Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.LISA)

BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress syndrome is the main cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. “Less invasive surfactant administration” (LISA), which describes intratracheal surfactant administration to spontaneously breathing infants via a small diameter tube, is recommended as the fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Göpel, Wolfgang, Rausch, Tanja K., Mitschdörfer, Barbara, Mader, Silke, Herting, Egbert, König, Inke R., Stichtenoth, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07603-7
_version_ 1785110617122668544
author Göpel, Wolfgang
Rausch, Tanja K.
Mitschdörfer, Barbara
Mader, Silke
Herting, Egbert
König, Inke R.
Stichtenoth, Guido
author_facet Göpel, Wolfgang
Rausch, Tanja K.
Mitschdörfer, Barbara
Mader, Silke
Herting, Egbert
König, Inke R.
Stichtenoth, Guido
author_sort Göpel, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress syndrome is the main cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. “Less invasive surfactant administration” (LISA), which describes intratracheal surfactant administration to spontaneously breathing infants via a small diameter tube, is recommended as the first-line treatment in preterm infants with more than 30% supplemental oxygen. Prophylactic use of LISA in preterm infants with less than 30% supplemental oxygen was not tested in randomised controlled trials yet, and long-term outcome data of the procedure are scarce. METHODS: Preterm infants with a gestational age between 25 weeks + 0 days and 28 weeks + 6 days who are breathing spontaneously on continuous positive airway pressure with supplemental oxygen at or below 30% in the first hour of life will be randomised to a prophylactic LISA treatment with 100–200 mg surfactant intratracheally per kilogramme bodyweight (intervention group) or will continue the continuous positive airway pressure treatment (control group). Participants will have follow-up until age 5 years. At that time, the children will be tested by spirometry, and forced expiratory volume within 1-s z-scores will be compared between the intervention and control groups as the primary outcome parameter of the trial. Secondary endpoints include additional lung function parameters, endurance, motor development, intelligence, and sensitivity for infectious lung diseases. Short-term safety assessment will be done after completed enrolment (n = 698) and discharge of all infants. This safety assessment will include in-hospital mortality and short-term complications. DISCUSSION: Robust data concerning the possible long-term benefits of prophylactic LISA treatment are lacking. The current observational data from the German Neonatal Network indicate that approximately 50% of preterm infants with supplemental oxygen at or below 30% within the first hour of life are treated with LISA. The pro.LISA trial will provide short- and long-term outcomes of preterm infants receiving prophylactic treatment and will clarify if prophylactic treatment should be given to all preterm infants or if the current practice of selective treatment if supplemental oxygen exceeds 30% is more appropriate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00028086. Prospectively registered on 8 February 2022.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10523706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105237062023-09-28 A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.LISA) Göpel, Wolfgang Rausch, Tanja K. Mitschdörfer, Barbara Mader, Silke Herting, Egbert König, Inke R. Stichtenoth, Guido Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress syndrome is the main cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. “Less invasive surfactant administration” (LISA), which describes intratracheal surfactant administration to spontaneously breathing infants via a small diameter tube, is recommended as the first-line treatment in preterm infants with more than 30% supplemental oxygen. Prophylactic use of LISA in preterm infants with less than 30% supplemental oxygen was not tested in randomised controlled trials yet, and long-term outcome data of the procedure are scarce. METHODS: Preterm infants with a gestational age between 25 weeks + 0 days and 28 weeks + 6 days who are breathing spontaneously on continuous positive airway pressure with supplemental oxygen at or below 30% in the first hour of life will be randomised to a prophylactic LISA treatment with 100–200 mg surfactant intratracheally per kilogramme bodyweight (intervention group) or will continue the continuous positive airway pressure treatment (control group). Participants will have follow-up until age 5 years. At that time, the children will be tested by spirometry, and forced expiratory volume within 1-s z-scores will be compared between the intervention and control groups as the primary outcome parameter of the trial. Secondary endpoints include additional lung function parameters, endurance, motor development, intelligence, and sensitivity for infectious lung diseases. Short-term safety assessment will be done after completed enrolment (n = 698) and discharge of all infants. This safety assessment will include in-hospital mortality and short-term complications. DISCUSSION: Robust data concerning the possible long-term benefits of prophylactic LISA treatment are lacking. The current observational data from the German Neonatal Network indicate that approximately 50% of preterm infants with supplemental oxygen at or below 30% within the first hour of life are treated with LISA. The pro.LISA trial will provide short- and long-term outcomes of preterm infants receiving prophylactic treatment and will clarify if prophylactic treatment should be given to all preterm infants or if the current practice of selective treatment if supplemental oxygen exceeds 30% is more appropriate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00028086. Prospectively registered on 8 February 2022. BioMed Central 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10523706/ /pubmed/37752593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07603-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Göpel, Wolfgang
Rausch, Tanja K.
Mitschdörfer, Barbara
Mader, Silke
Herting, Egbert
König, Inke R.
Stichtenoth, Guido
A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.LISA)
title A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.LISA)
title_full A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.LISA)
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.LISA)
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.LISA)
title_short A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.LISA)
title_sort randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.lisa)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07603-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gopelwolfgang arandomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT rauschtanjak arandomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT mitschdorferbarbara arandomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT madersilke arandomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT hertingegbert arandomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT koniginker arandomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT stichtenothguido arandomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT arandomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT gopelwolfgang randomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT rauschtanjak randomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT mitschdorferbarbara randomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT madersilke randomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT hertingegbert randomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT koniginker randomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT stichtenothguido randomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa
AT randomisedcontrolledtrialinpreterminfantscomparingprophylacticwithselectivelessinvasivesurfactantadministrationprolisa