Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind

We propose the use of the terms natural gene drive (NGD) and engineered gene drive (EGD) arguing against James et al.(1), who think both should be included within the term “gene drive”, based on their mechanistic similarities.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medina, Raul F., Kuzma, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Comment
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41727-3
_version_ 1785110407722041344
author Medina, Raul F.
Kuzma, Jennifer
author_facet Medina, Raul F.
Kuzma, Jennifer
author_sort Medina, Raul F.
collection PubMed
description We propose the use of the terms natural gene drive (NGD) and engineered gene drive (EGD) arguing against James et al.(1), who think both should be included within the term “gene drive”, based on their mechanistic similarities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10522694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105226942023-09-28 Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind Medina, Raul F. Kuzma, Jennifer Nat Commun Comment We propose the use of the terms natural gene drive (NGD) and engineered gene drive (EGD) arguing against James et al.(1), who think both should be included within the term “gene drive”, based on their mechanistic similarities. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10522694/ /pubmed/37752157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41727-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Comment
Medina, Raul F.
Kuzma, Jennifer
Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind
title Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind
title_full Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind
title_fullStr Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind
title_full_unstemmed Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind
title_short Engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind
title_sort engineered and natural gene drives: mechanistically the same, yet not same in kind
topic Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41727-3
work_keys_str_mv AT medinaraulf engineeredandnaturalgenedrivesmechanisticallythesameyetnotsameinkind
AT kuzmajennifer engineeredandnaturalgenedrivesmechanisticallythesameyetnotsameinkind

Ejemplares similares