Cargando…

Plasma activated water as a pre-treatment strategy in the context of biofilm-infected chronic wounds

Healing and treatment of chronic wounds are often complicated due to biofilm formation by pathogens. Here, the efficacy of plasma activated water (PAW) as a pre-treatment strategy has been investigated prior to the application of topical antiseptics polyhexamethylene biguanide, povidone iodine, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vyas, Heema K.N., Xia, Binbin, Alam, David, Gracie, Nicholas P., Rothwell, Joanna G., Rice, Scott A., Carter, Dee, Cullen, Patrick J., Mai-Prochnow, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37771391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100154
_version_ 1785110461267574784
author Vyas, Heema K.N.
Xia, Binbin
Alam, David
Gracie, Nicholas P.
Rothwell, Joanna G.
Rice, Scott A.
Carter, Dee
Cullen, Patrick J.
Mai-Prochnow, Anne
author_facet Vyas, Heema K.N.
Xia, Binbin
Alam, David
Gracie, Nicholas P.
Rothwell, Joanna G.
Rice, Scott A.
Carter, Dee
Cullen, Patrick J.
Mai-Prochnow, Anne
author_sort Vyas, Heema K.N.
collection PubMed
description Healing and treatment of chronic wounds are often complicated due to biofilm formation by pathogens. Here, the efficacy of plasma activated water (PAW) as a pre-treatment strategy has been investigated prior to the application of topical antiseptics polyhexamethylene biguanide, povidone iodine, and MediHoney, which are routinely used to treat chronic wounds. The efficacy of this treatment strategy was determined against biofilms of Escherichia coli formed on a plastic substratum and on a human keratinocyte monolayer substratum used as an in vitro biofilm-skin epithelial cell model. PAW pre-treatment greatly increased the killing efficacy of all the three antiseptics to eradicate the E. coli biofilms formed on the plastic and keratinocyte substrates. However, the efficacy of the combined PAW-antiseptic treatment and single treatments using PAW or antiseptic alone was lower for biofilms formed in the in vitro biofilm-skin epithelial cell model compared to the plastic substratum. Scavenging assays demonstrated that reactive species present within the PAW were largely responsible for its anti-biofilm activity. PAW treatment resulted in significant intracellular reactive oxygen and nitrogen species accumulation within the E. coli biofilms, while also rapidly acting on the microbial membrane leading to outer membrane permeabilisation and depolarisation. Together, these factors contribute to significant cell death, potentiating the antibacterial effect of the assessed antiseptics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10522953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105229532023-09-28 Plasma activated water as a pre-treatment strategy in the context of biofilm-infected chronic wounds Vyas, Heema K.N. Xia, Binbin Alam, David Gracie, Nicholas P. Rothwell, Joanna G. Rice, Scott A. Carter, Dee Cullen, Patrick J. Mai-Prochnow, Anne Biofilm Article Healing and treatment of chronic wounds are often complicated due to biofilm formation by pathogens. Here, the efficacy of plasma activated water (PAW) as a pre-treatment strategy has been investigated prior to the application of topical antiseptics polyhexamethylene biguanide, povidone iodine, and MediHoney, which are routinely used to treat chronic wounds. The efficacy of this treatment strategy was determined against biofilms of Escherichia coli formed on a plastic substratum and on a human keratinocyte monolayer substratum used as an in vitro biofilm-skin epithelial cell model. PAW pre-treatment greatly increased the killing efficacy of all the three antiseptics to eradicate the E. coli biofilms formed on the plastic and keratinocyte substrates. However, the efficacy of the combined PAW-antiseptic treatment and single treatments using PAW or antiseptic alone was lower for biofilms formed in the in vitro biofilm-skin epithelial cell model compared to the plastic substratum. Scavenging assays demonstrated that reactive species present within the PAW were largely responsible for its anti-biofilm activity. PAW treatment resulted in significant intracellular reactive oxygen and nitrogen species accumulation within the E. coli biofilms, while also rapidly acting on the microbial membrane leading to outer membrane permeabilisation and depolarisation. Together, these factors contribute to significant cell death, potentiating the antibacterial effect of the assessed antiseptics. Elsevier 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10522953/ /pubmed/37771391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100154 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vyas, Heema K.N.
Xia, Binbin
Alam, David
Gracie, Nicholas P.
Rothwell, Joanna G.
Rice, Scott A.
Carter, Dee
Cullen, Patrick J.
Mai-Prochnow, Anne
Plasma activated water as a pre-treatment strategy in the context of biofilm-infected chronic wounds
title Plasma activated water as a pre-treatment strategy in the context of biofilm-infected chronic wounds
title_full Plasma activated water as a pre-treatment strategy in the context of biofilm-infected chronic wounds
title_fullStr Plasma activated water as a pre-treatment strategy in the context of biofilm-infected chronic wounds
title_full_unstemmed Plasma activated water as a pre-treatment strategy in the context of biofilm-infected chronic wounds
title_short Plasma activated water as a pre-treatment strategy in the context of biofilm-infected chronic wounds
title_sort plasma activated water as a pre-treatment strategy in the context of biofilm-infected chronic wounds
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37771391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioflm.2023.100154
work_keys_str_mv AT vyasheemakn plasmaactivatedwaterasapretreatmentstrategyinthecontextofbiofilminfectedchronicwounds
AT xiabinbin plasmaactivatedwaterasapretreatmentstrategyinthecontextofbiofilminfectedchronicwounds
AT alamdavid plasmaactivatedwaterasapretreatmentstrategyinthecontextofbiofilminfectedchronicwounds
AT gracienicholasp plasmaactivatedwaterasapretreatmentstrategyinthecontextofbiofilminfectedchronicwounds
AT rothwelljoannag plasmaactivatedwaterasapretreatmentstrategyinthecontextofbiofilminfectedchronicwounds
AT ricescotta plasmaactivatedwaterasapretreatmentstrategyinthecontextofbiofilminfectedchronicwounds
AT carterdee plasmaactivatedwaterasapretreatmentstrategyinthecontextofbiofilminfectedchronicwounds
AT cullenpatrickj plasmaactivatedwaterasapretreatmentstrategyinthecontextofbiofilminfectedchronicwounds
AT maiprochnowanne plasmaactivatedwaterasapretreatmentstrategyinthecontextofbiofilminfectedchronicwounds