0.11 with Cedars; 0.51 [0.43–0.61] and 0.08 with Emory-Votaw; 0.37 [0.30–0.42], 0.07 with Emory-Ottawa, and 0.26 [0.23–0.32], COV 0.07 with HeartSee. CONCLUSIONS: SWPs varied widely in low end accuracy based on measurement of rMBF in regions of known TMS. 3D PET using (82)Rb and HeartSee software accurately (0.26 mL/min/g, consistent with established values) and precisely (COV = 0.07) quantified rMBF in regions of TMS. The Emory-Ottawa software yielded the next-best accuracy (0.37 mL/min/g), though rMBF was higher than established gold-standard values in ~ 5% of the resting scans. 4DM, 4DM-FDV, Cedars and Emory-Votaw SWP consistently resulted values higher than the established gold standard (0.71, 0.41, 0.66, 0.51 mL/min/g, respectively), with higher interscan variability (0.16, 0.11, 0.11, and 0.09, respectively). Trial registration: clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05286593, Registered December 28, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05286593. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10522549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105225492023-09-28 Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography Bober, Robert M. Milani, Richard V. Kachur, Sergey M. Morin, Daniel P. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Composite invasive and non-invasive data consistently demonstrate that resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) in regions of known transmural myocardial scar (TMS) converge on a value of ~ 0.30 mL/min/g or lower. This value has been confirmed using the 3 most common myocardial perfusion agents ((13)N, (15)O-H(2)O and (82)Rb) incorporating various kinetic models on older 2D positron emission tomography (PET) systems. Thus, rMBF in regions of TMS can serve as a reference “truth” to evaluate low-end accuracy of various PET systems and software packages (SWPs). Using (82)Rb on a contemporary 3D-PET-CT system, we sought to determine whether currently available SWP can accurately and precisely measure rMBF in regions of known TMS. RESULTS: Median rMBF (in mL/min/g) and COV in regions of TMS were 0.71 [IQR 0.52–1.02] and 0.16 with 4DM; 0.41 [0.34–0.54] and 0.10 with 4DM-FVD; 0.66 [0.51–0.85] and 0.11 with Cedars; 0.51 [0.43–0.61] and 0.08 with Emory-Votaw; 0.37 [0.30–0.42], 0.07 with Emory-Ottawa, and 0.26 [0.23–0.32], COV 0.07 with HeartSee. CONCLUSIONS: SWPs varied widely in low end accuracy based on measurement of rMBF in regions of known TMS. 3D PET using (82)Rb and HeartSee software accurately (0.26 mL/min/g, consistent with established values) and precisely (COV = 0.07) quantified rMBF in regions of TMS. The Emory-Ottawa software yielded the next-best accuracy (0.37 mL/min/g), though rMBF was higher than established gold-standard values in ~ 5% of the resting scans. 4DM, 4DM-FDV, Cedars and Emory-Votaw SWP consistently resulted values higher than the established gold standard (0.71, 0.41, 0.66, 0.51 mL/min/g, respectively), with higher interscan variability (0.16, 0.11, 0.11, and 0.09, respectively). Trial registration: clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05286593, Registered December 28, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05286593. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10522549/ /pubmed/37752344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Bober, Robert M.
Milani, Richard V.
Kachur, Sergey M.
Morin, Daniel P.
Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography
title Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography
title_full Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography
title_fullStr Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography
title_short Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography
title_sort assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3d cardiac positron emission tomography
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7
work_keys_str_mv AT boberrobertm assessmentofrestingmyocardialbloodflowinregionsofknowntransmuralscartoconfirmaccuracyandprecisionof3dcardiacpositronemissiontomography
AT milanirichardv assessmentofrestingmyocardialbloodflowinregionsofknowntransmuralscartoconfirmaccuracyandprecisionof3dcardiacpositronemissiontomography
AT kachursergeym assessmentofrestingmyocardialbloodflowinregionsofknowntransmuralscartoconfirmaccuracyandprecisionof3dcardiacpositronemissiontomography
AT morindanielp assessmentofrestingmyocardialbloodflowinregionsofknowntransmuralscartoconfirmaccuracyandprecisionof3dcardiacpositronemissiontomography