Cargando…

Do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ED patients? Retrospective analysis of a random sample from two German metropolitan EDs

BACKGROUND: To assess differences between patients referred to emergency departments by a primary care physician (PCP) and those presenting directly and the impact of referral on the likelihood of admission. DESIGN OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: EDs of two nonacademic general hospita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umgelter, Andreas, Faust, Markus, Wenske, Slatomir, Umgelter, Katrin, Schmid, Roland M., Walter, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00542-9
_version_ 1785110632228454400
author Umgelter, Andreas
Faust, Markus
Wenske, Slatomir
Umgelter, Katrin
Schmid, Roland M.
Walter, Georg
author_facet Umgelter, Andreas
Faust, Markus
Wenske, Slatomir
Umgelter, Katrin
Schmid, Roland M.
Walter, Georg
author_sort Umgelter, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess differences between patients referred to emergency departments by a primary care physician (PCP) and those presenting directly and the impact of referral on the likelihood of admission. DESIGN OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: EDs of two nonacademic general hospitals in a German metropolitan region. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 1500 patients out of 80,845 presentations during the year 2019. RESULTS: Age was 55.8 ± 22.9 years, and 51.4% was female. A total of 34.7% presented by emergency medical services (EMS), and 47.7% were walk-ins. One-hundred seventy-four (11.9%) patients were referred by PCPs. Referrals were older (62.4 ± 20.1 vs 55.0 ± 23.1 years, p < .001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (3 (1–5) vs 2 (0–4); p < .001). Referrals received more ultrasound examinations independently from their admission status (27.6% vs 15.7%; p < .001) and more CT and laboratory investigations. There were no differences in sex, Manchester Triage System (MTS) category, or pain-scale values. Referrals presented by EMS less often (9.2% vs 38.5%; p < .001). Admission rates were 62.6% in referrals and 37.1% in non-referrals (p < .001). Referral (OR 3.976 95% CI: 2.595–6.091), parenteral medication in ED (OR 2.674 (1.976–3.619)), higher MTS category (1.725 (1.421–2.093)), transport by EMS (1.623 (1.212–2.172)), abnormal vital parameters (1.367 (0.953–1.960)), higher CCI (1.268 (1.196–1.344)), and trauma (1.268 (1.196–1.344)) were positively associated with admission in multivariable analysis, whereas ultrasound in ED (0.450 (0.308–0.658)) and being a nursing home resident (0.444 (0.270–0.728)) were negatively associated. CONCLUSION: Referred patients were more often admitted. They received more laboratory investigations, ultrasound examinations, and computed tomographies. Difficult decisions regarding the necessity of admission requiring typical resources of EDs may be a reason for PCP referrals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-023-00542-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10523768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105237682023-09-28 Do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ED patients? Retrospective analysis of a random sample from two German metropolitan EDs Umgelter, Andreas Faust, Markus Wenske, Slatomir Umgelter, Katrin Schmid, Roland M. Walter, Georg Int J Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: To assess differences between patients referred to emergency departments by a primary care physician (PCP) and those presenting directly and the impact of referral on the likelihood of admission. DESIGN OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: EDs of two nonacademic general hospitals in a German metropolitan region. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 1500 patients out of 80,845 presentations during the year 2019. RESULTS: Age was 55.8 ± 22.9 years, and 51.4% was female. A total of 34.7% presented by emergency medical services (EMS), and 47.7% were walk-ins. One-hundred seventy-four (11.9%) patients were referred by PCPs. Referrals were older (62.4 ± 20.1 vs 55.0 ± 23.1 years, p < .001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (3 (1–5) vs 2 (0–4); p < .001). Referrals received more ultrasound examinations independently from their admission status (27.6% vs 15.7%; p < .001) and more CT and laboratory investigations. There were no differences in sex, Manchester Triage System (MTS) category, or pain-scale values. Referrals presented by EMS less often (9.2% vs 38.5%; p < .001). Admission rates were 62.6% in referrals and 37.1% in non-referrals (p < .001). Referral (OR 3.976 95% CI: 2.595–6.091), parenteral medication in ED (OR 2.674 (1.976–3.619)), higher MTS category (1.725 (1.421–2.093)), transport by EMS (1.623 (1.212–2.172)), abnormal vital parameters (1.367 (0.953–1.960)), higher CCI (1.268 (1.196–1.344)), and trauma (1.268 (1.196–1.344)) were positively associated with admission in multivariable analysis, whereas ultrasound in ED (0.450 (0.308–0.658)) and being a nursing home resident (0.444 (0.270–0.728)) were negatively associated. CONCLUSION: Referred patients were more often admitted. They received more laboratory investigations, ultrasound examinations, and computed tomographies. Difficult decisions regarding the necessity of admission requiring typical resources of EDs may be a reason for PCP referrals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-023-00542-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10523768/ /pubmed/37752441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00542-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Umgelter, Andreas
Faust, Markus
Wenske, Slatomir
Umgelter, Katrin
Schmid, Roland M.
Walter, Georg
Do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ED patients? Retrospective analysis of a random sample from two German metropolitan EDs
title Do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ED patients? Retrospective analysis of a random sample from two German metropolitan EDs
title_full Do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ED patients? Retrospective analysis of a random sample from two German metropolitan EDs
title_fullStr Do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ED patients? Retrospective analysis of a random sample from two German metropolitan EDs
title_full_unstemmed Do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ED patients? Retrospective analysis of a random sample from two German metropolitan EDs
title_short Do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ED patients? Retrospective analysis of a random sample from two German metropolitan EDs
title_sort do patients referred to emergency departments after being assessed in primary care differ from other ed patients? retrospective analysis of a random sample from two german metropolitan eds
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37752441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00542-9
work_keys_str_mv AT umgelterandreas dopatientsreferredtoemergencydepartmentsafterbeingassessedinprimarycaredifferfromotheredpatientsretrospectiveanalysisofarandomsamplefromtwogermanmetropolitaneds
AT faustmarkus dopatientsreferredtoemergencydepartmentsafterbeingassessedinprimarycaredifferfromotheredpatientsretrospectiveanalysisofarandomsamplefromtwogermanmetropolitaneds
AT wenskeslatomir dopatientsreferredtoemergencydepartmentsafterbeingassessedinprimarycaredifferfromotheredpatientsretrospectiveanalysisofarandomsamplefromtwogermanmetropolitaneds
AT umgelterkatrin dopatientsreferredtoemergencydepartmentsafterbeingassessedinprimarycaredifferfromotheredpatientsretrospectiveanalysisofarandomsamplefromtwogermanmetropolitaneds
AT schmidrolandm dopatientsreferredtoemergencydepartmentsafterbeingassessedinprimarycaredifferfromotheredpatientsretrospectiveanalysisofarandomsamplefromtwogermanmetropolitaneds
AT waltergeorg dopatientsreferredtoemergencydepartmentsafterbeingassessedinprimarycaredifferfromotheredpatientsretrospectiveanalysisofarandomsamplefromtwogermanmetropolitaneds