Cargando…
Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography
BACKGROUND: Composite invasive and non-invasive data consistently demonstrate that resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) in regions of known transmural myocardial scar (TMS) converge on a value of ~ 0.30 mL/min/g or lower. This value has been confirmed using the 3 most common myocardial perfusion age...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7 |
_version_ | 1785110377091039232 |
---|---|
author | Bober, Robert M. Milani, Richard V. Kachur, Sergey M. Morin, Daniel P. |
author_facet | Bober, Robert M. Milani, Richard V. Kachur, Sergey M. Morin, Daniel P. |
author_sort | Bober, Robert M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Composite invasive and non-invasive data consistently demonstrate that resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) in regions of known transmural myocardial scar (TMS) converge on a value of ~ 0.30 mL/min/g or lower. This value has been confirmed using the 3 most common myocardial perfusion agents ((13)N, (15)O-H(2)O and (82)Rb) incorporating various kinetic models on older 2D positron emission tomography (PET) systems. Thus, rMBF in regions of TMS can serve as a reference “truth” to evaluate low-end accuracy of various PET systems and software packages (SWPs). Using (82)Rb on a contemporary 3D-PET-CT system, we sought to determine whether currently available SWP can accurately and precisely measure rMBF in regions of known TMS. RESULTS: Median rMBF (in mL/min/g) and COV in regions of TMS were 0.71 [IQR 0.52–1.02] and 0.16 with 4DM; 0.41 [0.34–0.54] and 0.10 with 4DM-FVD; 0.66 [0.51–0.85] and 0.11 with Cedars; 0.51 [0.43–0.61] and 0.08 with Emory-Votaw; 0.37 [0.30–0.42], 0.07 with Emory-Ottawa, and 0.26 [0.23–0.32], COV 0.07 with HeartSee. CONCLUSIONS: SWPs varied widely in low end accuracy based on measurement of rMBF in regions of known TMS. 3D PET using (82)Rb and HeartSee software accurately (0.26 mL/min/g, consistent with established values) and precisely (COV = 0.07) quantified rMBF in regions of TMS. The Emory-Ottawa software yielded the next-best accuracy (0.37 mL/min/g), though rMBF was higher than established gold-standard values in ~ 5% of the resting scans. 4DM, 4DM-FDV, Cedars and Emory-Votaw SWP consistently resulted values higher than the established gold standard (0.71, 0.41, 0.66, 0.51 mL/min/g, respectively), with higher interscan variability (0.16, 0.11, 0.11, and 0.09, respectively). Trial registration: clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05286593, Registered December 28, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05286593. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10522549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105225492023-09-28 Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography Bober, Robert M. Milani, Richard V. Kachur, Sergey M. Morin, Daniel P. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Composite invasive and non-invasive data consistently demonstrate that resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) in regions of known transmural myocardial scar (TMS) converge on a value of ~ 0.30 mL/min/g or lower. This value has been confirmed using the 3 most common myocardial perfusion agents ((13)N, (15)O-H(2)O and (82)Rb) incorporating various kinetic models on older 2D positron emission tomography (PET) systems. Thus, rMBF in regions of TMS can serve as a reference “truth” to evaluate low-end accuracy of various PET systems and software packages (SWPs). Using (82)Rb on a contemporary 3D-PET-CT system, we sought to determine whether currently available SWP can accurately and precisely measure rMBF in regions of known TMS. RESULTS: Median rMBF (in mL/min/g) and COV in regions of TMS were 0.71 [IQR 0.52–1.02] and 0.16 with 4DM; 0.41 [0.34–0.54] and 0.10 with 4DM-FVD; 0.66 [0.51–0.85] and 0.11 with Cedars; 0.51 [0.43–0.61] and 0.08 with Emory-Votaw; 0.37 [0.30–0.42], 0.07 with Emory-Ottawa, and 0.26 [0.23–0.32], COV 0.07 with HeartSee. CONCLUSIONS: SWPs varied widely in low end accuracy based on measurement of rMBF in regions of known TMS. 3D PET using (82)Rb and HeartSee software accurately (0.26 mL/min/g, consistent with established values) and precisely (COV = 0.07) quantified rMBF in regions of TMS. The Emory-Ottawa software yielded the next-best accuracy (0.37 mL/min/g), though rMBF was higher than established gold-standard values in ~ 5% of the resting scans. 4DM, 4DM-FDV, Cedars and Emory-Votaw SWP consistently resulted values higher than the established gold standard (0.71, 0.41, 0.66, 0.51 mL/min/g, respectively), with higher interscan variability (0.16, 0.11, 0.11, and 0.09, respectively). Trial registration: clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05286593, Registered December 28, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05286593. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10522549/ /pubmed/37752344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bober, Robert M. Milani, Richard V. Kachur, Sergey M. Morin, Daniel P. Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography |
title | Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography |
title_full | Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography |
title_fullStr | Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography |
title_short | Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography |
title_sort | assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3d cardiac positron emission tomography |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01037-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boberrobertm assessmentofrestingmyocardialbloodflowinregionsofknowntransmuralscartoconfirmaccuracyandprecisionof3dcardiacpositronemissiontomography AT milanirichardv assessmentofrestingmyocardialbloodflowinregionsofknowntransmuralscartoconfirmaccuracyandprecisionof3dcardiacpositronemissiontomography AT kachursergeym assessmentofrestingmyocardialbloodflowinregionsofknowntransmuralscartoconfirmaccuracyandprecisionof3dcardiacpositronemissiontomography AT morindanielp assessmentofrestingmyocardialbloodflowinregionsofknowntransmuralscartoconfirmaccuracyandprecisionof3dcardiacpositronemissiontomography |