Cargando…

Endoscopic band ligation is safe despite low platelet count and high INR

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is used to prevent variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. The association of thrombocytopenia, high INR (international normalized ratio) and liver dysfunction with the risk of procedure-related bleeding (PRB) remains debated and re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfisterer, Nikolaus, Schwarz, Michael, Jachs, Mathias, Putre, Florian, Ritt, Lukas, Mandorfer, Mattias, Madl, Christian, Trauner, Michael, Reiberger, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-023-10515-y
_version_ 1785110413941145600
author Pfisterer, Nikolaus
Schwarz, Michael
Jachs, Mathias
Putre, Florian
Ritt, Lukas
Mandorfer, Mattias
Madl, Christian
Trauner, Michael
Reiberger, Thomas
author_facet Pfisterer, Nikolaus
Schwarz, Michael
Jachs, Mathias
Putre, Florian
Ritt, Lukas
Mandorfer, Mattias
Madl, Christian
Trauner, Michael
Reiberger, Thomas
author_sort Pfisterer, Nikolaus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prophylactic endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is used to prevent variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. The association of thrombocytopenia, high INR (international normalized ratio) and liver dysfunction with the risk of procedure-related bleeding (PRB) remains debated and recommendations are controversial. METHODS: We analyzed real-life data of cirrhotic patients undergoing elective EBL at two large Viennese centers between Q1/2000–Q1/2018. PRB was defined as bleeding occurring within 30 days after EBL. RESULTS: We included 617 patients undergoing a total of 1178 prophylactic EBL procedures (median 2 per patient). Sixteen (2.6%) of 617 patients experienced PRB after a median of 12.5 (IQR 17.3) days with no difference in characteristics and laboratory values between the two groups. The proportion of patients with platelets (PLT) < 50 G/L or INR ≥ 1.5 was similar in patients with vs. without PRB. A higher MELD showed a non-significant association with EBL-related bleeding risk (odds ratio, OR 1.07; 95% confidence interval 95% CI 1.00–1.16, p = 0.058). While serum bilirubin was a significant predictor for PRB (OR: 1.10; 95% CI 1.03–1.18), the presence of large varices (OR 0.85 vs. small varices; 95% CI 0.20–3.84), INR (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.10–3.14), PLT (OR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00–1.01) and the use of non-selective betablockers (OR 1.20; CI 95% 0.38–3.76) were not associated with PRB. CONCLUSION: EBL is safe and procedure-related bleedings are rare (2.6%) including in patients with thrombocytopenia < 50 G/L or high INR ≥ 1.5. Only high MELD, and especially high bilirubin seem to be linked to an increased risk of EBL-related bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10522720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105227202023-09-28 Endoscopic band ligation is safe despite low platelet count and high INR Pfisterer, Nikolaus Schwarz, Michael Jachs, Mathias Putre, Florian Ritt, Lukas Mandorfer, Mattias Madl, Christian Trauner, Michael Reiberger, Thomas Hepatol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Prophylactic endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is used to prevent variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. The association of thrombocytopenia, high INR (international normalized ratio) and liver dysfunction with the risk of procedure-related bleeding (PRB) remains debated and recommendations are controversial. METHODS: We analyzed real-life data of cirrhotic patients undergoing elective EBL at two large Viennese centers between Q1/2000–Q1/2018. PRB was defined as bleeding occurring within 30 days after EBL. RESULTS: We included 617 patients undergoing a total of 1178 prophylactic EBL procedures (median 2 per patient). Sixteen (2.6%) of 617 patients experienced PRB after a median of 12.5 (IQR 17.3) days with no difference in characteristics and laboratory values between the two groups. The proportion of patients with platelets (PLT) < 50 G/L or INR ≥ 1.5 was similar in patients with vs. without PRB. A higher MELD showed a non-significant association with EBL-related bleeding risk (odds ratio, OR 1.07; 95% confidence interval 95% CI 1.00–1.16, p = 0.058). While serum bilirubin was a significant predictor for PRB (OR: 1.10; 95% CI 1.03–1.18), the presence of large varices (OR 0.85 vs. small varices; 95% CI 0.20–3.84), INR (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.10–3.14), PLT (OR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00–1.01) and the use of non-selective betablockers (OR 1.20; CI 95% 0.38–3.76) were not associated with PRB. CONCLUSION: EBL is safe and procedure-related bleedings are rare (2.6%) including in patients with thrombocytopenia < 50 G/L or high INR ≥ 1.5. Only high MELD, and especially high bilirubin seem to be linked to an increased risk of EBL-related bleeding. Springer India 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10522720/ /pubmed/37024710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-023-10515-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Pfisterer, Nikolaus
Schwarz, Michael
Jachs, Mathias
Putre, Florian
Ritt, Lukas
Mandorfer, Mattias
Madl, Christian
Trauner, Michael
Reiberger, Thomas
Endoscopic band ligation is safe despite low platelet count and high INR
title Endoscopic band ligation is safe despite low platelet count and high INR
title_full Endoscopic band ligation is safe despite low platelet count and high INR
title_fullStr Endoscopic band ligation is safe despite low platelet count and high INR
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic band ligation is safe despite low platelet count and high INR
title_short Endoscopic band ligation is safe despite low platelet count and high INR
title_sort endoscopic band ligation is safe despite low platelet count and high inr
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12072-023-10515-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pfisterernikolaus endoscopicbandligationissafedespitelowplateletcountandhighinr
AT schwarzmichael endoscopicbandligationissafedespitelowplateletcountandhighinr
AT jachsmathias endoscopicbandligationissafedespitelowplateletcountandhighinr
AT putreflorian endoscopicbandligationissafedespitelowplateletcountandhighinr
AT rittlukas endoscopicbandligationissafedespitelowplateletcountandhighinr
AT mandorfermattias endoscopicbandligationissafedespitelowplateletcountandhighinr
AT madlchristian endoscopicbandligationissafedespitelowplateletcountandhighinr
AT traunermichael endoscopicbandligationissafedespitelowplateletcountandhighinr
AT reibergerthomas endoscopicbandligationissafedespitelowplateletcountandhighinr