Cargando…

Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Survivors of lung cancer and their partners often have complex unresolved physical, psychosocial, and behavioral needs that can negatively affect the survivors’ and partners’ well-being. This systematic review aimed to (1) examine the content and delivery of mindfulness-based interventio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonnell, Karen Kane, Owens, Otis L., Umari, Fattona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3
_version_ 1785110415802368000
author McDonnell, Karen Kane
Owens, Otis L.
Umari, Fattona
author_facet McDonnell, Karen Kane
Owens, Otis L.
Umari, Fattona
author_sort McDonnell, Karen Kane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Survivors of lung cancer and their partners often have complex unresolved physical, psychosocial, and behavioral needs that can negatively affect the survivors’ and partners’ well-being. This systematic review aimed to (1) examine the content and delivery of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and (2) summarize and synthesize the current evidence for effectiveness of MBIs targeting survivors of lung cancer and/or one selected partner (dyads). METHOD: Six databases were searched for interventional studies published in English between 1980 and June 2020 using three terms (lung neoplasms, mindfulness, caregivers). For outcome measures, the interventions focused on behavioral change (meditation, yoga, stretching, breathing), symptom management (dyspnea, fatigue, sleep disruption, anxiety, depression, stress reduction), and knowledge. Two reviewers independently assessed article eligibility. One reviewer performed and another independently verified data extraction. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used to critically appraise RCTs. RESULTS: Searching yielded 307 records, of which 64 were assessed for eligibility. Six studies investigated the impact of an MBI on survivors and partners. Four studies were single-arm feasibility studies; two were RCTs. Two feasibility studies and one RCT recruited romantic couples whereas the others recruited asymmetrical dyads. The single-arm studies reported strong feasibility and acceptability. RCTs reported significant outcomes for reduced cancer-related distress and depression, and improved QOL, self-compassion, mindfulness skills, and rumination. CONCLUSION: Dyadic intervention research is a growing field. Few interventions target individuals with lung cancer and their partners. No interventions target partners alone. Future research should evaluate rigorous methodologies that enhance the understanding of independent and interdependent health-related effects within dyads and across relationships and settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10522728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105227282023-09-28 Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review McDonnell, Karen Kane Owens, Otis L. Umari, Fattona Int J Behav Med Full Length Manuscript BACKGROUND: Survivors of lung cancer and their partners often have complex unresolved physical, psychosocial, and behavioral needs that can negatively affect the survivors’ and partners’ well-being. This systematic review aimed to (1) examine the content and delivery of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and (2) summarize and synthesize the current evidence for effectiveness of MBIs targeting survivors of lung cancer and/or one selected partner (dyads). METHOD: Six databases were searched for interventional studies published in English between 1980 and June 2020 using three terms (lung neoplasms, mindfulness, caregivers). For outcome measures, the interventions focused on behavioral change (meditation, yoga, stretching, breathing), symptom management (dyspnea, fatigue, sleep disruption, anxiety, depression, stress reduction), and knowledge. Two reviewers independently assessed article eligibility. One reviewer performed and another independently verified data extraction. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used to critically appraise RCTs. RESULTS: Searching yielded 307 records, of which 64 were assessed for eligibility. Six studies investigated the impact of an MBI on survivors and partners. Four studies were single-arm feasibility studies; two were RCTs. Two feasibility studies and one RCT recruited romantic couples whereas the others recruited asymmetrical dyads. The single-arm studies reported strong feasibility and acceptability. RCTs reported significant outcomes for reduced cancer-related distress and depression, and improved QOL, self-compassion, mindfulness skills, and rumination. CONCLUSION: Dyadic intervention research is a growing field. Few interventions target individuals with lung cancer and their partners. No interventions target partners alone. Future research should evaluate rigorous methodologies that enhance the understanding of independent and interdependent health-related effects within dyads and across relationships and settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3. Springer US 2022-10-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10522728/ /pubmed/36224314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Full Length Manuscript
McDonnell, Karen Kane
Owens, Otis L.
Umari, Fattona
Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review
title Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review
title_full Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review
title_short Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review
title_sort mindfulness-based interventions for survivors of lung cancer and their partners: a systematic review
topic Full Length Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonnellkarenkane mindfulnessbasedinterventionsforsurvivorsoflungcancerandtheirpartnersasystematicreview
AT owensotisl mindfulnessbasedinterventionsforsurvivorsoflungcancerandtheirpartnersasystematicreview
AT umarifattona mindfulnessbasedinterventionsforsurvivorsoflungcancerandtheirpartnersasystematicreview