Cargando…

Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions

BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique increasingly used for plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in patients with severe calcification and peripheral artery disease. However, much of the available literature on IVL is focused on its use in coronary arteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umeh, Chukwuemeka Anthony, Stratton, Ashley, Wagner, Tifani, Saigal, Shipra, Sood, Krystal, Dhawan, Raghav, Wagner, Cory, Obi, Jessica, Kumar, Sabina, Ching, Tsung Han Scottie, Gupta, Rahul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37771339
http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i8.395
_version_ 1785110513606197248
author Umeh, Chukwuemeka Anthony
Stratton, Ashley
Wagner, Tifani
Saigal, Shipra
Sood, Krystal
Dhawan, Raghav
Wagner, Cory
Obi, Jessica
Kumar, Sabina
Ching, Tsung Han Scottie
Gupta, Rahul
author_facet Umeh, Chukwuemeka Anthony
Stratton, Ashley
Wagner, Tifani
Saigal, Shipra
Sood, Krystal
Dhawan, Raghav
Wagner, Cory
Obi, Jessica
Kumar, Sabina
Ching, Tsung Han Scottie
Gupta, Rahul
author_sort Umeh, Chukwuemeka Anthony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique increasingly used for plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in patients with severe calcification and peripheral artery disease. However, much of the available literature on IVL is focused on its use in coronary arteries, with relatively limited data on non-coronary artery use. AIM: To analyze the safety and efficacy of current IVL use in non-coronary artery lesions, as reported in case reports and case series. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Reference Citation Analysis databases for case reports and case series on IVL use in peripheral artery disease. We then extracted variables of interest and calculated the mean and proportions of these variables. RESULTS: We included 60 patients from 33 case reports/case series. Ninety-eight percent of the cases had IVL usage in only one blood vessel, while four had the IVL used in two vessels (2.0%), resulting in 64 Lesions treated with IVL. The mean age of the patients was 73.7 (SD 10.9). IVL was successfully used in severe iliofemoral artery stenosis (51.6%), severe innominate, subclavian, and carotid artery stenosis (26.7% combined), and severe mesenteric vessel stenosis (9.4%). Additionally, IVL was successfully used in severe renal (7.8%) and aortic artery (4.7%) stenosis. There were complications in 12% of the cases, with dissection being the commonest. CONCLUSION: IVL has successfully used in plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in severely calcified and challenging lesions in the iliofemoral, carotid, subclavian, aorta, renal, and mesenteric vessels. The most severe but transient complications were with IVL use in the aortic arch and neck arteries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10523193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105231932023-09-28 Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions Umeh, Chukwuemeka Anthony Stratton, Ashley Wagner, Tifani Saigal, Shipra Sood, Krystal Dhawan, Raghav Wagner, Cory Obi, Jessica Kumar, Sabina Ching, Tsung Han Scottie Gupta, Rahul World J Cardiol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique increasingly used for plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in patients with severe calcification and peripheral artery disease. However, much of the available literature on IVL is focused on its use in coronary arteries, with relatively limited data on non-coronary artery use. AIM: To analyze the safety and efficacy of current IVL use in non-coronary artery lesions, as reported in case reports and case series. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Reference Citation Analysis databases for case reports and case series on IVL use in peripheral artery disease. We then extracted variables of interest and calculated the mean and proportions of these variables. RESULTS: We included 60 patients from 33 case reports/case series. Ninety-eight percent of the cases had IVL usage in only one blood vessel, while four had the IVL used in two vessels (2.0%), resulting in 64 Lesions treated with IVL. The mean age of the patients was 73.7 (SD 10.9). IVL was successfully used in severe iliofemoral artery stenosis (51.6%), severe innominate, subclavian, and carotid artery stenosis (26.7% combined), and severe mesenteric vessel stenosis (9.4%). Additionally, IVL was successfully used in severe renal (7.8%) and aortic artery (4.7%) stenosis. There were complications in 12% of the cases, with dissection being the commonest. CONCLUSION: IVL has successfully used in plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in severely calcified and challenging lesions in the iliofemoral, carotid, subclavian, aorta, renal, and mesenteric vessels. The most severe but transient complications were with IVL use in the aortic arch and neck arteries. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-08-26 2023-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10523193/ /pubmed/37771339 http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i8.395 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Umeh, Chukwuemeka Anthony
Stratton, Ashley
Wagner, Tifani
Saigal, Shipra
Sood, Krystal
Dhawan, Raghav
Wagner, Cory
Obi, Jessica
Kumar, Sabina
Ching, Tsung Han Scottie
Gupta, Rahul
Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions
title Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions
title_full Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions
title_fullStr Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions
title_full_unstemmed Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions
title_short Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions
title_sort use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37771339
http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i8.395
work_keys_str_mv AT umehchukwuemekaanthony useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT strattonashley useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT wagnertifani useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT saigalshipra useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT soodkrystal useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT dhawanraghav useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT wagnercory useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT obijessica useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT kumarsabina useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT chingtsunghanscottie useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions
AT guptarahul useofintravascularlithotripsyinnoncoronaryarterylesions