Cargando…

Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the ultrasound scan frequency and rate of congenital malformations between urban and rural areas. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a population-based retrospective study using linked data from administrative data sources and register data. All singleton live births...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zile-Velika, Irisa, Ebela, Inguna, Folkmanis, Valdis, Rumba-Rozenfelde, Ingrida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37771958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100242
_version_ 1785110464331513856
author Zile-Velika, Irisa
Ebela, Inguna
Folkmanis, Valdis
Rumba-Rozenfelde, Ingrida
author_facet Zile-Velika, Irisa
Ebela, Inguna
Folkmanis, Valdis
Rumba-Rozenfelde, Ingrida
author_sort Zile-Velika, Irisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the ultrasound scan frequency and rate of congenital malformations between urban and rural areas. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a population-based retrospective study using linked data from administrative data sources and register data. All singleton live births in 2018 that could be linked (n = 18,759) were included in the data analysis. Place of residence was categorized into three groups: Riga (capital city), other big cities and rural areas (including regional cities). Adjusted ORs were calculated. The multiple regression model was adjusted for maternal age, living area and prenatal screenings. RESULTS: Overall, 3% (n = 536) of the live-born infants were reported to have congenital malformations at birth. The proportion of congenital anomalies was, on average, 2% higher (p < 0.001) in Riga (4%, n = 334) than in the rural regions (2%, n = 93) and other cities (1%, n = 109). Women whose infants had congenital anomalies at birth had higher and statistically significant odds of having abnormal findings on ultrasound (US) screening (OR=2.3; 95% CI 1.5–3.4; p < 0.001) and undergoing invasive diagnostic tests during pregnancy (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.4–3.5; p < 0.001). The median number of ultrasound scans during pregnancy was 3 (IQR 2) in Riga and 4 (IQR 2) in the other cities and rural regions. The top 3 types of congenital anomalies at birth were deformations of the musculoskeletal system and congenital malformations of the circulatory system and genital organs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study showed a statistically significant association between the rate of foetal anomalies and the frequency of prenatal examinations. A higher average number of US examinations per pregnancy was observed in the rural regions. Regional variations exist in the rates of specific congenital anomalies. Further studies are recommended in this field for better understanding. Surveillance systems that are able to analyse the efficiency of US examinations need to be developed for the early prenatal detection of congenital anomalies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10522966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105229662023-09-28 Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia Zile-Velika, Irisa Ebela, Inguna Folkmanis, Valdis Rumba-Rozenfelde, Ingrida Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Review OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the ultrasound scan frequency and rate of congenital malformations between urban and rural areas. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a population-based retrospective study using linked data from administrative data sources and register data. All singleton live births in 2018 that could be linked (n = 18,759) were included in the data analysis. Place of residence was categorized into three groups: Riga (capital city), other big cities and rural areas (including regional cities). Adjusted ORs were calculated. The multiple regression model was adjusted for maternal age, living area and prenatal screenings. RESULTS: Overall, 3% (n = 536) of the live-born infants were reported to have congenital malformations at birth. The proportion of congenital anomalies was, on average, 2% higher (p < 0.001) in Riga (4%, n = 334) than in the rural regions (2%, n = 93) and other cities (1%, n = 109). Women whose infants had congenital anomalies at birth had higher and statistically significant odds of having abnormal findings on ultrasound (US) screening (OR=2.3; 95% CI 1.5–3.4; p < 0.001) and undergoing invasive diagnostic tests during pregnancy (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.4–3.5; p < 0.001). The median number of ultrasound scans during pregnancy was 3 (IQR 2) in Riga and 4 (IQR 2) in the other cities and rural regions. The top 3 types of congenital anomalies at birth were deformations of the musculoskeletal system and congenital malformations of the circulatory system and genital organs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study showed a statistically significant association between the rate of foetal anomalies and the frequency of prenatal examinations. A higher average number of US examinations per pregnancy was observed in the rural regions. Regional variations exist in the rates of specific congenital anomalies. Further studies are recommended in this field for better understanding. Surveillance systems that are able to analyse the efficiency of US examinations need to be developed for the early prenatal detection of congenital anomalies. Elsevier 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10522966/ /pubmed/37771958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100242 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Zile-Velika, Irisa
Ebela, Inguna
Folkmanis, Valdis
Rumba-Rozenfelde, Ingrida
Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia
title Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia
title_full Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia
title_fullStr Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia
title_full_unstemmed Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia
title_short Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia
title_sort prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: pattern and distribution in latvia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37771958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100242
work_keys_str_mv AT zilevelikairisa prenatalultrasoundscreeningandcongenitalanomaliesatbirthbyregionpatternanddistributioninlatvia
AT ebelainguna prenatalultrasoundscreeningandcongenitalanomaliesatbirthbyregionpatternanddistributioninlatvia
AT folkmanisvaldis prenatalultrasoundscreeningandcongenitalanomaliesatbirthbyregionpatternanddistributioninlatvia
AT rumbarozenfeldeingrida prenatalultrasoundscreeningandcongenitalanomaliesatbirthbyregionpatternanddistributioninlatvia