Cargando…

Combined FOLFOX4 with all-trans retinoic acid versus FOLFOX4 with placebo in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: a randomized, double-blind comparative study

The majority of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Currently, there are only a few therapeutic methods available for patients with advanced HCC and extrahepatic metastasis (EHM). Systemic chemotherapy, such as FOLFOX4 (infusions of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Juxian, Mao, Feifei, Liu, Chang, Zhang, Fan, Jiang, Dafeng, Guo, Weixing, Huo, Lei, Zhou, Liping, Lau, Wan Yee, Shi, Jie, Cheng, Shuqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01604-3
_version_ 1785110382175584256
author Sun, Juxian
Mao, Feifei
Liu, Chang
Zhang, Fan
Jiang, Dafeng
Guo, Weixing
Huo, Lei
Zhou, Liping
Lau, Wan Yee
Shi, Jie
Cheng, Shuqun
author_facet Sun, Juxian
Mao, Feifei
Liu, Chang
Zhang, Fan
Jiang, Dafeng
Guo, Weixing
Huo, Lei
Zhou, Liping
Lau, Wan Yee
Shi, Jie
Cheng, Shuqun
author_sort Sun, Juxian
collection PubMed
description The majority of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Currently, there are only a few therapeutic methods available for patients with advanced HCC and extrahepatic metastasis (EHM). Systemic chemotherapy, such as FOLFOX4 (infusions of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin), has been reported for treating advanced HCC with EHM, but its effectiveness is very poor. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX4 with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) as a palliative treatment for HCC patients with EHM, compared to FOLFOX4 with a placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and subsequently, an exploratory model was developed based on bioinformatics to predict the efficacy of FOLFOX4-ATRA treatment. A total of 108 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either FOLFOX4-ATRA or FOLFOX4-placebo. The intention-to-treat (ITT) population showed a median OS of 16.2 months for the FOLFOX4-ATRA group, compared with 10.7 months for the FOLFOX4-placebo group (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.93; p = 0.025). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months for the FOLFOX4-ATRA group and 4.2 months for the FOLFOX4-placebo group (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41–0.94; p = 0.024). A panel of proteins with unique upregulation during complete response (CR) (SOD3, TTR, SSC5D, GP5, IGKV1D-33) and partial response (PR) (TGFB1, GSS, IGHV5-10-1) effectively predicted CR and PR in patients treated with FOLFOX4-ATRA, as compared to FOLFOX4-placebo. The results suggest that FOLFOX4-ATRA is a safe and effective treatment for patients with advanced HCC and EHM in eastern China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10522582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105225822023-09-28 Combined FOLFOX4 with all-trans retinoic acid versus FOLFOX4 with placebo in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: a randomized, double-blind comparative study Sun, Juxian Mao, Feifei Liu, Chang Zhang, Fan Jiang, Dafeng Guo, Weixing Huo, Lei Zhou, Liping Lau, Wan Yee Shi, Jie Cheng, Shuqun Signal Transduct Target Ther Article The majority of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Currently, there are only a few therapeutic methods available for patients with advanced HCC and extrahepatic metastasis (EHM). Systemic chemotherapy, such as FOLFOX4 (infusions of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin), has been reported for treating advanced HCC with EHM, but its effectiveness is very poor. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX4 with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) as a palliative treatment for HCC patients with EHM, compared to FOLFOX4 with a placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and subsequently, an exploratory model was developed based on bioinformatics to predict the efficacy of FOLFOX4-ATRA treatment. A total of 108 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either FOLFOX4-ATRA or FOLFOX4-placebo. The intention-to-treat (ITT) population showed a median OS of 16.2 months for the FOLFOX4-ATRA group, compared with 10.7 months for the FOLFOX4-placebo group (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.93; p = 0.025). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months for the FOLFOX4-ATRA group and 4.2 months for the FOLFOX4-placebo group (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41–0.94; p = 0.024). A panel of proteins with unique upregulation during complete response (CR) (SOD3, TTR, SSC5D, GP5, IGKV1D-33) and partial response (PR) (TGFB1, GSS, IGHV5-10-1) effectively predicted CR and PR in patients treated with FOLFOX4-ATRA, as compared to FOLFOX4-placebo. The results suggest that FOLFOX4-ATRA is a safe and effective treatment for patients with advanced HCC and EHM in eastern China. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10522582/ /pubmed/37752117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01604-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sun, Juxian
Mao, Feifei
Liu, Chang
Zhang, Fan
Jiang, Dafeng
Guo, Weixing
Huo, Lei
Zhou, Liping
Lau, Wan Yee
Shi, Jie
Cheng, Shuqun
Combined FOLFOX4 with all-trans retinoic acid versus FOLFOX4 with placebo in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: a randomized, double-blind comparative study
title Combined FOLFOX4 with all-trans retinoic acid versus FOLFOX4 with placebo in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: a randomized, double-blind comparative study
title_full Combined FOLFOX4 with all-trans retinoic acid versus FOLFOX4 with placebo in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: a randomized, double-blind comparative study
title_fullStr Combined FOLFOX4 with all-trans retinoic acid versus FOLFOX4 with placebo in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: a randomized, double-blind comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Combined FOLFOX4 with all-trans retinoic acid versus FOLFOX4 with placebo in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: a randomized, double-blind comparative study
title_short Combined FOLFOX4 with all-trans retinoic acid versus FOLFOX4 with placebo in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: a randomized, double-blind comparative study
title_sort combined folfox4 with all-trans retinoic acid versus folfox4 with placebo in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: a randomized, double-blind comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01604-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sunjuxian combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT maofeifei combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT liuchang combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT zhangfan combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT jiangdafeng combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT guoweixing combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT huolei combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT zhouliping combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT lauwanyee combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT shijie combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy
AT chengshuqun combinedfolfox4withalltransretinoicacidversusfolfox4withplacebointreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomawithextrahepaticmetastasisarandomizeddoubleblindcomparativestudy