Cargando…

Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists

We determined if a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning model can accurately segment acute ischemic changes on non-contrast CT compared to neuroradiologists. Non-contrast CT (NCCT) examinations from 232 acute ischemic stroke patients who were enrolled in the DEFUSE 3 trial were included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ostmeier, Sophie, Axelrod, Brian, Verhaaren, Benjamin F. J., Christensen, Soren, Mahammedi, Abdelkader, Liu, Yongkai, Pulli, Benjamin, Li, Li-Jia, Zaharchuk, Greg, Heit, Jeremy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42961-x
_version_ 1785110410662248448
author Ostmeier, Sophie
Axelrod, Brian
Verhaaren, Benjamin F. J.
Christensen, Soren
Mahammedi, Abdelkader
Liu, Yongkai
Pulli, Benjamin
Li, Li-Jia
Zaharchuk, Greg
Heit, Jeremy J.
author_facet Ostmeier, Sophie
Axelrod, Brian
Verhaaren, Benjamin F. J.
Christensen, Soren
Mahammedi, Abdelkader
Liu, Yongkai
Pulli, Benjamin
Li, Li-Jia
Zaharchuk, Greg
Heit, Jeremy J.
author_sort Ostmeier, Sophie
collection PubMed
description We determined if a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning model can accurately segment acute ischemic changes on non-contrast CT compared to neuroradiologists. Non-contrast CT (NCCT) examinations from 232 acute ischemic stroke patients who were enrolled in the DEFUSE 3 trial were included in this study. Three experienced neuroradiologists independently segmented hypodensity that reflected the ischemic core on each scan. The neuroradiologist with the most experience (expert A) served as the ground truth for deep learning model training. Two additional neuroradiologists’ (experts B and C) segmentations were used for data testing. The 232 studies were randomly split into training and test sets. The training set was further randomly divided into 5 folds with training and validation sets. A 3-dimensional CNN architecture was trained and optimized to predict the segmentations of expert A from NCCT. The performance of the model was assessed using a set of volume, overlap, and distance metrics using non-inferiority thresholds of 20%, 3 ml, and 3 mm, respectively. The optimized model trained on expert A was compared to test experts B and C. We used a one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test to test for the non-inferiority of the model-expert compared to the inter-expert agreement. The final model performance for the ischemic core segmentation task reached a performance of 0.46 ± 0.09 Surface Dice at Tolerance 5mm and 0.47 ± 0.13 Dice when trained on expert A. Compared to the two test neuroradiologists the model-expert agreement was non-inferior to the inter-expert agreement, [Formula: see text] . The before, CNN accurately delineates the hypodense ischemic core on NCCT in acute ischemic stroke patients with an accuracy comparable to neuroradiologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10522706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105227062023-09-28 Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists Ostmeier, Sophie Axelrod, Brian Verhaaren, Benjamin F. J. Christensen, Soren Mahammedi, Abdelkader Liu, Yongkai Pulli, Benjamin Li, Li-Jia Zaharchuk, Greg Heit, Jeremy J. Sci Rep Article We determined if a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning model can accurately segment acute ischemic changes on non-contrast CT compared to neuroradiologists. Non-contrast CT (NCCT) examinations from 232 acute ischemic stroke patients who were enrolled in the DEFUSE 3 trial were included in this study. Three experienced neuroradiologists independently segmented hypodensity that reflected the ischemic core on each scan. The neuroradiologist with the most experience (expert A) served as the ground truth for deep learning model training. Two additional neuroradiologists’ (experts B and C) segmentations were used for data testing. The 232 studies were randomly split into training and test sets. The training set was further randomly divided into 5 folds with training and validation sets. A 3-dimensional CNN architecture was trained and optimized to predict the segmentations of expert A from NCCT. The performance of the model was assessed using a set of volume, overlap, and distance metrics using non-inferiority thresholds of 20%, 3 ml, and 3 mm, respectively. The optimized model trained on expert A was compared to test experts B and C. We used a one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test to test for the non-inferiority of the model-expert compared to the inter-expert agreement. The final model performance for the ischemic core segmentation task reached a performance of 0.46 ± 0.09 Surface Dice at Tolerance 5mm and 0.47 ± 0.13 Dice when trained on expert A. Compared to the two test neuroradiologists the model-expert agreement was non-inferior to the inter-expert agreement, [Formula: see text] . The before, CNN accurately delineates the hypodense ischemic core on NCCT in acute ischemic stroke patients with an accuracy comparable to neuroradiologists. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10522706/ /pubmed/37752162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42961-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ostmeier, Sophie
Axelrod, Brian
Verhaaren, Benjamin F. J.
Christensen, Soren
Mahammedi, Abdelkader
Liu, Yongkai
Pulli, Benjamin
Li, Li-Jia
Zaharchuk, Greg
Heit, Jeremy J.
Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists
title Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists
title_full Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists
title_fullStr Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists
title_full_unstemmed Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists
title_short Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists
title_sort non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast ct within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42961-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ostmeiersophie noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists
AT axelrodbrian noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists
AT verhaarenbenjaminfj noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists
AT christensensoren noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists
AT mahammediabdelkader noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists
AT liuyongkai noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists
AT pullibenjamin noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists
AT lilijia noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists
AT zaharchukgreg noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists
AT heitjeremyj noninferiorityofdeeplearningischemicstrokesegmentationonnoncontrastctwithin16hourscomparedtoexpertneuroradiologists