Cargando…

Predictive value of DNA methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. Drug resistance in chemotherapy often occurs in patients with GC, leading to tumor recurrence and poor survival. DNA methylation is closely related to the development of cancer. METHODS: To investigate the role...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ye, Mo, Ning, Yang, Dong, Lin, QiuLu, Huang, WenFeng, Wang, Rensheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37771430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1238310
_version_ 1785110589873324032
author Li, Ye
Mo, Ning
Yang, Dong
Lin, QiuLu
Huang, WenFeng
Wang, Rensheng
author_facet Li, Ye
Mo, Ning
Yang, Dong
Lin, QiuLu
Huang, WenFeng
Wang, Rensheng
author_sort Li, Ye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. Drug resistance in chemotherapy often occurs in patients with GC, leading to tumor recurrence and poor survival. DNA methylation is closely related to the development of cancer. METHODS: To investigate the role of DNA methylation in chemotherapy resistance in GC patients, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using DNA methylation data and survival information obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Univariate Cox analysis was performed to screen for differential DNA methylation of chemotherapy response in patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox analysis was then performed to identify the independent prognostic genes. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were used to explore the biological function of the signature genes. RESULTS: Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for GC survived longer. 308 differentially methylated genes were demonstrated to be associated with prognosis. Six genes were optimally chosed for establisehing the risk model, including C6orf222, CCNL1, CREBZF, GCKR, TFCP2, and VIPR2. It was constructed based on the DNA methylation levels of these six genes: risk score = 0.47123374*C6orf222 + 9.53554803*CCNL1 + 10.40234138* CREBZF + 0.07611856* GCKR + 18.87661557*TFCP2 − 0.46396254* VIPR2. According to the risk score, patients receiving chemotherapy were divided into high- and low-risk groups, and the prognosis of the two groups was compared. The high-risk group had a shorter survival; however, this association was not present in patients without chemotherapy. The accuracy and predictive efficacy of the risk score in predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of patients was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve. In patients receiving chemotherapy, the area under the curve of the risk score for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 0.841, 0.72, and 0.734, respectively. In patients who did not receive chemotherapy, the area under the curve was 0.406, 0.585, and 0.585, respectively. A nomogram model was constructed based on the risk score and clinical indicators. The model showed good consistency in the predicted probabilities and actual probabilities. Gene Ontology functional enrichment of these candidate methylated genes showed the following molecular functions: RNA binding, protein binding, mRNA binding, and nucleic acid binding; that they were mediated mainly through the following cell components: nuclear speck, nucleoplasm, nucleus, catalytic step 2 spliceosome, and the transcription factor AP-1 complex; and that they were involved in the following biological processes: mRNA processing, mRNA splicing, and RNA polymerase II promoter transcription. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment results revealed that the signaling pathways mainly enriched were transcriptional misregulation in cancer, spliceosome, and the IL-17 signaling pathway. CONCLUSION: Our work identifies a six DNA methylated expression signature as a promising biomarker of chemo-resistance in GC, which provides new insights into the development of new strategies to overcome chemo-resistance in GC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10523571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105235712023-09-28 Predictive value of DNA methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer Li, Ye Mo, Ning Yang, Dong Lin, QiuLu Huang, WenFeng Wang, Rensheng Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. Drug resistance in chemotherapy often occurs in patients with GC, leading to tumor recurrence and poor survival. DNA methylation is closely related to the development of cancer. METHODS: To investigate the role of DNA methylation in chemotherapy resistance in GC patients, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using DNA methylation data and survival information obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Univariate Cox analysis was performed to screen for differential DNA methylation of chemotherapy response in patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox analysis was then performed to identify the independent prognostic genes. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were used to explore the biological function of the signature genes. RESULTS: Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for GC survived longer. 308 differentially methylated genes were demonstrated to be associated with prognosis. Six genes were optimally chosed for establisehing the risk model, including C6orf222, CCNL1, CREBZF, GCKR, TFCP2, and VIPR2. It was constructed based on the DNA methylation levels of these six genes: risk score = 0.47123374*C6orf222 + 9.53554803*CCNL1 + 10.40234138* CREBZF + 0.07611856* GCKR + 18.87661557*TFCP2 − 0.46396254* VIPR2. According to the risk score, patients receiving chemotherapy were divided into high- and low-risk groups, and the prognosis of the two groups was compared. The high-risk group had a shorter survival; however, this association was not present in patients without chemotherapy. The accuracy and predictive efficacy of the risk score in predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of patients was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve. In patients receiving chemotherapy, the area under the curve of the risk score for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 0.841, 0.72, and 0.734, respectively. In patients who did not receive chemotherapy, the area under the curve was 0.406, 0.585, and 0.585, respectively. A nomogram model was constructed based on the risk score and clinical indicators. The model showed good consistency in the predicted probabilities and actual probabilities. Gene Ontology functional enrichment of these candidate methylated genes showed the following molecular functions: RNA binding, protein binding, mRNA binding, and nucleic acid binding; that they were mediated mainly through the following cell components: nuclear speck, nucleoplasm, nucleus, catalytic step 2 spliceosome, and the transcription factor AP-1 complex; and that they were involved in the following biological processes: mRNA processing, mRNA splicing, and RNA polymerase II promoter transcription. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment results revealed that the signaling pathways mainly enriched were transcriptional misregulation in cancer, spliceosome, and the IL-17 signaling pathway. CONCLUSION: Our work identifies a six DNA methylated expression signature as a promising biomarker of chemo-resistance in GC, which provides new insights into the development of new strategies to overcome chemo-resistance in GC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10523571/ /pubmed/37771430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1238310 Text en Copyright © 2023 Li, Mo, Yang, Lin, Huang and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Li, Ye
Mo, Ning
Yang, Dong
Lin, QiuLu
Huang, WenFeng
Wang, Rensheng
Predictive value of DNA methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer
title Predictive value of DNA methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer
title_full Predictive value of DNA methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer
title_fullStr Predictive value of DNA methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Predictive value of DNA methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer
title_short Predictive value of DNA methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer
title_sort predictive value of dna methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37771430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1238310
work_keys_str_mv AT liye predictivevalueofdnamethylationintheefficacyofchemotherapyforgastriccancer
AT moning predictivevalueofdnamethylationintheefficacyofchemotherapyforgastriccancer
AT yangdong predictivevalueofdnamethylationintheefficacyofchemotherapyforgastriccancer
AT linqiulu predictivevalueofdnamethylationintheefficacyofchemotherapyforgastriccancer
AT huangwenfeng predictivevalueofdnamethylationintheefficacyofchemotherapyforgastriccancer
AT wangrensheng predictivevalueofdnamethylationintheefficacyofchemotherapyforgastriccancer