Cargando…
Measuring context that matters: validation of the modular Tele-QoL patient-reported outcome and experience measure
PURPOSE: A setting-sensitive instrument for assessing Quality of Life (QoL) in Telemedicine (TM) was unavailable. To close this gap, a content-valid “add-on” measure was developed. In parallel, a brief index was derived featuring six items that summarise the main content of the multidimensional asse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37458961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03469-z |
_version_ | 1785110414648934400 |
---|---|
author | Greffin, Klara Muehlan, Holger van den Berg, Neeltje Hoffmann, Wolfgang Ritter, Oliver Oeff, Michael Speerfork, Sven Schomerus, Georg Schmidt, Silke |
author_facet | Greffin, Klara Muehlan, Holger van den Berg, Neeltje Hoffmann, Wolfgang Ritter, Oliver Oeff, Michael Speerfork, Sven Schomerus, Georg Schmidt, Silke |
author_sort | Greffin, Klara |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: A setting-sensitive instrument for assessing Quality of Life (QoL) in Telemedicine (TM) was unavailable. To close this gap, a content-valid “add-on” measure was developed. In parallel, a brief index was derived featuring six items that summarise the main content of the multidimensional assessment. After pre- and pilot-testing, the psychometric performance of the final measures was investigated in an independent validation study. METHODS: The questionnaires were applied along with other standardised instruments of similar concepts as well as associated, yet disparate concepts for validation purposes. The sample consisted of patients with depression or heart failure, with or without TM (n = 200). Data analyses were aimed at calculating descriptive statistics and testing the psychometric performance on item, scale, and instrument level, including different types of validity and reliability. RESULTS: The proposed factor structure of the multidimensional Tele-QoL measure has been confirmed. Reliability coefficients for internal consistency, split-half, and test-retest reliability of the subscales and index reached sufficient values. The Tele-QoL subscales and the index demonstrated Rasch scalability. Validity of both instruments can be assumed. Evidence for discriminant construct validity was provided. Known-groups validity was indicated by respective score differences for various classes of disease severity. CONCLUSION: Both measures show convincing psychometric properties. The final multidimensional Tele-QoL assessment consists of six outcome scales and two impact scales assessing (un-)intended effects of TM on QoL. In addition, the Tele-QoL index provides a short alternative for outcome assessment. The Tele-QoL measures can be used as complementary modules to existing QoL instruments capturing healthcare-related aspects of QoL from the patients’ perspective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-023-03469-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10522723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105227232023-09-28 Measuring context that matters: validation of the modular Tele-QoL patient-reported outcome and experience measure Greffin, Klara Muehlan, Holger van den Berg, Neeltje Hoffmann, Wolfgang Ritter, Oliver Oeff, Michael Speerfork, Sven Schomerus, Georg Schmidt, Silke Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: A setting-sensitive instrument for assessing Quality of Life (QoL) in Telemedicine (TM) was unavailable. To close this gap, a content-valid “add-on” measure was developed. In parallel, a brief index was derived featuring six items that summarise the main content of the multidimensional assessment. After pre- and pilot-testing, the psychometric performance of the final measures was investigated in an independent validation study. METHODS: The questionnaires were applied along with other standardised instruments of similar concepts as well as associated, yet disparate concepts for validation purposes. The sample consisted of patients with depression or heart failure, with or without TM (n = 200). Data analyses were aimed at calculating descriptive statistics and testing the psychometric performance on item, scale, and instrument level, including different types of validity and reliability. RESULTS: The proposed factor structure of the multidimensional Tele-QoL measure has been confirmed. Reliability coefficients for internal consistency, split-half, and test-retest reliability of the subscales and index reached sufficient values. The Tele-QoL subscales and the index demonstrated Rasch scalability. Validity of both instruments can be assumed. Evidence for discriminant construct validity was provided. Known-groups validity was indicated by respective score differences for various classes of disease severity. CONCLUSION: Both measures show convincing psychometric properties. The final multidimensional Tele-QoL assessment consists of six outcome scales and two impact scales assessing (un-)intended effects of TM on QoL. In addition, the Tele-QoL index provides a short alternative for outcome assessment. The Tele-QoL measures can be used as complementary modules to existing QoL instruments capturing healthcare-related aspects of QoL from the patients’ perspective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-023-03469-z. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10522723/ /pubmed/37458961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03469-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Greffin, Klara Muehlan, Holger van den Berg, Neeltje Hoffmann, Wolfgang Ritter, Oliver Oeff, Michael Speerfork, Sven Schomerus, Georg Schmidt, Silke Measuring context that matters: validation of the modular Tele-QoL patient-reported outcome and experience measure |
title | Measuring context that matters: validation of the modular Tele-QoL patient-reported outcome and experience measure |
title_full | Measuring context that matters: validation of the modular Tele-QoL patient-reported outcome and experience measure |
title_fullStr | Measuring context that matters: validation of the modular Tele-QoL patient-reported outcome and experience measure |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring context that matters: validation of the modular Tele-QoL patient-reported outcome and experience measure |
title_short | Measuring context that matters: validation of the modular Tele-QoL patient-reported outcome and experience measure |
title_sort | measuring context that matters: validation of the modular tele-qol patient-reported outcome and experience measure |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37458961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03469-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greffinklara measuringcontextthatmattersvalidationofthemodularteleqolpatientreportedoutcomeandexperiencemeasure AT muehlanholger measuringcontextthatmattersvalidationofthemodularteleqolpatientreportedoutcomeandexperiencemeasure AT vandenbergneeltje measuringcontextthatmattersvalidationofthemodularteleqolpatientreportedoutcomeandexperiencemeasure AT hoffmannwolfgang measuringcontextthatmattersvalidationofthemodularteleqolpatientreportedoutcomeandexperiencemeasure AT ritteroliver measuringcontextthatmattersvalidationofthemodularteleqolpatientreportedoutcomeandexperiencemeasure AT oeffmichael measuringcontextthatmattersvalidationofthemodularteleqolpatientreportedoutcomeandexperiencemeasure AT speerforksven measuringcontextthatmattersvalidationofthemodularteleqolpatientreportedoutcomeandexperiencemeasure AT schomerusgeorg measuringcontextthatmattersvalidationofthemodularteleqolpatientreportedoutcomeandexperiencemeasure AT schmidtsilke measuringcontextthatmattersvalidationofthemodularteleqolpatientreportedoutcomeandexperiencemeasure |