Cargando…
Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Survivors of lung cancer and their partners often have complex unresolved physical, psychosocial, and behavioral needs that can negatively affect the survivors’ and partners’ well-being. This systematic review aimed to (1) examine the content and delivery of mindfulness-based interventio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3 |
_version_ | 1785110415802368000 |
---|---|
author | McDonnell, Karen Kane Owens, Otis L. Umari, Fattona |
author_facet | McDonnell, Karen Kane Owens, Otis L. Umari, Fattona |
author_sort | McDonnell, Karen Kane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Survivors of lung cancer and their partners often have complex unresolved physical, psychosocial, and behavioral needs that can negatively affect the survivors’ and partners’ well-being. This systematic review aimed to (1) examine the content and delivery of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and (2) summarize and synthesize the current evidence for effectiveness of MBIs targeting survivors of lung cancer and/or one selected partner (dyads). METHOD: Six databases were searched for interventional studies published in English between 1980 and June 2020 using three terms (lung neoplasms, mindfulness, caregivers). For outcome measures, the interventions focused on behavioral change (meditation, yoga, stretching, breathing), symptom management (dyspnea, fatigue, sleep disruption, anxiety, depression, stress reduction), and knowledge. Two reviewers independently assessed article eligibility. One reviewer performed and another independently verified data extraction. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used to critically appraise RCTs. RESULTS: Searching yielded 307 records, of which 64 were assessed for eligibility. Six studies investigated the impact of an MBI on survivors and partners. Four studies were single-arm feasibility studies; two were RCTs. Two feasibility studies and one RCT recruited romantic couples whereas the others recruited asymmetrical dyads. The single-arm studies reported strong feasibility and acceptability. RCTs reported significant outcomes for reduced cancer-related distress and depression, and improved QOL, self-compassion, mindfulness skills, and rumination. CONCLUSION: Dyadic intervention research is a growing field. Few interventions target individuals with lung cancer and their partners. No interventions target partners alone. Future research should evaluate rigorous methodologies that enhance the understanding of independent and interdependent health-related effects within dyads and across relationships and settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10522728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105227282023-09-28 Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review McDonnell, Karen Kane Owens, Otis L. Umari, Fattona Int J Behav Med Full Length Manuscript BACKGROUND: Survivors of lung cancer and their partners often have complex unresolved physical, psychosocial, and behavioral needs that can negatively affect the survivors’ and partners’ well-being. This systematic review aimed to (1) examine the content and delivery of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and (2) summarize and synthesize the current evidence for effectiveness of MBIs targeting survivors of lung cancer and/or one selected partner (dyads). METHOD: Six databases were searched for interventional studies published in English between 1980 and June 2020 using three terms (lung neoplasms, mindfulness, caregivers). For outcome measures, the interventions focused on behavioral change (meditation, yoga, stretching, breathing), symptom management (dyspnea, fatigue, sleep disruption, anxiety, depression, stress reduction), and knowledge. Two reviewers independently assessed article eligibility. One reviewer performed and another independently verified data extraction. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used to critically appraise RCTs. RESULTS: Searching yielded 307 records, of which 64 were assessed for eligibility. Six studies investigated the impact of an MBI on survivors and partners. Four studies were single-arm feasibility studies; two were RCTs. Two feasibility studies and one RCT recruited romantic couples whereas the others recruited asymmetrical dyads. The single-arm studies reported strong feasibility and acceptability. RCTs reported significant outcomes for reduced cancer-related distress and depression, and improved QOL, self-compassion, mindfulness skills, and rumination. CONCLUSION: Dyadic intervention research is a growing field. Few interventions target individuals with lung cancer and their partners. No interventions target partners alone. Future research should evaluate rigorous methodologies that enhance the understanding of independent and interdependent health-related effects within dyads and across relationships and settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3. Springer US 2022-10-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10522728/ /pubmed/36224314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Full Length Manuscript McDonnell, Karen Kane Owens, Otis L. Umari, Fattona Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review |
title | Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Partners: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | mindfulness-based interventions for survivors of lung cancer and their partners: a systematic review |
topic | Full Length Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10132-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcdonnellkarenkane mindfulnessbasedinterventionsforsurvivorsoflungcancerandtheirpartnersasystematicreview AT owensotisl mindfulnessbasedinterventionsforsurvivorsoflungcancerandtheirpartnersasystematicreview AT umarifattona mindfulnessbasedinterventionsforsurvivorsoflungcancerandtheirpartnersasystematicreview |