Cargando…

Measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among a heterogeneous German-speaking sample

BACKROUND: Dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs (DIBs) are a key symptom domain in numerous mental disorders. Because DIBs exert a strong influence on social experience and behavior, they play an important role in a mental disorder's development and progression. To date, only the Interpersonal C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirchner, Lukas, Kloft, Matthias, Arias Martín, Beatriz, Berg, Max, Anjedanimoghadamaraghi, Paria, Schäfer, Leonora, Rief, Winfried
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05155-3
_version_ 1785110616868913152
author Kirchner, Lukas
Kloft, Matthias
Arias Martín, Beatriz
Berg, Max
Anjedanimoghadamaraghi, Paria
Schäfer, Leonora
Rief, Winfried
author_facet Kirchner, Lukas
Kloft, Matthias
Arias Martín, Beatriz
Berg, Max
Anjedanimoghadamaraghi, Paria
Schäfer, Leonora
Rief, Winfried
author_sort Kirchner, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKROUND: Dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs (DIBs) are a key symptom domain in numerous mental disorders. Because DIBs exert a strong influence on social experience and behavior, they play an important role in a mental disorder's development and progression. To date, only the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale (ICDS) captures DIBs independently of specific disorders, populations, or contexts. The present study's aim was to psychometrically evaluate and validate a German translation of the ICDS. METHODS: The ICDS was administered along with indicators of convergent (rejection sensitivity, depressive expectations, interpersonal trust, interpersonal problems, perceived social support), discriminant (self-efficacy, perseverative negative thinking, optimism), and clinical validity (psychopathology, perceived stress, well-being) to a pooled sample incorporating non-clinical (N = 114) and clinical (N = 94) participants. RESULTS: An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) suggested a five-factor solution (factor loadings: .44 to .85). Correlational analyses demonstrated acceptable convergent (ρ = -.29 to -.35, ρ = .27 to .59), suboptimal discriminant (ρ = -.27 to -.38, ρ = .52), and acceptable clinical validity (ρ = -.21, ρ = .36 to .44) at the total-scale level. However, results at the subscale level were mixed and required nuanced interpretation. Likewise, internal consistency was acceptable at the total-scale level (α = .76), but ranged from good to poor at the subscale level (α = .61 to .80). DIBs mediated the negative relationship between mental disorder onset and psychopathology levels. DISCUSSION: Our results imply DIBs' relevance to mental health and related outcomes. When working with the ICDS’s German version, we recommend employing only the “insecurity” subscale, as this was the only scale revealing acceptable psychometric properties. Future studies should improve the construct validity of the ICDS (and its subscales), e.g., by adding more items to the respective subscales and further classes of DIBs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05155-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10523705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105237052023-09-28 Measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among a heterogeneous German-speaking sample Kirchner, Lukas Kloft, Matthias Arias Martín, Beatriz Berg, Max Anjedanimoghadamaraghi, Paria Schäfer, Leonora Rief, Winfried BMC Psychiatry Research BACKROUND: Dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs (DIBs) are a key symptom domain in numerous mental disorders. Because DIBs exert a strong influence on social experience and behavior, they play an important role in a mental disorder's development and progression. To date, only the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale (ICDS) captures DIBs independently of specific disorders, populations, or contexts. The present study's aim was to psychometrically evaluate and validate a German translation of the ICDS. METHODS: The ICDS was administered along with indicators of convergent (rejection sensitivity, depressive expectations, interpersonal trust, interpersonal problems, perceived social support), discriminant (self-efficacy, perseverative negative thinking, optimism), and clinical validity (psychopathology, perceived stress, well-being) to a pooled sample incorporating non-clinical (N = 114) and clinical (N = 94) participants. RESULTS: An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) suggested a five-factor solution (factor loadings: .44 to .85). Correlational analyses demonstrated acceptable convergent (ρ = -.29 to -.35, ρ = .27 to .59), suboptimal discriminant (ρ = -.27 to -.38, ρ = .52), and acceptable clinical validity (ρ = -.21, ρ = .36 to .44) at the total-scale level. However, results at the subscale level were mixed and required nuanced interpretation. Likewise, internal consistency was acceptable at the total-scale level (α = .76), but ranged from good to poor at the subscale level (α = .61 to .80). DIBs mediated the negative relationship between mental disorder onset and psychopathology levels. DISCUSSION: Our results imply DIBs' relevance to mental health and related outcomes. When working with the ICDS’s German version, we recommend employing only the “insecurity” subscale, as this was the only scale revealing acceptable psychometric properties. Future studies should improve the construct validity of the ICDS (and its subscales), e.g., by adding more items to the respective subscales and further classes of DIBs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05155-3. BioMed Central 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10523705/ /pubmed/37759204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05155-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kirchner, Lukas
Kloft, Matthias
Arias Martín, Beatriz
Berg, Max
Anjedanimoghadamaraghi, Paria
Schäfer, Leonora
Rief, Winfried
Measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among a heterogeneous German-speaking sample
title Measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among a heterogeneous German-speaking sample
title_full Measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among a heterogeneous German-speaking sample
title_fullStr Measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among a heterogeneous German-speaking sample
title_full_unstemmed Measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among a heterogeneous German-speaking sample
title_short Measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among a heterogeneous German-speaking sample
title_sort measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the interpersonal cognitive distortions scale among a heterogeneous german-speaking sample
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05155-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kirchnerlukas measuringdysfunctionalinterpersonalbeliefsvalidationoftheinterpersonalcognitivedistortionsscaleamongaheterogeneousgermanspeakingsample
AT kloftmatthias measuringdysfunctionalinterpersonalbeliefsvalidationoftheinterpersonalcognitivedistortionsscaleamongaheterogeneousgermanspeakingsample
AT ariasmartinbeatriz measuringdysfunctionalinterpersonalbeliefsvalidationoftheinterpersonalcognitivedistortionsscaleamongaheterogeneousgermanspeakingsample
AT bergmax measuringdysfunctionalinterpersonalbeliefsvalidationoftheinterpersonalcognitivedistortionsscaleamongaheterogeneousgermanspeakingsample
AT anjedanimoghadamaraghiparia measuringdysfunctionalinterpersonalbeliefsvalidationoftheinterpersonalcognitivedistortionsscaleamongaheterogeneousgermanspeakingsample
AT schaferleonora measuringdysfunctionalinterpersonalbeliefsvalidationoftheinterpersonalcognitivedistortionsscaleamongaheterogeneousgermanspeakingsample
AT riefwinfried measuringdysfunctionalinterpersonalbeliefsvalidationoftheinterpersonalcognitivedistortionsscaleamongaheterogeneousgermanspeakingsample